Overview

Product video
This is a repackaged open source software wherein additional charges apply for extended support with a 24 hour response time.
The LAMP Stack Debian 13 AMI provides a robust and versatile platform for deploying web applications. By leveraging the power of Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP, this AMI is optimized for high performance and security, making it an ideal solution for developers and businesses alike.
Key Features
- Full LAMP Configuration: Pre-installed with the latest versions of Linux (Debian 13), Apache web server, MySQL database, and PHP for seamless development and deployment.
- Performance Optimizations: Enhanced settings and configurations for improved performance tailored specifically to the Debian environment.
- Security Best Practices: Regularly updated to incorporate the latest security patches and best practices, ensuring that your applications remain secure and compliant.
- Scalability: Easily scalable infrastructure allows your applications to grow with demand, making it suitable for everything from small projects to enterprise-level deployments.
Benefits
- Rapid Deployment: Instantly launch a fully configured LAMP stack, significantly reducing setup time and enabling faster project initiation.
- Community Support: Leverage the vast community of Debian and LAMP users for resources, documentation, and troubleshooting.
- Customizability: Modify and extend your installations as needed to meet unique application requirements.
Use Cases
- Web Development: Ideal for developing and testing dynamic web applications with PHP frameworks such as Laravel and Symfony.
- Content Management Systems: Perfect for deploying popular CMS platforms like WordPress, Drupal, or Joomla.
- E-commerce Solutions: Set up robust online stores using platforms like Magento or WooCommerce with the trust of a solid technological foundation.
- API Hosting: Host RESTful APIs and microservices with ease while ensuring efficient communication and data management.
Deploy the LAMP Stack Debian 13 AMI today and empower your web applications with an efficient, secure, and high-performance environment.
Try our most popular AMIs on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 24.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 22.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 20.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 18.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 10 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 8 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 13 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 12 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 11 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 (RHEL 10) AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (RHEL 9) AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (RHEL 8) AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 8 AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 7 AMI on AWS EC2
- Amazon Linux 2023 AMI on AWS EC2
- Windows 2022 Server AMI on AWS EC2
- Windows 2019 Server AMI on AWS EC2
- Docker on Ubuntu 22 AMI on AWS EC2
- Docker on CentOS 10 AMI on AWS EC2
Highlights
- The LAMP Stack Debian 13 AMI provides a powerful and flexible open-source web application development environment, combining Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. This pre-configured image allows developers to quickly launch applications with a fully operational web server, database management system, and scripting language. Enjoy the robustness of Debian 13, which ensures improved security and performance for your projects.
- Utilizing the LAMP Stack Debian 13 AMI, developers can efficiently scale their web applications in a cloud environment. This AMI's ease of deployment makes it suitable for rapid prototyping or production environments. With a broad range of libraries and extensions available for PHP, users can enhance application functionality effortlessly, catering to diverse application requirements across industries.
- Furthermore, the LAMP Stack Debian 13 AMI supports a variety of use cases, from hosting dynamic websites to building RESTful APIs. Its compatibility with popular content management systems like WordPress and Drupal provides a ready-to-use solution for developers. Leverage the reliability of this AMI to streamline the deployment process and boost your productivity while ensuring a stable operational foundation.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
- ...
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
t2.xlarge Recommended | $0.28 |
t2.micro | $0.21 |
t3.micro | $0.07 |
r5dn.large | $0.14 |
c6in.12xlarge | $3.36 |
m7a.xlarge | $0.28 |
d3en.12xlarge | $3.36 |
x2idn.24xlarge | $4.48 |
r7a.16xlarge | $4.48 |
z1d.large | $0.14 |
Vendor refund policy
The instance can be terminated at anytime to stop incurring charges
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
System Updates
Additional details
Usage instructions
Once the instance is running, connect to it using a Secure Shell (SSH) client with the configured SSH key. The default username is 'admin'.
Default web root is: /var/www/html
MySQL can be secured by executing: mysql_secure_installation
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Email support for this AMI is available through the following: https://supportedimages.com/support/ OR support@supportedimages.com
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Reliable web stack has supported long-term hosting and simplifies secure reverse proxy workflows
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for LAMP Stack Debian is for web application development and reverse proxy engineering, where I apply security ACLs for infrastructure in my campus and at other companies where I have worked. Most of my cases involve web applications that are self-hosted based.
A quick specific example of a web application I have hosted or managed with LAMP Stack Debian is hosting the website of the company and hosting web applications such as tools and ERPs for the company, which are based mostly on Apache and MySQL databases, primarily MariaDB databases, exclusively based on LAMP architecture.
How has it helped my organization?
LAMP Stack Debian has impacted my organization positively through stability. Apache does not change that much, which is good because when you are trying to patch your whole infrastructure, you might sometimes face cases where your configuration no longer works because you have upgraded the web server. With Apache, which is quite stable, you do not encounter many cases that cause problems. It can happen that one of the modules changes, but it remains compatible. Retro-compatibility is one of the main advantages with Apache.
When I mention retro-compatibility and stability, it has saved me time and reduced downtime significantly. It makes life much easier when you are upgrading new systems. For instance, whether you are going from an old Debian 10 to 11 or 12, there is not a big change regarding Apache because Apache remains retro-compatible with the other operating system. This is one of the main points. You are definitely reducing the risk of having downtime.
What is most valuable?
The best features that LAMP Stack Debian offers in my experience include scalability concerning databases. Most of the features that you can do on Apache involve the web interface where you are listening on port 80, but you can also add features in terms of security where you can tweak and add proxies, new ACLs, and get other tools like WebDAV, which stands out compared to other web servers such as Nginx, which is the main competitor of Apache.
These features, specifically WebDAV, have helped me in my day-to-day work because I have used WebDAV when some customers needed to have access to our files but could not use SFTP, NFS shares, or other classical ways to share a large amount of data. WebDAV stood out as the main solution and the perfect fit because anyone nowadays has a web browser, either on a computer, a smartphone, or other devices. This solution was the one we approached and it proved to be the ideal solution.
What needs improvement?
LAMP Stack Debian can be improved by providing an out-of-the-box cluster solution without having to build it around it. A cluster solution would make life easier for everyone.
Regarding LAMP Stack Debian's governance and security, this is still something that needs to be experienced, as it is too soon to jump into a conclusion.
Regarding LAMP Stack Debian's accuracy and reliability of output, this is very accurate from what I have tested.
There are no other improvements needed for LAMP Stack Debian that I have not mentioned.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using LAMP Stack Debian for approximately 14 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
LAMP Stack Debian is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
LAMP Stack Debian's scalability is very high.
My experience with LAMP Stack Debian's scalability includes having to scale up or down quickly or manage a large number of users or applications through an HAProxy to failover between two stacks.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used Nginx instead of Apache, mostly because I was using an HAProxy solution.
How was the initial setup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for LAMP Stack Debian is great.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment, knowing that most of the tools around LAMP are free. You cannot have a negative outcome. You can only have a return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for LAMP Stack Debian is great.
What other advice do I have?
The advice I would give to others looking into using LAMP Stack Debian is to understand the size of the need that they require. They need to understand and size up the requirement accordingly. The review rating for this product is not available.
Reliable web hosting has supported wordpress deployments while legacy components still need refinement
What is our primary use case?
LAMP Stack Debian is basically a full backend, very often used for WordPress hosting, which is my primary use case.
One of the things that I have been working on is setting up an automated pipeline for a customer to deploy WordPress, and I needed to deploy LAMP Stack Debian with those instances as well. We ran this in Kubernetes , for example.
If you ever want to ask a beginner Linux administrator to set up a web server, they are probably going to set up LAMP Stack Debian to showcase that everything is working. It is the default for a lot of web hosting, and I think it has very mature tooling and a really strong integration into Linux.
The internet runs on Linux, and websites will run on LAMP Stack Debian, which is very easy to deploy. If you want to set up a web server, you can do that with LAMP Stack Debian within a few minutes.
LAMP Stack Debian is very often deployed in some kind of cloud environment, also used a lot on VPSs and in Kubernetes . It runs well in containers as well, and it runs on bare metal; you have a couple of options there.
What is most valuable?
I think that LAMP Stack Debian is not necessarily a very good stack, but it is a very proven stack, and that is where it really shines. It is an industry standard.
It is also interesting to call out that LAMP Stack Debian comes in two flavors; the default is of course MySQL , but you can also use MariaDB , whatever you prefer. This is also a little bit operating system dependent.
I have nothing measurable to share, but a lot of stacks are based on LAMP Stack Debian as a backend or as a web server, and LAMP Stack Debian is extremely reliable and extremely proven. It is something you do not have to discover yourself; you just take LAMP Stack Debian and it works.
What needs improvement?
It is an old stack, and I am not necessarily a fan of PHP, to be honest. This is not improving LAMP Stack Debian but changing it. I am not necessarily a fan of PHP, but it is very performant and it uses very little resources. I also like using other stacks as well. How can it be improved? LAMP Stack Debian itself, I do not think can be improved; it is continuously updated with MySQL and with the proxy that is in there, the MySQL database that is in there, and the PHP server. I do not think it can be improved; there are other more contemporary stacks that might be interesting to consider, but LAMP Stack Debian is always updated. Things the .htaccess file can sometimes be a bit finicky with the Apache proxy.
I think that will become then a different stack, and the Apache HTTP server is not a proxy. It is what it is; it is very much proven. If you change that, then it is not proven anymore.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using LAMP Stack Debian on and off for the past ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
LAMP Stack Debian is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Its scalability is good, if not excellent; if you have very large websites, it might not work, but I would say for ninety-nine percent of the use cases, for WordPress, a simple LAMP Stack Debian will absolutely do. You can, of course, scale your database into a bigger system, but if you are going to go down that route, you are going to use a different kind of website altogether.
How are customer service and support?
It is open source. You go to Stack Overflow or whatever and find your solution. There is also managed LAMP Stack Debian where you get better support, but in essence, I would argue there is no support because it is open-source software; everybody can use it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I would not argue that I was using a different stack before that; different use cases have different stacks, and for a specific use case, you use LAMP Stack Debian.
How was the initial setup?
I would advise others to just give LAMP Stack Debian a try; try it on your Raspberry Pi or your local computer so you get your bearings. Know that there are Helm charts out there for Kubernetes so you do not have to write them yourself; it is a great way of getting started.
What was our ROI?
There is no cost associated with it, so there is no pricing, no licensing, and thus, there is no return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
LAMP Stack Debian is open-source software, so I do not purchase it at all.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options because LAMP Stack Debian is defined by whatever tool you are trying to install, so that is more of a given.
What other advice do I have?
I do not think it is the best stack out there; I think there are better stacks out there, but it depends on your use case, and it is boring but proven and good. You cannot go wrong with choosing LAMP Stack Debian, but in the end, I think there are better alternatives out there under development at least.
There are not any AI capabilities in LAMP Stack Debian.
There is no AI capability inside of LAMP Stack Debian.
I gave this product a review rating of seven.
Lean web stack has delivered predictable uptime and reduces resource usage for critical apps
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case for LAMP Stack Debian is hosting highly stable and lightweight corporate web applications, customer-facing back-ends, and content management platforms. We chose LAMP Stack Debian when we need an incredibly clean baseline operating system with absolute minimal background bloat.
What is most valuable?
In our deployment workflow, we use LAMP Stack Debian as the underlying OS layer for our stateless application nodes. For instance, when we launched a client portal, a public cloud load balancer routes incoming HTTPS traffic to a pool of Debian instances running Apache and PHP-FPM. The PHP layer handles the core application logic and seamlessly queries a decoupled and secure database cluster. Because LAMP Stack Debian's memory footprint is so small, more system resources are available directly from the PHP execution.
Since standardizing certain monolithic web stacks on LAMP Stack Debian, we have seen a noticeable reduction in idle RAM usage, often saving 15 to 20% on memory consumption per instance compared to the heavier operating systems we used earlier. This resource efficiency translates directly to cost savings, allowing us to safely downsize cloud instance types. Our system uptime across these nodes is effectively 99.9% or more, as we only reboot the servers for critical kernel live patches.
The best features of LAMP Stack Debian are its peerless system stability, the lightweight nature of the base OS installation, and the rock-solid reliability of the APT package manager that is coupled with the massive LAMP Stack Debian packages repository.
What needs improvement?
The primary drawback of LAMP Stack Debian's hyper-focus on stability is that the software versions in the stable repository channels for PHP, MySQL , and MariaDB packages can become outdated quickly relative to the fast-moving web ecosystems.
Documentation can always be improved. Additionally, obtaining modern and performant web runtimes such as PHP 8.3+ on a stable LAMP Stack Debian release is challenging. Engineers must routinely integrate trusted third-party repositories such as Sury APT repositories. It would be highly beneficial if the native LAMP Stack Debian security and backports schemes offered slightly faster and official access to major runtime versions without forcing developers to go outside the core ecosystem.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been configuring, deploying, and optimizing LAMP Stack Debian on various Debian releases for over four to five years across both production and staging environments.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
LAMP Stack Debian is completely stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
There is much scalability of LAMP Stack Debian, and we love it.
How are customer service and support?
We do not use customer support from enterprise vendors. We use the community documentation for LAMP Stack Debian when we need to find or debug any issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
LAMP Stack Debian's commitment to free software means there are no commercial telemetry engines or unneeded background daemons running out of the box. You get exactly what you install, giving you total control over the system's attack surface and performance tuning.
Unlike Red Hat variants that rely on DNF and SELinux, LAMP Stack Debian utilizes APT and AppArmor for security hardening. The feature I rely on the most is APT's deterministic dependency resolution. In a DevOps pipeline, knowing that an automated security patch will not accidentally pull down an untested dependency that breaks Apache or PHP is absolutely invaluable for day-to-day operations.
How was the initial setup?
Time is saved because most of the packages for LAMP Stack Debian are already built completely. There are just a few things that we have to explicitly get from external repositories that need some human input. Other than that, there is less effort required to install it on Debian.
What was our ROI?
LAMP Stack Debian has streamlined our operational overhead because it is highly predictable and universally respected by Linux engineers. Our infrastructure requires significantly less manual intervention and maintenance compared to faster-moving or commercially aggressive distributions.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We do not buy licensing for LAMP Stack Debian, so we go with the free versions.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
As an open-source infrastructure foundation, LAMP Stack Debian does not ship with native AI utilities. However, its security governance model is impeccable with features including built-in AppArmor, performance profiling, strict package vetting, and rapid security advisories. It provides an incredibly secure host platform for running any custom AI application logic or data pipelines.
The accuracy of any AI workflow hosted on LAMP Stack Debian is entirely dependent on the specific code base and the weights and LLM APIs integrated by the developers. LAMP Stack Debian's role is purely to ensure that the underlying processing environment remains completely stable, deterministic, and highly reliable.
What other advice do I have?
Ensure you take full advantage of LAMP Stack Debian backports or trusted maintainers' repositories if your web application requires the latest PHP features. Also, take advantage of AppArmor to isolate your Apache daemon and keep your installation minimal to enjoy the massive performance benefits. I give this product a review rating of 9.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Long-term hosting with trusted security and compliance has supported diverse web projects
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for LAMP Stack Debian