Overview

Product video
This is a repackaged open source software wherein additional charges apply for extended support with a 24 hour response time.
Overview
Docker on Oracle Linux 10 offers a powerful combination of containerization and a stable, enterprise-ready operating system. This AMI is optimized for running containerized applications efficiently in the AWS cloud environment.
Key Features
- Seamless Integration: Deploy and manage your containers easily with full support for Docker commands and capabilities.
- Optimized Performance: Leverage Oracle Linux 10's lightweight architecture for improved resource allocation and faster deployment times.
- Security Enhancements: Benefit from built-in security features of Oracle Linux, including SE Linux and automated updates, to protect your containerized applications.
- Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources and documentation are available to assist with deployment, management, and troubleshooting of your containers.
Benefits
- Flexibility: Quickly scale your applications by spinning up and down container instances as needed.
- Cost-Effective: Reduce infrastructure costs by fully utilizing cloud resources with containerization, minimizing resource waste.
- Ease of Management: Simplify the deployment lifecycle with Docker's tooling for monitoring, versioning, and orchestration.
- Consistency Across Environments: Ensure consistency between development, testing, and production environments through the use of containers.
Use Cases
- Microservices Architecture: Deploy and manage microservices applications with enhanced isolation and scalability.
- Development and Testing: Create isolated environments for development and testing, enabling fast iterations without affecting production.
- Hybrid Cloud Deployments: Facilitate hybrid cloud strategies by running Docker containers across on-premises and public cloud environments.
Docker on Oracle Linux 10 is your go-to solution for building, scaling, and managing containerized applications in the cloud, ensuring that you leverage the full capabilities of both Docker and Oracle Linux. Experience the future of application deployment with this powerful combination.
Try our most popular AMIs on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 24.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 22.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 20.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 18.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 10 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 8 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 13 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 12 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 11 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 (RHEL 10) AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (RHEL 9) AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (RHEL 8) AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 8 AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 7 AMI on AWS EC2
- Amazon Linux 2023 AMI on AWS EC2
- Windows 2022 Server AMI on AWS EC2
- Windows 2019 Server AMI on AWS EC2
- Docker on Ubuntu 22 AMI on AWS EC2
- Docker on CentOS 10 AMI on AWS EC2
Highlights
- Docker on Oracle Linux 10 offers a robust containerization platform that streamlines application deployment and management. By utilizing Oracle Linux's advanced security features and compatibility with enterprise applications, users can efficiently run, manage, and scale containerized workloads.
- This AMI simplifies the installation and configuration process, allowing developers to quickly get started with container-based applications. Additionally, it supports a wide range of development tools and libraries, enabling seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users can leverage Docker's extensive ecosystem for microservices architectures, improving the overall agility and responsiveness of their application development lifecycle.
- Leveraging Docker on Oracle Linux 10 is particularly advantageous for enterprises looking to modernize their applications and reduce operational overhead. Organizations can easily create isolated environments for testing and production, facilitating faster debug cycles and increasing deployment frequency. With comprehensive support and regular updates, businesses can confidently adopt container technology while minimizing risk and ensuring compliance with industry standards.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
- ...
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
t3a.micro Recommended | $0.07 |
t2.micro | $0.21 |
t3.micro | $0.07 |
c5n.18xlarge | $4.48 |
c5ad.xlarge | $0.28 |
d3.8xlarge | $2.24 |
r7iz.12xlarge | $3.36 |
c7i.xlarge | $0.28 |
r6idn.8xlarge | $2.24 |
r5.metal | $3.36 |
Vendor refund policy
The instance can be terminated at anytime to stop incurring charges
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
System update
Additional details
Usage instructions
Once the instance is running, connect to it using a Secure Shell (SSH) client with the configured SSH key. The default username is 'centos'.
OS commands via SSH: SSH as user 'centos' to the running instance and use sudo to run commands requiring root access.
Run docker test with:
sudo docker run hello-world
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Email support for this AMI is available through the following: https://supportedimages.com/support/ OR support@supportedimages.com
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Container workflows have transformed deployments and now support consistent releases
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case for Docker on CentOS is to package, deploy, and run applications consistently across development, testing, and production environments. I use Docker to containerize applications along with all their dependencies, ensuring they run the same regardless of the underlying infrastructure. On CentOS , I typically use Docker to build Docker images using Dockerfiles, run containerized applications such as web services and APIs, manage multi-container applications using Docker Compose when needed, isolate applications to avoid dependency conflicts, simplify deployment and rollbacks by using versioned Docker images, support CI/CD pipelines by building, testing, and deploying containers automatically, and finally , to prepare applications for orchestration with Kubernetes in production.
One additional point I want to add is that I don't just use Docker to run containers, but I use it as a part of a complete deployment workflow. On CentOS , I typically build optimized Docker images using multi-stage builds to reduce the image size. I also store configuration and secrets outside the image using environment variables or external secret management solutions. I use Docker volumes for persistent application data and bind mounts where appropriate. I create a custom Docker network so services can communicate securely while remaining isolated. I monitor container health using Docker health checks and logs. I tag images with version numbers to support controlled deployment and quick rollbacks. Finally, I integrate Docker into CI/CD pipelines, so every code change is automatically built, tested, and deployed.
What is most valuable?
Docker on CentOS offers several features that make application deployment and management efficient and reliable. One feature is containerization that packages the application with all its dependencies, ensuring consistent operation across different environments. Another is portability; Docker containers can be moved easily between development, testing, and production without modification. Isolation is another key feature, as each container runs independently, preventing dependency conflicts between applications. Lastly, Docker on CentOS's lightweight nature allows containers to share the host operating system kernel, making them much more efficient than traditional virtual machines. There are many features, and I could mention more than these.
Docker on CentOS has had a significant positive impact on the organization in several ways. First, it standardized the deployment process, as every environment from deployment to testing and production uses the same Docker images, which eliminates configuration drift and reduces environment-related issues. Second, it accelerated application deployment; instead of manually installing dependencies on servers, we simply pull the required Docker image and start the container, reducing deployment time from hours to just a few minutes. Third, it improved resource utilization since Docker containers share the host operating system kernel, allowing us to run multiple applications efficiently on the same CentOS server with lower resource consumption than traditional virtual machines. It has also enhanced scalability; during periods of increased demand, we could quickly start additional container instances to handle the extra workload and remove them when demand decreased. From an operational perspective, Docker on CentOS simplified troubleshooting and rollback, as if a new deployment introduced an issue, we could quickly deploy the previous stable image, minimizing downtime. Finally, Docker on CentOS integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, allowing build, automated testing, and deployments to be performed consistently, which increased our release frequency, reduced human error, and improved overall application reliability.
What needs improvement?
While Docker on CentOS is a robust platform, there are areas for improvement, such as simpler security configuration around Linux policies, enhanced built-in monitoring and diagnostics for easier troubleshooting, improved image validation and vulnerability management, more intelligent resource management, seamless upgrades and compatibility, and enhanced logging and debugging capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Docker on CentOS for the past five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Docker on CentOS has been very stable in my experience, especially when deployed using supported versions and following best practices.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before adopting Docker on CentOS, we evaluated several alternatives based on deployment consistency, scalability, ease of management, and cost. The main options we considered included traditional virtual machines like VMware and Hyper-V , which provided strong isolation but consumed more CPU, memory, and storage while provisioning new environments slower than using containers. We evaluated Podman, which integrates well with CentOS and supports daemon-less, rootless containers as a secure alternative. However, at the time, Docker had a larger ecosystem, broader community support, and better integration with our systems and CI/CD tools. We also considered Red Hat OpenShift for enterprise container orchestration, but it introduced additional complexity and increased costs that were unnecessary for our needs. For Kubernetes , we evaluated it for orchestration; rather than replacing Docker on CentOS, we viewed Kubernetes as the platform to orchestrate Docker containers as our environment scaled.
How was the initial setup?
My experience with Docker on CentOS is that it is cost-effective and relatively inexpensive to set up. Docker on CentOS engine itself is open-source, so there is no license cost for the container runtime we use on our CentOS server. Our primary expenses are related to the underlying infrastructure, such as virtual machines, cloud instances, storage, networking, and monitoring tools, not Docker on CentOS itself. The initial setup cost was low; installing Docker on CentOS took less than an hour, and once the base configuration, security settings, and CI/CD integration were in place, additional applications could be deployed quickly with minimal effort.
What was our ROI?
We observed a positive return on investment after adopting Docker on CentOS. While Docker on CentOS didn't necessarily reduce the number of employees, it significantly improved team productivity and operational efficiency. Some measurable improvements include a reduction in deployment time from forty-five to sixty minutes to under ten minutes, representing an eighty to eighty-five percent reduction. Environment-related issues dropped by approximately eighty percent as the same Docker image was used consistently across all environments. Recovery time during failed deployments improved from about thirty minutes to less than five minutes by rolling back to a previous image. Infrastructure utilization increased by around thirty to forty percent since multiple containers could efficiently share resources.
What other advice do I have?
My advice is to start with a solid foundation and follow container best practices from the beginning. First, use official and minimal base images to reduce the attack surface and improve performance. Keep both the CentOS host and Docker engine updated with the latest security patches. Second, avoid running containers as root users; use the principle of least privilege, enable SELinux, and scan container images regularly for vulnerabilities before deploying them to production. Third, automate your deployments by integrating Docker on CentOS with CI/CD pipelines. This ensures consistent builds, automated testing, and reliable deployment while reducing manual errors. I also recommend using Docker volumes for persistent data, custom networks for secure communication between services, and health checks, so failed containers can be detected and restarted automatically. Finally, start with a small proof of concept, document your Docker files and deployment process, monitor your containers using logging and metrics, and then scale gradually as your team gains experience. Overall, Docker on CentOS is a mature, reliable, and cost-effective platform. With good security practices, automation, and monitoring, it can significantly improve application deployment consistency and operational efficiency. I would rate my overall experience with this solution a nine out of ten.
Dedicated servers have hosted databases reliably and have accelerated project spin-up
What is our primary use case?
I use Docker on CentOS as a dedicated server to spin up a few containers with WordPress, including a database. I run several kinds of databases, which is my main use case for Docker on CentOS . This is typically orchestrated by Docker Compose and runs on a CentOS server.
What is most valuable?
The best features Docker on CentOS offers is that it works exceptionally well, and I would say that is the most valuable aspect.
Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization because we spend much more time on spinning up projects. We have scripts that help us make it work on CentOS , which has saved us a considerable amount of time.
It is difficult to calculate the exact time saved since using Docker on CentOS, but I am confident it is around 35 to 40 percent. I can measure it in this way.
What needs improvement?
Based on my experience, Docker on CentOS works for my needs and I currently cannot find anything I would like to add.
Nothing comes to mind regarding needed improvements for Docker on CentOS because all our use cases are covered by existing functionality.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Docker on CentOS for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Docker on CentOS means that all functionality is working as needed and I usually do not face any troubles with spinning up containers or spend time troubleshooting. This indicates that it is very stable.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise that Docker on CentOS is one of the best Linux systems, and I would highly recommend using it without any concerns about disadvantages or reasons to prevent someone from using it.
I have nothing to add about Docker on CentOS at this time.
Regarding Docker on CentOS's AI capabilities, I suppose AI capabilities should be great to have.
My view on Docker on CentOS's AI capabilities is that it is reliable regarding its accuracy and reliability of output, especially if there is enough context. Otherwise, any LLM will not work well without sufficient context.
I give this review a rating of 9.5.
Containerization has streamlined deployments and now simplifies managing workload transitions
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Docker on CentOS is specific to my line of work. If there are any platforms that we have to commission, we prefer to containerize them, which makes them very lightweight and easier to manage. I know that their dependencies are all packaged into the container, so they are not dependent on the bare metal or the host operating systems' dependencies.
I'm leveraging Docker on CentOS in that anything we have to do, we always look at the strategy and ask if it can be containerized. Then we look at containerizing it.
What is most valuable?
The best features Docker on CentOS offers include the fact that it is OS agnostic and works with its own prerequisites bundled into the container, which makes it flexible to deploy whichever application I'm looking at, so I am no longer held to my system's binaries.
In terms of scalability, I really love how easy it is to spin up another container in order for me to manage workloads, which also makes the management of all workloads easier.
Since adopting Docker on CentOS with a DevOps model, it has positively impacted my organization by making deployments faster, scaling up has become much easier, and the management of services has become more streamlined.
What needs improvement?
I wish Docker on CentOS's scalability could reach the level of what something like Kubernetes does, as it can scale to the heights of where Kubernetes gets to, and the integrations are much more widespread.
I'm fairly satisfied with Docker on CentOS, but I hope that out of the box, especially with the community editions as well as the enterprise edition, it comes with a graphical user interface.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Docker on CentOS for roughly a year and a half, and we are still transitioning from monolithic architectures to containerized ones.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Docker on CentOS is stable in my experience, as it has been stable so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Docker on CentOS in my environment is pretty flexible. As long as I deploy on the right infrastructure, I am able to scale as much as I want.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using Docker on CentOS is that they should adopt it, as it's an enjoyable platform to work with. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.
Docker workflows have accelerated web deployments and testing but still need stronger security and monitoring
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Docker on CentOS is running containers for different application webs. For example, I run a Moodle or different APIs and microservices that are developed in Docker on CentOS .
Before Docker was very complicated. Doing the testing with the developer, and with Docker it is very fast to deploy the different changes.
What is most valuable?
I find working with APIs and microservices in Docker on CentOS to be very useful and very practical. Docker is fast, lightweight, and makes apps run the same everywhere without problems.
On CentOS , Docker provides the same core features as other Linux systems, which is not very special, but I can run containers, manage images, store data, and deploy apps.
I mainly rely on container images and volumes every day in Docker on CentOS, plus networking when apps need to connect. For example, volumes are essential when I need to keep data persistent, like databases or logs.
Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by helping us deploy faster, avoid environment problems, and make the system more reliable and easier to manage.
With Docker deploying faster, we save approximately 30% of the time on production issues or in the pipelines, which are specific outcomes I have observed.
What needs improvement?
Docker on CentOS can be improved with better security, easier storage management, and smoother integration with CI/CD and orchestration tools.
I think better monitoring, easier debugging, and more standard behavior across environments will make Docker on CentOS even better.
Other improvements needed for Docker on CentOS include improving compatibility, security scanning, easier default setup, and clear enterprise documentation, for example.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Docker on CentOS for about four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Docker on CentOS is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Docker on CentOS has super scalability with Kubernetes , but it also has scalability without Kubernetes .
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously tried containers on Ubuntu , but I quickly changed to Docker on CentOS.
What was our ROI?
I have only seen a return on investment in terms of time saved because I save my time, but in economic terms, no, because it was free.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Docker on CentOS is that it is free. The licensing is free, so it is very good.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Docker on CentOS, I evaluated other options such as Docker on Ubuntu or virtual machines.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Docker on CentOS is to start simple, use trusted images, which is very important, learn networking and volumes, and focus on security and monitoring. I would rate this product a 7.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Containerization has accelerated medical data pipelines and supports secure orchestration
What is our primary use case?
Our main use case for Docker on CentOS is to run separate data pipelines to ensure that we isolate multiple processings to avoid conflicts, to accelerate our pipelines and make sure that it's properly processed down the road.
For example, we have a huge amount of datasets, and when it comes to running some specific queries or running data parallelly, we use Docker on CentOS sometimes on top of Google Cloud .
Docker on CentOS has been useful to us because we are also a medical device company, so it has helped us accelerate things and deliver them faster on our medical device.
What is most valuable?
The best features Docker on CentOS offers for our team are easy deployment, containerization, and Docker Compose orchestration. We also value the data volume persistency.
The orchestration using the YAML file is something we really appreciate on a daily basis and it's straightforward.
Docker on CentOS has positively impacted our organization with deployment, easy orchestration, and the learning curve is also good for our teams.
What needs improvement?
We would improve Docker on CentOS because we never use it for image processing, for example. We would like to be able to use it efficiently for image processing since we have a couple of projects coming up, and if that can be accelerated, that would be beneficial.
Regarding Docker on CentOS's AI capabilities, we have a lot of challenges because of the bubble of AI. The security on Docker on CentOS needs to be highly improved to avoid threats around it and also help us protect better our stakeholders' data, more specifically patient data.
While we don't use conversational AI, regarding Docker on CentOS's AI capabilities, we do deploy machine learning algorithms and use them, but we don't use conversational AI.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using Docker on CentOS for a while now, and we use it for orchestration.
What other advice do I have?
Our team, since we are still a startup, doesn't have a lot of senior members, so most of them are intermediate and entry-level. Something we've noticed is it doesn't take a lot of time for them to understand how Docker on CentOS works, and it doesn't take them a lot of time to quickly start deploying solutions and data pipelines on the infrastructure. We really appreciate that because it cuts down our delivery time. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.