
Overview

Product video
Asana is the platform for human and AI collaboration. When teams collaborate effortlessly, they can achieve just about anything.
Now, you can redefine how your teams and AI work together with the power of cross-app data. Asana + Amazon Quick Suite enhances the power of AI Studio and Smart Chat, seamlessly connecting your Asana work with critical information from apps like Salesforce, Outlook, Sharepoint, Google Drive, and Gmail. In doing so, it unlocks key use cases like project intake, campaign management, and product launches -- transforming how teams work and deliver results.
With Asana + Amazon Quick Suite organizations can: Connect tools in minutes: leverage cross-app data quickly and confidently with one-time setup and secure permissions Build integrated workflows and agents: design AI-powered workflows and agents that unify teams and tools -- no code required Scale AI company-wide: access real-time data and insights where your teams already work
IDCs research found that organizations that rely on Asana see 42% faster execution, 72% increase in employee satisfaction, 34% more projects delivered on time and 437% 3-year ROI. Asana enables organizations and teams to: Align the entire organization with goals Coordinate workflows across teams Enhance individual focus and impact Increase productivity with actionable insights Scale securely and reliably as your grow
Loved by customers like Sony Music, Zoom, and LVMH in 190 countries, Asana gives teams the greater confidence and clarity they need to move faster and accomplish more with less.
Highlights
- For Marketing teams, when planning a campaign in Asana, they can instantly access previous campaign briefs from Google Docs, competitive analysis from SharePoint, and customer feedback from Salesforce -- all without switching applications.
- PMO teams can pull budget data from Google Sheets, stakeholder communications from Outlook, and project documentation from SharePoint to get comprehensive portfolio insights directly within their Asana dashboards.
- IT teams can access technical documentation from Google Drive, and team communications from Outlook to accelerate problem resolution and project delivery.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Trust Center
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
200 Annual Licenses of Starter | For teams that need to create project plans with confidence. | $26,376.00 |
100 Annual Licenses of Advanced | For teams and companies that need to manage work across initiatives. | $29,988.00 |
100 Annual Licenses of Enterprise | Organizations that need centralized visibility, control, and support. | $48,000.00 |
Vendor refund policy
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
We have designed resources and services to support your organization, teams, and individual end users at any stage of the work management journey. To learn about Asana, please check out Work Management Resources for best practices, Asana Academy, and Asana Guide documentation. support@asana.com
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Collaborated across teams and have managed task pipelines and deadlines more efficiently
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Asana is identifying the progress of tasks assigned to the team. I utilize Asana for team collaboration, team ticket generation for each task, and to collaborate through comments, which serves as the tracking mechanism for product development and project management.
For one of my current projects, whenever a new task comes into view, we have a specific team divided into front-end, back-end, DevOps, AI, and project manager roles. All team members are assigned to the specific task. Whatever task they pick up, we move it to in-progress status and then mark it as completed once the task has been finished. For example, if I want to create a background task for an AI process that will implement categorical scenarios to understand how user behaviors respond to specific video comments, we need to generate a whole pipeline-based scenario. This includes what the background of Asana's ticket should be, who needs to be assigned to this task, who will be doing this task, who is the assignee, who will be reporting this task, what will be the deadline, and what approach they have implemented once completed. All of these things are maintained in Asana, which tracks user continuity and how they are approaching specific project tickets and tasks.
What is most valuable?
In my opinion, the best features Asana offers include all product management scenarios, such as how tickets can be generated and what assignees and assigners need to be adapted. It can be integrated with external CRM tools and external collaboration tools like Slack and MS Teams . Asana also offers MCP and its toolkit, which we can utilize perfectly.
I find myself using ticket management the most among those features.
Asana has impacted my organization positively by being very useful for product management and task management. We manage internally how tasks can be assigned to specific teams and how they can be launched on specific dates. Deadline-based use cases can be completed, enhanced, and tracked perfectly through collaboration of different teams.
I would say that we are working on time for each task and can manage who can pick what kind of task by checking the specific workflow. This gives insight into what needs to be done in future ticket pipelines. Based on how many tickets are created, we can justify priorities and complete them as soon as possible. We can maintain deadlines as well. Productivity metrics such as the time of completion for any specific ticket or feature that we are building can be implemented perfectly. All of these things are maintained in a professional manner in Asana.
What needs improvement?
Asana can be improved by adding a voice-based assistant for ticket generation. Currently, everything needs to be written manually, so we could add voice integration. Additionally, calling mechanisms are not available to collaborate between the team for any specific task. If anything needs to be collaborated within the team, we need to tag them instead of having a calling mechanism to check on pending tasks. A notification system could send updates to other team members as well.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Asana for around three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Asana is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Asana's scalability is perfect. Multiple teams and multiple team members can collaborate with each other.
How are customer service and support?
I would say customer support is very good. Both email and calling support are working perfectly. The chatbot of Asana also provides perfect responses. The pre-generated FAQs offer clarity on what steps need to be included, which is sufficient.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Jira prior to choosing Asana. Both tools have specific strengths. Asana is very simple to learn and understand. All workflows, Kanban boards, collaboration, tickets, and logs are maintained perfectly in both. Jira has Confluence integrated, which allows for documentation and article-based cases, giving it some advantage. However, it is very difficult to understand and maintain the content. In that regard, Asana is good, but it does not have the flexibility to write notes-based documentation.
I have used only these two solutions before choosing Asana.
What was our ROI?
I have definitely seen a return on investment with Asana. The efficiency of building the whole project has increased through team management using Asana. Multiple clients work directly with this collaboration tool, so definitely there has been a return on investment.
Excellent Task Management and Collaboration for Transparent Accountability
Business Analyst
Collaboration
Projects that connect and collide

