The PagerDuty Operations Cloud is essential infrastructure for all unplanned, time-sensitive, critical work. It automatically detects and diagnoses disruptive events mobilizes the right team members to respond and automate infrastructure and workflows across your digital operations. This means you can resolve unplanned, unstructured, time-sensitive, and high-impact issues quickly with fewer escalations to your technical teams while minimizing the impact on your customers and maintaining brand trust.
High customer expectations and increasingly distributed systems mean disruptions to digital service can have catastrophic effects on sales, brand loyalty, and operating costs. The PagerDuty Operations Cloud deflects unnecessary work from teams and subject matter experts so they can focus on delivering business value. Urgent work is escalated to the right teams and routine work is made self-service. Teams can automate and accelerate issue resolutions with minimal human interruption-and improve system resilience and team capacity while reducing the strain of operational complexity and the unexpected.
With more than 700 integrations, APIs, and apps for customer service, the PagerDuty Operations Cloud empowers rapid responses in any environment. And thanks to more than 10 years of data ingestion, its machine learning-powered AIOps functionality can reduce alert noise by up to 98% and drive down MTTR with critical context for faster triage and effective automation.
PagerDuty integrates with various AWS services, including AWS CloudWatch, Amazon GuardDuty, AWS CloudTrail, AWS Personal Health Dashboard, Amazon EventBridge, AWS Security Hub, Amazon DevOps Guru, AWS Control Tower, AWS Outposts, and AWS S3 Storage Lens.
AIOps
PagerDuty AIOps helps teams reduce noise, triage efficiently to drive the right actions towards resolution, and remove manual, repetitive work from the incident response process. Noise reduction baked in with an ML model that learns and adapts based on user behavior means teams see fewer incidents overall. And automating toil from manual event processing results in greater efficiency, saving teams valuable time for innovating.
Process Automation
PagerDuty Runbook Automation is a managed cloud service that enables DevOps teams and SREs to create and delegate operational tasks in automated runbooks to other stakeholders such as developers, NOC personnel, and incident responders. Runbook Automation provides automated workflows and task automation focused on IT and developer process automation. Examples include service provisioning, CI/CD, configuration management, incident diagnosis and remediation, and more. With PagerDuty Runbook Automation, you can resolve requests in minutes, rather than days, optimize security and compliance, and give your engineers more time to spend on innovation rather than firefighting.
Incident Response
PagerDuty helps you save time and money by bringing together the right teams with the right information to resolve incidents faster. Replace manual processes with automation to streamline incident response, freeing up time and resources for more innovation. Orchestrate end-to-end incident response with a service ownership model that only brings in the teams you need. Over 21K organizations trust PagerDuty to help them adopt DevOps best practices and build more resilient operational practices to minimize costly downtime and protect the customer experience.
Custom Private Offer
All PagerDuty platforms are available through a custom private offer. Please use the contact form at <www.pagerduty.co.jp/contact-us/> for help to create a custom offer tailored to your needs.
Highlights
Incident Response - Manage incidents end-to-end
Process Automation - Automate and delegate business and IT processes
AIOps - Maximize IT capacity with fewer incidents and faster resolution
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor, and additional usage. You pay upfront or in installments according to your contract terms with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. Usage-based pricing is in effect for overages or additional usage not covered in the contract. These charges are applied on top of the contract price. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before the contract end date, access to your entitlements will expire.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
This listing uses a contract model with two pricing dimensions that work together. You buy the PagerDuty Subscription, which sets your contracted level of use for the Operations Cloud platform. Pricing scales with the number of users you add to your account, since each person who receives notifications or joins a schedule counts toward billing. The second dimension, additional events over contracted value, applies only when your event volume exceeds what your contract covers. You pay for that overage on top of your base subscription, so usage above the committed amount is billed separately.
Top-of-mind questions for buyers
What counts as one user for billing on the PagerDuty Subscription?
A user is anyone added to your account who receives notifications or joins an on-call schedule. Each such person counts toward billing. Read-only stakeholder users are counted separately and added in packages, so they are billed apart from standard responder users.
What counts as an event, and when do overage charges start?
An event is a valid signal sent to PagerDuty through email or API that returns a successful response. Your subscription covers a contracted event volume. Once your usage passes that committed amount, each extra event bills under the additional events dimension, on top of your base subscription.
Which dimension drives most of my bill — users or events?
The PagerDuty Subscription is the base charge and scales with the number of users you add. The additional events dimension applies only when event volume exceeds your contracted level. For most accounts, user count drives the bill; event overage adds cost only during high-volume periods.
www.pagerduty.co.jp+1
Helpful?
Vendor refund policy
All fees are non-cancellable and non-refundable except as required by law.
How can we make this page better?
Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.
Give us feedbackReport a problem with this product or seller
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA).
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Our team provides multiple resources for customers to find answers to questions and get help with our product. Users may browse our integration guides (pagerduty.com/integrations) to integrate with partner tools, our knowledge base (support.pagerduty.com) to learn more about using PagerDuty, and our developer docs (developer.pagerduty.com) to use our APIs.
Additionally, anyone can interact with other PagerDuty users and PagerDuty employees via the PagerDuty Community (community.pagerduty.com). Our Support team is available during regular business hours around the globe, Monday through Friday, and can be contacted at: Email: support@pagerduty.com or via a ticket submitted at tickets.pagerduty.com
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
The PagerDuty Operations Cloud is essential infrastructure for all unplanned, time-sensitive, critical work. It automatically detects and diagnoses disruptive events mobilizes the right team members to respond and automate infrastructure and workflows across your digital operations. This means you can resolve unplanned, unstructured, time-sensitive, and high-impact issues quickly - with fewer escalations to your technical teams while minimizing the impact on your customers and maintaining brand trust.
Dantech enables healthcare and life sciences organizations to accelerate innovation by delivering secure, compliant, and high-performance cloud platforms paired with expert product operations. By combining deep HCLS domain expertise with AWS-native engineering and operational excellence, Dantech reduces time to value, lowers total cloud cost, and ensures research and product environments perform at scale. The result is faster discovery, improved patient outcomes, and a trusted partner that turns complex cloud operations into a competitive advantage.
Accelerate your DevOps transformation with our Cloud Operations Accelerator, offering seamless integration across multicloud and hybrid environments. Streamline deployments and enhance security with our expertly designed CI/CD pipelines, Infrastructure as Code, and comprehensive monitoring solutions.
Automated alerting has streamlined incident response and improved team coordination
Reviewed on Aug 26, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
The usual use cases for PagerDuty Operations Cloud include incident management. I ran the infrastructure teams and SRE, so the primary use case was incident management and spinning up RCAs, tracking remediation. We also used it for identifying key stakeholders of projects. We relied on the escalation chains and the groups. Even if it wasn't an incident, if somebody had a question or they needed to get a hold of the CMS team, they would go into PagerDuty. We had a lot of integrations into Teams chat.
The heart of it was obviously kicking off pages from alerts within PagerDuty Operations Cloud. It was fully automated so that when an anomaly was detected, it automatically created an incident in PagerDuty. That automation was just table stakes. We also had some good automations to follow up and close out Jira tickets that would integrate with the PagerDuty incident. The primary one was simply calling the people when something happens.
What is most valuable?
My favorite feature about PagerDuty Operations Cloud is that it just worked. It was one of the tools we didn't have to worry or think about. It was very well polished. It did what they said they were going to do, and it didn't require a lot of customization. I think it facilitated us organizing the teams, groups, and escalation chains really well. However, there is no feature that stands out significantly.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud absolutely requires maintenance on my end. Escalation chains and people get stale very quickly. I wish it would integrate into org charts or an HR system so that when people get terminated or shift roles, PagerDuty knows about the changes. We had one escalation chain where it went up to an executive that wasn't in the company anymore.
What needs improvement?
The users would complain that they always had a hard time maintaining their schedules, their escalations, and installing the app. I got a lot of complaints from the people that responded to pages rather than from the people who administered PagerDuty.
The complaints I remember were about how users wanted to be notified. It was very common for somebody to misconfigure their own communication chain and not test it, so when an alert went off, their excuse was they didn't get the page or they didn't get the SMS. I got a lot of feedback from users that they struggled to do their shift when they needed someone to cover their shift. Often that wouldn't get done. Anything that can be done to make that as easy and simple as possible would be helpful.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have probably used PagerDuty Operations Cloud for about five years total.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of PagerDuty Operations Cloud has been great. I have not experienced any stability issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have no problems with scalability. I have used it for like 500 engineers and experienced no issues.
How are customer service and support?
I did not have any partnerships with them. I was just a customer and user.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used some alternatives. I used Grafana incident management a lot and we used something called RingCentral.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment for a new client when starting with PagerDuty Operations Cloud was moderate. I would say it was more difficult because the biggest problem we had was just identifying who the responders were. It does take a bit of setup. We also did the Teams integration, which requires security and permission. The setup is always hard, though this is not necessarily a criticism on PagerDuty.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I am not current on what the current pricing is for PagerDuty Operations Cloud, but I assume it is per seat and per responder.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
If I were to pick one, PagerDuty Operations Cloud is the one I would pick if there were no budget concerns. If I was budget-constrained, I would pick Grafana.
What other advice do I have?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud did influence the volume and nature of alerts. We had more of them. I have implemented this three major times in my career, and the number of incidents immediately shot up and then came down. What happens is you identify the incidents more aggressively and then you actually fix the problems. I think that is a good thing.
I have not used Incident Workflows or Event Orchestration to automate toil from the incident management process. We played with it, but I did not use them in practice.
I did not use the AI agents at all. I would rate this review a 9.
Aryan Dwivedi
Real-time alerts have protected client sites and now keep our team focused on critical issues
Reviewed on Aug 25, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is used for real-time alerts when something goes wrong with our system so the team can fix it right away, and for setting up on-call schedules to ensure the right person is always ready to answer the problem at any time of the day. We also use it for scaling up discovery calls with our clients and prospects.
Last month, one of our main web servers stopped working in the middle of the day, and the system sent an instant notification to the team, who automatically used our on-call schedule to contact the right engineer on duty, saving us precious time instead of guessing who to call.
We have used PagerDuty Operations Cloud to control the external noise from the alerts.
What is most valuable?
The real-time notification is top-notch, and critical warnings reach the right person right away without delay. Smart tools that reduce extra alert noise are great for keeping the team focused on real-time problems. The large number of connections to over 700 different software tools allows us to bring all work together in one workflow.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has helped fix critical problems much faster, including the ads we are running that do not crash, the websites we run for our clients, and our CRM website.
I cannot say that PagerDuty Operations Cloud has reduced downtime or improved our team's response time because we have been using it for around two months only. However, we have seen reduced downtime and quick resolution of issues because everyone is notified when something is damaged, whereas earlier we would only find out about issues when the client called us. This also gave us a demerit because the client thought we could not do the work properly, resulting in a significant reduction in our monthly retainer. Now we are stable with our monthly retainer.
The security governance of PagerDuty Operations Cloud is pretty good.
Regarding its accuracy and reliability of output, I would say it is pretty much accurate.
PagerDuty's generative AI is pretty good, although sometimes the decision can be a bit generic and not very reliable, but they are improving it.
What needs improvement?
The learning curve for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is a bit steep, with its complicated rules and schedules, and we have to dedicate a proper team to use that tool.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using PagerDuty Operations Cloud for two months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is pretty much stable and I have not seen it crashing.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is pretty much scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I have not used customer support until now, but I believe they will be great.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were not using any different solution; this is the first time we are going for an on-cloud platform.
What about the implementation team?
I cannot share how my team has leveraged automation within PagerDuty Operations Cloud because it is a bit confidential.
What was our ROI?
It helps us save manual hours of work every week.
For me as an employee, I would say the time has been reduced and the downtime has been reduced.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I was not on the team that evaluated options before choosing PagerDuty Operations Cloud, so I cannot tell you about this.
What other advice do I have?
We are still in the process of implementing AI and automation through PagerDuty for incident response.
I cannot answer that question right now because we are still testing PagerDuty's autonomous AI agents.
The alert reduction feature has been reporting to us issues such as a client's website being down or the CRM website being down, which I would say has saved us.
I would say that if your team can purchase PagerDuty Operations Cloud, you can definitely use it, although it is a bit costly for a startup, as was pointed out by my team too, but we have saved a lot of time.
I gave this review a rating of 9 out of 10.
Raj kuruhuri
Alert noise has been cut and on-call teams respond faster to critical incidents
Reviewed on Aug 10, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
Our main use case for using PagerDuty Operations Cloud is because our L1 team was under constant stress from alert storms and missed escalations that were threatening our service reliability. We chose it to streamline the escalation matrices, and it has been excellent for us. It has streamlined our escalation metrics and drastically reduced erroneous notifications, meaning my engineering teams are now only waking up in the middle of the night for actual revenue-impacting emergencies. It has brought stability to our operations and allowed us to respond accurately and swiftly.
The main use case is to ensure that our services run uninterrupted while optimizing our operational cost. We are using it as the central hub for IT alerting, incident management, and automated on-call scheduling across the organization.
How has it helped my organization?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has definitely been a game changer for the organization. The return on investment has been significant and highly visible. It has helped us reduce alert noise and surface resolution insight. We have saved an average of 30 minutes per incident, which totals a time savings of at least 70% to 80% per year. On a broader operational scale, the built-in ticketing management, the macros, and the automation have saved us the equivalent of at least three to four full-time employees, which has minimized our cost.
Most importantly, it has minimized our downtime by catching signals earlier and translated that to productive revenue, which has avoided an estimated loss worth one million dollars for our company.
What is most valuable?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has given us very clear AI-driven alert grouping. The autonomous AI agent calculated alerts and suppressed the noise. We used to get temporary traffic spikes or minor upgrade dips, and it has ensured that wherever there is a need for a security alert, it provides the security alert in real time, 24/7.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud includes automated escalation, which helps us set up a call and join the right person via SMS, mobile push, or direct phone call. Another valuable feature is historical data insight, which gives clear insight during an incident and surfaces the historical data on forward-looking resolution from similar past events. This helps the team resolve issues faster.
These features have given us real-time insight and a historical and present-time alert system via SMS, mobile push, or direct phone call. Even if the team has missed an alert at the regular time, it provides historical data and insight to ensure we understand why an incident has been raised or why a security breach has occurred.
What needs improvement?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is working as expected, but if I were to suggest one improvement, I believe that the AI could be better. The accuracy can be improved because during consistent critical events, it occasionally groups unrelated alerts or misses a correlation, which forces our on-call team to fall back to manual triage.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using PagerDuty Operations Cloud in our organization for the last three and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We experienced 100% stability. We did not face any challenges.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is definitely a scalable product. We can easily scale up and down as per our needs. It has great scale.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is a 10 out of 10. We had an interaction with them for one of the incidents, and they resolved it within 30 minutes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of PagerDuty Operations Cloud has been excellent. We have chosen the pay-as-you-go licensing through AWS Marketplace, which has been a great option for us.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing PagerDuty Operations Cloud, we definitely evaluated other options and alternatives to ensure we were selecting the right solution. Some solutions we considered included Opsgenie by Atlassian, Better Stack, xMatters, and Splunk On-Call.
What other advice do I have?
The alert reduction feature of PagerDuty Operations Cloud has given us at least 30 minutes per incident and has reduced the overall tasks and work that was being done. We have seen a reduction in time and a reduction in the incidents, and we have saved a lot of money as well.
The team has leveraged PagerDuty Operations Cloud to optimize the incident workflows in a positive way. It has given us clear insight into all incidents. We can easily track them in the history section. The impact is significant because it has optimized our workflows, optimized team capacity, and optimized the quality of incidents. The major impact is on time. The team has been allocated tasks on time, and they are able to deliver them on time.
I give PagerDuty Operations Cloud a rating of nine out of ten. Since it has provided us exceptional results, I have given it a nine, and one point is deducted for the improvement I have suggested. Anyone who is looking for a dedicated platform for alerting and automation-related incidents should definitely go with PagerDuty Operations Cloud. They are the best in this category.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
reviewer2879727
Unified incident response has reduced alert noise and improves on-call focus and coordination
Reviewed on Jul 26, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
I have used PagerDuty Operations Cloud for two years, so I have over two years of experience with it.
My main duties in PagerDuty Operations Cloud are incident routing, escalation policies, on-call management, incident response coordination, and integrations.
For incident routing, I connected AWS CloudWatch alarms to PagerDuty using the Event API. When our EC2 CPU crosses 85%, CloudWatch pushes the alert to PagerDuty, which then routes it to the backend services team. I also used event rules to auto-tag alerts and suppress duplicates. Another use case is on-call management. I used PagerDuty's mobile app to acknowledge alerts during off hours. For example, on weekends, such as Sunday morning, when there is an incident I acknowledged a high-priority alert from my phone and joined the Slack room directly from the PagerDuty incident link. This is helpful for those who are on call during off shifts. Regarding integrations, since we use many integrations on PagerDuty, we integrated PagerDuty with Slack so incidents automatically created a dedicated channel. I also connected it to Jira so incidents could generate tickets for follow-up actions, and also to ServiceNow as well.
What is most valuable?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud excels at routing alerts, managing on-call schedules, coordinating incidents, and automating remediation. These features make it helpful for the on-call team and the people who are working with PagerDuty Operations Cloud.
The feature I use the most is incident routing. We use incident routing more than anything else because it is the main foundation of PagerDuty Operations Cloud. If routing is incorrect, nothing else is going to work, no escalations, no on-call, and no automation at all. I use it the most because it is the first step in every incident; it ensures that alerts from different cloud platforms or any other third-party providers such as AWS, Azure, and other platforms including Datadog reach the right service. It prevents misrouted alerts and missed incidents and it directly impacts the MTTA, because responders get the alert instantly. Every other PagerDuty Operations Cloud feature depends on routing being accurate. I use incident routing daily in this way. This is the main foundation of PagerDuty Operations Cloud, to work with it and to make it a very easy platform for us to work with.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud excels at routing alerts, managing on-call schedules, coordinating incidents, and automating remediation. It ensures critical alerts reach the right teams instantly, reducing the MTTA and MTTR. It strengthened the on-call process with dependable escalations and real-time incident coordination, preventing missed alerts and speeding up resolution tasks. Automation and noise reduction features help cut down repetitive manual work and alert fatigue, allowing engineers to focus on real issues.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud significantly reduced alert noise and improved MTTA. Our acknowledgement time dropped almost by half, and MTTR improved by around 15–20% due to improved automation and routing.
The alert noise dropped by 20–25% after tuning event rules. After implementing PagerDuty Operations Cloud, we saw a 20–25% reduction in alert noise and a noticeable improvement in MTTA. Our acknowledgement time dropped by almost half and the MTTR improved by around 15–20%. MTTR improved by 15–20% due to major incident automation and better routing, which also reduced unnecessary on-call interruptions. It made a good impact on our current schedules and in my current organization.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud's alert reduction features helped lower operational cost by cutting unnecessary alerts and reducing on-call interruptions by grouping and suppressing noisy alerts. The team spent less time triaging low-value incidents, which directly reduced overtime and burnout. The biggest impact for us was fewer false alarms, meaning engineers could focus on real issues instead of constant alert fatigue.
What needs improvement?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its noise reduction by making deduplication and suppression more automated instead of manually tuned, and the service dependency graph could be more intuitive with cleaner visuals and easier-to-understand root cause tracing during major incidents. Automation could go further with smarter runbook triggers and AI-driven suggestions to help find root causes, which could save a lot of time for engineers who are struggling to understand what is actually happening. These AI capabilities could lower the time by maybe 50–60%. Analytics and reporting could be more flexible, allowing custom dashboards and filters and team-level MTTA and MTTR breakdowns, so that it is segregated based on teams and it is much easier to have custom dashboards for the teams to understand more.
Alert storms were a recurring frustration for the on-call team, and escalation overrides and service dependency graphs can get a bit confusing in larger environments. More customizable analytics and smarter automation would make the platform even easier, more flexible and more powerful for the team to understand.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its analytics flexibility with customized dashboards and AI capabilities to be more trained and more reliable. Service dependency mapping can also feel cluttered in big environments, making it harder to trace upstream and downstream impacts during bigger incidents.
We implemented PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI to help with alert grouping and early incident insights, but accuracy was not consistent enough to rely on during critical events. It occasionally grouped unrelated alerts or missed correlations, which limited the operational efficiency gains we expected. The on-call team still depended heavily on manual triage because AI suggestions were not always aligned with the real root cause. Overall, AI added some value but it has not yet reached the reliability needed to significantly improve the incident response efficiency. It needs more training or more work.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is stable in day-to-day use with no major outages or reliability issues affecting our on-call workflows. Alert delivery, incident routing and escalation chains have been consistently working without delays or missed notifications. Its cloud-native architecture also means updates and patches roll out smoothly without impacting uptime. Overall, the stability has been one of the strongest features for our team.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud scales well for growing teams. Adding services, integrations and new on-call groups does not impact performance. Its native cloud architecture handles higher alert volumes smoothly, especially when paired with strong incident routing. We have seen it manage increased workloads without slowing down or causing notification delays. On the whole, scalability has been reliable even as our environment and service footprint has expanded.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support has been responsive and generally helpful when we have raised any issue. They provided clear troubleshooting steps and follow-ups. Resolution speed can vary depending on the severity of the issue, but support has been good and reliable for day-to-day operational needs.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before PagerDuty Operations Cloud, we used basic native alerting tools such as AWS CloudWatch since AWS is our primary cloud platform. We switched because those tools lacked valuable incident routing and consistent on-call escalation workflows. PagerDuty Operations Cloud offered stronger coordination, better noise reduction, and more mature incident response features. The move was mainly driven by the need for a unified and dependable on-call and incident management platform.
What was our ROI?
We have actually seen a moderate return on investment mainly through reduced alert noise and more efficient incident routing. Alert storms dropped by roughly 20–25%, saving the team several hours per week that used to be spent on low-value triage. We estimate a small cost reduction from fewer overtime hours and less on-call fatigue, though not enough to reduce headcount. Overall, the return on investment is positive but incremental — more time saved than money saved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud's pricing felt reasonable but it definitely is not the cheapest option. The value comes more from reliability than cost savings. Setup costs were minimal since it is a SaaS platform and onboarding did not require any infrastructure or hidden implementation costs or fees. Licensing is straightforward but scaling seats for larger teams can get expensive, especially when adding advanced features. Overall the experience was smooth but the price point could be more flexible for growing teams. Our team is small now but in the future it might become bigger.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before adopting PagerDuty Operations Cloud, we evaluated options such as Opsgenie and Splunk On-Call for incident management. We also looked at other native cloud tools such as AWS CloudWatch, but they lacked the escalation workflows. Opsgenie had good features but did not match PagerDuty Operations Cloud's reliability and integrations for bigger teams. Overall, PagerDuty Operations Cloud offered stronger coordination and more consistent on-call performance which made us choose it.
What other advice do I have?
Escalation policies are a very helpful feature for managing the team, such as multi-step escalation logic which is extremely dependable and prevents missed alerts, and also the automation runbook. I rely on incident routing daily because it ensures the alerts reach the right team. The other features, such as integrations, are really good to integrate PagerDuty Operations Cloud with different platforms, such as Jira and ServiceNow platforms to automatically open an incident. These are really helpful top features.
I would give PagerDuty Operations Cloud eight out of ten, considering all the features I have been using and also the improvements I have suggested. I chose eight out of ten because PagerDuty Operations Cloud is generally strong in the areas that matter the most, especially incident routing and escalation management which are extremely reliable and directly reduce MTTA and MTTR. It stands out for dependable on-call orchestration and smooth incident response coordination, especially with Slack and Jira integrations. But it does not reach a ten because noise reduction still needs more automation, analytics lack deeper customization such as custom dashboards to filter among the teams, and the service dependency graph gets cluttered in large environments. With smarter automation and improved visualization of the analytics, it could easily move closer to a perfect ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Mukul Bhati
Automation has reduced manual support effort and has improved incident response accuracy
Reviewed on Jul 16, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is for doing the automation part and minimizing the efforts. It decreases the count of the L1 support team because most of the tasks have been handled by the operation of PagerDuty Operations Cloud and the AI.
What is most valuable?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers several valuable features that have significantly benefited our operations. The solution keeps the person available and only rings the alert while there is any outage or any issue generated in the live environment. Additionally, it has an automated section where it handles similar issues if they happen again and is able to troubleshoot them by itself by running those jobs or actions that have been put in PagerDuty Operations Cloud.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud positively impacts our organization by helping us increase the overall SLA delivery. Earlier, we were having a delivery count of 87% or 88%, but after setting up PagerDuty Operations Cloud, we were able to achieve the SLA up to 99.5% post-installation. The improvement in SLA and SLI is mostly because of the faster incident response and fixing the issues that are most generic and reoccurring, which has been minimized and helped us increase the SLA and SLI.
What needs improvement?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is already at its best, but AI can be integrated just to set it up and continue learning and provide a list of fixes that can be applied as suggestions, as that might help improve PagerDuty Operations Cloud operations.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using PagerDuty Operations Cloud for around three years or more.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is stable and much more stable than previous solutions.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud's scalability is much more stable than expected. We can scale it up whatever the requirements are, so scalability is good.
How are customer service and support?
Regarding customer support, we never found any reason to get support from the customer. We were already supported while setting up the infrastructure and it was good. I would rate the customer support on a scale of one to ten as ten out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we were using Teams for generating the alerts and Slack, but we prefer PagerDuty Operations Cloud, which offers many more options and setups that can be used.
How was the initial setup?
To deploy PagerDuty Operations Cloud in our organization, we have used public and private cloud. Earlier it was on-premises but we switched to private cloud.
What about the implementation team?
We have implemented the AI and automation through PagerDuty Operations Cloud for incident response. As mentioned earlier, it increased the SLA from 87% to 99% and our operations have been improved, and there is a very low count of clear or false alerts.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment. We have cost-cutting on the employees as we have decreased the headcount since there is less man labor required while PagerDuty Operations Cloud is able to handle all the alerts first as an L1. There is a lot of money saved compared to the pricing or the license that we have spent.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is that pricing and license are good to go. Everything is perfect as per the licensing and pricing setup cost. There is no more suggestion I can provide based on that. We completely achieved whatever we are spending.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing PagerDuty Operations Cloud, we evaluated other options and chose Teams.
What other advice do I have?
We are using PagerDuty Operations Cloud to our maximum capacity and we appreciate the support that it has for continuing to learn from the issues that we have and to predict the outages or any alerts or whatever escalation is required. It can fulfill that.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud's embedded AI has significantly influenced revenue protection in terms of reducing alert fatigue and incident costs. We have improved a lot, and we have improved 25 to 27% of our overall incident management.
The alert reduction feature of PagerDuty Operations Cloud has a significant impact on preventing costly incidents in our organization. Alert reduction has been decreased as a result of removing false alerts. Earlier, we were getting 30 to 35 alerts per day. Now, there are only four or five general alerts that are genuine. That is a significant amount of alert reduction.
For others looking into using PagerDuty Operations Cloud, I would completely suggest that PagerDuty Operations Cloud is a good option to install or set up in infrastructure. It handles the infrastructure very well. I would rate this review nine out of ten overall.