Overview
GLPI Network is a professional distribution based on GLPI Project and other open source technologies, such as FusionInventory, and with : Advance Support Tier 3 by the official editor TECLIB, News and updates, Club for new features request, Local partners.
Highlights
- Inventory of datacenters, computers, peripherals, software and any associated components.
- ITIL ServiceDesk (end users, technicians)
- Softwares and licenses management
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Free trial
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
m4.large Recommended | $0.26 |
t2.medium | $0.20 |
m3.xlarge | $0.25 |
t2.large | $0.20 |
m4.xlarge | $0.27 |
m3.2xlarge | $0.25 |
m3.large | $0.24 |
t2.small | $0.20 |
m3.medium | $0.23 |
Vendor refund policy
TECLIB refund cancellation policy: If you are unhappy with our SUPPORT service for any reason in the first 30 days, TECLIB will refund 100% of your money.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/releases/tag/11.0.8 This release fixes several security issues that has been recently discovered.
Update is strongly recommended!
Additional details
Usage instructions
Instructions in customer portal on: https://services.glpi-network.com/aws-usage-instruction
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
BASIC Support (tier 3)
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

Standard contract
Customer reviews
Centralized inventory has replaced spreadsheets and now tracks every device and user assignment
What is our primary use case?
We also use it for diagramming the data centers, the racks we have, the location of the devices in the racks, the units they occupy, and the specific data for each server. We use the platform for inventorying IP ranges for the different environments, which allows us to link the IPs to the devices or to the inventory of the virtual machines we have loaded in the CMDB . This gives us exact knowledge of the free IPs that we have in the company.
Another valuable addition is the plugin for the Active Directory connector, which allows us to import the company's users and assign company users to devices such as printers, headsets, keyboards, monitors, and mice. This ensures we know precisely which devices a user has at their location that belong to the company.
What is most valuable?
The metrics are basically having exact knowledge of the inventory the company has. It also speeds up the time in terms of knowing what is assigned to a user. Previously we used to manage it with an Excel spreadsheet, but the spreadsheet could suffer a malfunction, some modification by a third party, or other issues. There was no version tracking, and that caused problems. With GLPI by Teclib, we were able to have knowledge of the changes that a device or an inventory item undergoes and to have this tracking. This ease allows you to work in a much more organized and simpler way without having to redo work.
I found a plugin developed by a third party that allowed me to make the connection to the CMDB and, through some filters, avoid creating external inventories in order to work with Ansible . Instead, Ansible directly consumed the connection data that I had in the CMDB, which greatly simplifies the task and allows you to avoid dealing with duplicates everywhere while centralizing everything in a single tool.
What needs improvement?
One of the more critical evaluations I have regarding tools is that they allow user validation for login against Active Directory or some public cloud SSO , and this tool already has that. I am not even using one of the latest versions; I am using an older version, so the latest versions surely come much more compatible. This allows and simplifies administration a lot on a day-to-day basis.
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
What about the implementation team?
What was our ROI?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
For whoever ends up reading this, GLPI by Teclib is a free, open source tool that really works very well and runs very well. I had already known it from a long time ago, and whoever does not use it is missing out on a great tool. I give this review a rating of 9 out of 10.
Ticket management has become organized and efficient but interface performance still needs improvement
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for GLPI by Teclib is for tickets to have order, and I use it for management too.
A quick specific example of how I use GLPI by Teclib for tickets or management involves using it for the OSH that was still set up for new in the JV; in engineer, IT needs for. I am a software license. Ticket creation is generated by an auto method where tickets are generated by GLPI via a mail received from the ARA, and the ARA will go to GLPI to action. I do the IT work, and I don't often set the category to request for a new hire, and I provide priority to GLPI automatic appraisal, service level agreements, and give the agent forty-eight hours to complete it.
This setup has worked for me as it makes my day easier, taking tickets in order and doing the management as well.
What is most valuable?
In my opinion, the best features GLPI by Teclib offers are the absolute best career tracking and the deep level of financial and comprehensive self-assessment.
GLPI by Teclib has impacted my organization positively as it helps me organize everything with VIP access. For example, the laptops here are VIP so I can add them by the active directory, which allows me to know if the PC is working or not. It is open source, and I can see how many laptops I have in the company, making it easier for me to manage the laptops in the organization.
Specific outcomes I can share include that GLPI by Teclib has helped me determine when the PC is open or not, and it has helped me when someone has a problem with their laptop.
What needs improvement?
GLPI by Teclib can be improved as sometimes it gets slowed down.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using GLPI by Teclib for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
GLPI by Teclib is stable for me as it works smoothly without any issues. Because it is in a private cloud, I do not need the Internet for it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
GLPI by Teclib's scalability is really easy. I can organize big items.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support for GLPI by Teclib is good. I did need help with support at one time for a ticket that I sold.
How was the initial setup?
GLPI by Teclib is deployed in my organization in a private cloud with no problem.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with GLPI by Teclib as it saves me time and work, and it saves money.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for GLPI by Teclib has been for one year so far, with a five-year setup.
What other advice do I have?
I chose seven out of ten because of some issues in the heavy font and architecture and internal organization and adaptation of the end user portal. Seven is the best rating for me.
Regarding its accuracy and reliability of output, I am not usually correct, but most of the time when I correct, the results are correct.
My advice for others looking into using GLPI by Teclib is that it is easy to work with. It is great and makes the work easier. The key is the customer support.
I gave this review a rating of seven out of ten.
Improved ticket tracking has reduced recurring issues and streamlined asset management workflows
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for GLPI by Teclib is for ticketing and asset management.
What is most valuable?
The best features GLPI by Teclib offers are the analysis for ticketing and following up with the SLAs. The tracking capability really stands out and helps us eliminate repeating issues.
GLPI by Teclib has positively impacted my organization by improving efficiency and workflows, especially after the monthly reviews. We are managing to eliminate issues.
What needs improvement?
A slight improvement in the UI would be nice. I know it is already simple, but it would be more user-friendly.
I see GLPI by Teclib as a perfect product, so besides the UI improvement I mentioned, there is not anything else I would want to see enhanced or added.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using GLPI by Teclib for four years, starting from my first job.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
GLPI by Teclib is very stable in my experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of GLPI by Teclib is excellent. Users are added automatically, and it can manage a large infrastructure, numerous users, and multiple features.
How are customer service and support?
We never had to contact customer support for GLPI by Teclib.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used ServiceNow , and we switched because it was offered as a free trial, allowing us to test it and see the differences in capabilities.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing GLPI by Teclib, I evaluated other options such as ServiceNow .
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using GLPI by Teclib is to always perform staging first to learn all the features and how to use them, then move to production.
Regarding the accuracy and reliability of output, we do not use any AI features. I believe the governance and security of GLPI by Teclib are solid since we do not use any AI capabilities.
I would rate this product a 10.
Centralized ticket and asset tracking has organized retail IT support and improves response times
What is our primary use case?
On a day-to-day basis, I use GLPI by Teclib with its email receiver feature, meaning that when the help desk team receives an email, GLPI takes that email and automatically opens a ticket, which is directed to the specific team, to the IT support team, and within the ticket it can be escalated to other IT levels and other departments.
In addition to the main use case of GLPI by Teclib, I manage a data center with three large racks, two server racks and one network rack inside the data center, and for the warehouse that has 880 employees, there are other racks. I have the registration and record of all IT equipment, entry, exit, maintenance, and the history of the equipment. This way I can have statistics, know what the need is, what the demand is. This speeds up my ability to know how many I should have in stock and what the recurring problems are and how to solve them. I already have a history there and information that speeds up and greatly organizes day-to-day work.
What is most valuable?
GLPI by Teclib has positively impacted my organization mainly with the stabilization of protocol, process, and organization of tickets, as I never lose a ticket anymore. There is not an activity left undone. I did not forget a task. They are all there, they all have to be done, they are all carried out. This way, no one is left waiting for support, and every time I respond, the customer receives an email to follow the status of their request.
The organization I have achieved with GLPI by Teclib has impacted response time and the satisfaction of internal or external customers based on the resolution of the problem, as they do not know the platform, they just send the email and communication is always by email.
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
What was our ROI?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
I would rate GLPI by Teclib a 10 on a scale from 1 to 10. I give it this rating because it solves many problems, it speeds up work a lot. It is very good at what it does and much better than others on the market.
GLPI by Teclib is implemented in my organization on-premises. I have it on-premises, and externally I only access it via VPN.