Remote devices have enabled accurate mobile regression testing and crash verification across platforms
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for BrowserStack is to verify or develop features and then verify how they will work on different platforms, specifically iOS and Android, including versions 14, 13, and Android 16, with different screen resolutions.
For example, I run the application on a device in BrowserStack, then open the log files to verify if crashes will occur, so I understand how the application or my feature performs well on specific devices.
For instance, if I fix issues and need to verify, or if I receive a specific issue from customers, I try to install the application on the same device with a similar iOS version and attempt to replicate the issue.
What is most valuable?
BrowserStack offers many devices with different platforms. For example, if there is an available beta version for Android or iOS, you already have access to such platforms, and you can verify how it will work for future releases.
I use the feature of testing on beta versions in my workflow all the time, checking how the application works on the pre-release build, and our QA people also verify and perform regression testing using the pre-release build on specific devices through BrowserStack.
BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization by saving money that would be spent on buying new devices. For instance, if there are many developers in the company, buying each new device costs more than subscribing to BrowserStack where you get access to many devices.
What needs improvement?
I think a possible improvement for BrowserStack could be adding features such as sending SMS or making FaceTime calls because, as far as I know, those features are not available at the moment. Additionally, it could be useful to attach some virtual phone numbers for specific devices and also consider integrating Apple Pay payments to verify how the application works on those platforms.
I would see such features on BrowserStack. I know there are many options such as virtual credit cards, virtual phone numbers, or virtual Apple Pay or Google Pay, and it is possible, but I do not know why BrowserStack still has not implemented them.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using BrowserStack for more than ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
BrowserStack is quite stable for me because it offers many different devices, is always up to date, and has a nice user interface with good user experience.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing BrowserStack, I evaluated another platform called Device Anywhere and also one more service, but I cannot recall the name of that service.
What other advice do I have?
As I mentioned before, some of our customers use specific devices with specific iOS versions, for example, iOS 16. Currently, I do not use this iOS 16, and if I need to replicate an issue, I install the build on this iOS version and verify the issue.
I do not know what device to suggest for others looking into using BrowserStack, but I think an iPhone 17 could be an option.
I chose nine out of ten because, as I said, if BrowserStack could enable making FaceTime calls and sending virtual SMS or facilitating Apple Pay payments, that would make it a perfect ten for me. I gave this review a rating of nine out of ten.
Seamless Multi-Device Testing with Efficient Automation Features
What do you like best about the product?
It supports multiple devices and now includes a parallel feature, allowing me to test scenarios on different devices with various operating systems simultaneously. There is also support for local BrowserStack. I also appreciate the App Live and Live Platform features, which make the Appium setup more efficient, enabling easier automation of mobile applications.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the device is not available, and the latest updated version is not up to date. For example, while most physical devices now have Android 16, BrowserStack still only shows the older version, Android 15.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The most important aspect for me is being able to check APIs using the network tab. This feature is crucial because, on a physical device running a mobile platform, we don't have that capability. It makes it much easier to debug issues on mobile platforms.
Browserstack - A must for Testers
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack enables me to deliver tests more efficiently thanks to its user-friendly interface and the essential features it offers. I use it nearly every week as part of my job to test web applications across various devices. My favorite aspect is the ability to run tests simultaneously on multiple devices, which makes multi-device checks much faster. The platform is very straightforward to use, and our organization has relied on BrowserStack since the very beginning.
What do you dislike about the product?
One area that could be improved is the occasional issue where certain devices fail to boot correctly or become unresponsive. Additionally, network or hardware-level problems can be difficult to replicate, and in these situations, physical devices sometimes reveal bugs that are not detected on BrowserStack devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing applications often requires access to multiple devices, which can be costly and inconvenient. Broswestack provides a wide range of devices, making it unnecessary to purchase them individually. This not only lowers the expense of acquiring devices for testing but also ensures that the necessary devices are always available when needed. Also the simultaneous devices where we can add multiple devices at once saves time by a lot.
Reliable and Scalable Solution for Cross-Device Automation Testing
What do you like best about the product?
The platform is highly user-friendly, which makes both navigation and test execution simple and efficient. Integration with frameworks such as Selenium and Appium is smooth, significantly cutting down on setup time. The customer support team is responsive and knowledgeable, consistently resolving any issues quickly. We use BrowserStack every day for regression and compatibility testing across a wide range of devices and operating system versions. Features like Live Testing, Automate, and App Live provide the flexibility needed for both manual and automated testing. The debugging tools, including logs, screenshots, and video recordings, are especially useful. Integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions works seamlessly, allowing us to automate our processes at scale without hassle.
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing can be somewhat steep for small teams or startups, particularly as you increase the number of parallel sessions. Occasionally, tests may encounter some latency, especially when running several sessions at once. Additionally, popular devices or operating system versions are not always instantly accessible during peak times.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cost efficiency is achieved by eliminating the need to buy and maintain physical devices or infrastructure. Time savings are significant, as quick access to a broad selection of devices accelerates both regression and compatibility testing. Improved test coverage is another benefit, since the ability to test across various operating system versions and browsers leads to higher quality and fewer issues in production. Scalability is also a strong point, with the ease of running parallel tests and integrating with CI/CD pipelines to support continuous testing. Additionally, the flexibility to support both manual and automated testing makes it adaptable to different project requirements.
Comprehensive Testing with Real Device Emulation
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to do design reviews of mobile application builds, and it helps me verify whether development matches the provided design. BrowserStack lets me view APK builds on different resolutions of mobile devices at the same time, reducing my time and effort. I appreciate that it gives the experience of testing on a real device, offering various mobile and desktop resolutions. It offers features similar to a real mobile device, like network and screenshots. The screenshot feature is incredibly valuable as I can take screenshots, verify them against the Figma designs, and create documentation for developers if changes are needed. This definitely makes my work better and provides proof of what changes need to be done.
What do you dislike about the product?
I noticed that when using multiple devices at once while testing an APK build, they don't sync properly if one of them is on an older version, like below V11. Also, the initial setup was a bit confusing and the UI can be better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for design reviews of mobile apps, verifying development against provided designs. It offers multiple device resolutions, saving time and effort. I also value the screenshot feature for matching designs and marking differences for developers.
Extensibility That Sets It Apart
What do you like best about the product?
extensibiility and ease of use and deployment
What do you dislike about the product?
complication when just starting off, number of features can be little overwhelming
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
compatibility checking
Effortless Automation Experience
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is the option to work on multiple mobile devices concurrently. This significantly simplifies cross-device testing and helps identify issues quickly and easily.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional performance lag and higher pricing are areas where BrowserStack could improve.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the difficulty of validating applications across diverse browsers and mobile devices without managing physical infrastructure. It benefits me by enabling parallel testing, faster bug detection, and confidence that the application performs consistently for all users.
Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Real Devices and Easy Automation
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack’s biggest strength is access to a wide range of real browsers and real devices, which makes cross-browser and cross-device testing much more reliable than emulators. It’s easy to start manual testing, and the platform supports popular automation frameworks, helping QA teams validate UI and functionality across environments with minimal setup.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance can be inconsistent at times, especially during peak usage, with noticeable lag on some devices. Automation debugging could be improved, as logs and error details are not always sufficient to quickly identify failures. Pricing is also relatively high, which may be challenging for smaller QA teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and OS versions without maintaining physical hardware. This improves test coverage, helps identify production issues earlier, and saves time and infrastructure costs while supporting both manual and automated testing workflows.
Streamlined Mobile Testing on Multiple Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack allows me to test my suites on multiple devices, all from one platform. It's great to have access to different Android and iOS mobile devices for running and testing my cases. The platform supports both manual and automation testing, which I find very useful. I also found the initial setup to be good and easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like that BrowserStack does not give complete use of AI. We can't debug and write any code to enhance our tests. I need some AI-generated features, like a copilot.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to run test suites on multiple devices, both Android and iOS, which streamlines my testing process across different platforms.
Access iOS Testing Without an iPhone
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack lets me test on an iPhone device even though I don't have one, and the initial setup was quite easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
If it can load the preview and the console faster, would be great
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack lets me preview on iOS devices and Safari browser without having an iPhone.
