BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,613 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Browserstack : Only the name is enough
What do you like best about the product?
My favourite tool is Live testing. I can really test on devices that i dont have access to normally and i know 95% the time that i can believe in those virtual devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think its the cost for me. If you need something less than 50 users, it is expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I check my builds on different devices with Live testing and it is helping me alot. Since i cant have all the devices and its very costly to have physical device.
Browserstack helps me with that.
Browserstack helps me with that.
Reliable cross-browser testing made simple
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing incredibly seamless. I can quickly test responsive design, legacy browser compatibility, and device-specific quirks without the hassle of maintaining an in-house device lab. It’s particularly valuable in fast-paced digital projects where time and accuracy matter. The platform feels intuitive, and real device testing provides confidence that what we ship will work for our end users.
What do you dislike about the product?
While the core features are solid, I occasionally find that session performance can lag slightly when testing older mobile devices, and automated test set-up can take a little while to get used to without strong documentation. A few more integrations with project management tools would also be helpful. That said, these are minor compared to the overall value it brings.
A few things to consider in your review (you may reference these explicitly or weave them into the text):
Ease of Use: Very easy for manual testers and QA teams to get up and running
Ease of Implementation: Straightforward; required minimal onboarding
Customer Support: Responsive, though usually only needed for rare technical hiccups
Frequency of Use: Weekly use in a project management capacity to support front-end teams
Number of Features: Covers all essential test cases across browsers, devices, and operating systems
Ease of Integration: Works well with GitHub and CI/CD pipelines
A few things to consider in your review (you may reference these explicitly or weave them into the text):
Ease of Use: Very easy for manual testers and QA teams to get up and running
Ease of Implementation: Straightforward; required minimal onboarding
Customer Support: Responsive, though usually only needed for rare technical hiccups
Frequency of Use: Weekly use in a project management capacity to support front-end teams
Number of Features: Covers all essential test cases across browsers, devices, and operating systems
Ease of Integration: Works well with GitHub and CI/CD pipelines
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack eliminates the need to maintain an in-house suite of physical devices or set up complex virtual testing environments. As a technical project manager working across multiple digital products, I rely on BrowserStack to give teams quick access to a wide range of browsers and devices, ensuring a consistent experience for users regardless of their platform. It’s helped reduce post-release issues, increased stakeholder confidence, and sped up our testing cycles considerably.
Easy to use but lacking in some areas
What do you like best about the product?
the accessibility scan is easy to use and gives good insight. But I think there are 2 areas need improvement, one of them is reporting. I think excel sheet is not a way to report. I think it should create a report with a screenshot and the issue next to it ( a presentation) the second thing, I think sometimes it misses some issues which I only notice when I manual check.
I love figma plugin as well. easy to use but not checking the image contrast unfortunately.
I love figma plugin as well. easy to use but not checking the image contrast unfortunately.
What do you dislike about the product?
I can't say dislike but figma plugin not checking the image contrast and scan missing important points are the areas that really needs to be fixed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can have an idea of the scale of the problem whether we have loads of issues or not much so from scan- I can have this idea
Mobile app testing- testing from testflight is such an amazing feature! Howeer I can only test in some phones only.
So it helps me to define the accessibility issues and a good guidance for how to solve these issues.
Mobile app testing- testing from testflight is such an amazing feature! Howeer I can only test in some phones only.
So it helps me to define the accessibility issues and a good guidance for how to solve these issues.
Lots of tool
What do you like best about the product?
The ability to not just spin up a mobile emulator but to actually connect to a specific mobile device (e.g. an Apple iPhone 11) is deeply helpful replicating specific issues.
What do you dislike about the product?
Takes some learning to understand it's capabilities.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps provide confidence that applications are running as expected.
Browserstack - Live, Visual Scanner and Percy
What do you like best about the product?
Number of features like Mobile Devices on Cloud, with Browser combination, Quick Customer Support, Friendly and flexible sales team
What do you dislike about the product?
Products like Visual scanner and Percy need more finace and clean outlook and UI and execution.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Multiple devices and Browser testing.
Visual Regression test for 200 websites using Percy
Visual Regression test for 200 websites using Percy
Useful for mobile testing
What do you like best about the product?
The ability to test on various mobile real devices, both in an automated and manual fashions. The logs, reports and screen recordings are very useful to understand the root cause.
Setting up the tool and configuring it within our CI/CD process was fairly smooth.
We use it on a daily basis.
Setting up the tool and configuring it within our CI/CD process was fairly smooth.
We use it on a daily basis.
What do you dislike about the product?
Percy integration isn't working as expected (the ability to custom the sensitivity to a specific percentage value is missing).
There's no way to configure an automated test (Appium) with a skipped/disabled/quarantined status (only PASS/FAIL are allowed).
There's no way to configure an automated test (Appium) with a skipped/disabled/quarantined status (only PASS/FAIL are allowed).
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The ability to test on various real mobile device (confirm functionality, find device/vendor specific defects, detect visual issues on specific screen sizes).
Solid Cross-Browser Testing Platform with Room for Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing incredibly easy and accessible. The ease of use is one of its biggest strengths—the UI is clean, intuitive, and well-organized, allowing even new users to jump in quickly. We use it frequently for testing responsive layouts, JS behavior, and UI consistency across multiple platforms without needing to maintain a complex local device lab.
The range of features is impressive: from real device testing to automated testing via Selenium and Appium, it offers a full suite that covers most QA needs. Integration is straightforward, especially with CI/CD tools like GitHub Actions, Jenkins, and popular testing frameworks.
BrowserStack also excels in ease of implementation. Setup is fast, and there’s no need to install anything beyond their secure tunnel if testing local environments.
The range of features is impressive: from real device testing to automated testing via Selenium and Appium, it offers a full suite that covers most QA needs. Integration is straightforward, especially with CI/CD tools like GitHub Actions, Jenkins, and popular testing frameworks.
BrowserStack also excels in ease of implementation. Setup is fast, and there’s no need to install anything beyond their secure tunnel if testing local environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is generally reliable, there are a few pain points. First, the performance can occasionally lag, especially with real device testing during peak hours, which slows down QA workflows.
The pricing model could be more flexible for smaller teams or projects with fluctuating testing needs. Additionally, while customer support is responsive, deeper technical issues sometimes require a bit of back-and-forth to resolve.
Lastly, some integrations—especially more custom ones—can require a bit of manual configuration and aren’t as seamless as advertised.
The pricing model could be more flexible for smaller teams or projects with fluctuating testing needs. Additionally, while customer support is responsive, deeper technical issues sometimes require a bit of back-and-forth to resolve.
Lastly, some integrations—especially more custom ones—can require a bit of manual configuration and aren’t as seamless as advertised.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the major challenge of cross-browser and cross-device compatibility testing in a fast-paced development environment. Instead of managing an in-house device lab or setting up dozens of VMs, we can instantly access a wide range of real devices, operating systems, and browser versions—all in the cloud.
BrowserStack App & Web Automation- A Robust Solution for Modern QA Needs
What do you like best about the product?
I used the BrowserStack Web Live product to test our projects. One of the main advantages of the Web Live product is its cross-browser testing feature. It was very useful for testing my web project across multiple browsers at the same time. Additionally, it helped me perform country-specific testing. Since my project is deployed in other countries like Zambia and Zimbabwe, I was able to test the web application in those regions as well.It is very easy to implement and also highly supportive for customers. BrowserStack is known for its frequent usage and ease of integration.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main disadvantage I noticed is that the free trial has a very limited time period. Another issue is that when switching from one browser to another, it always asks for login credentials again.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problem I was facing was country-specific testing and the ability to test our project across various browsers. BrowserStack solved that issue and is easy to integrate into the pipeline.
BrowserStack is Modern solution for all kind of QA needs.
What do you like best about the product?
This is very ease to use in day to day work life. And also there are so many features to use for the QA Automation. This is very ease to setup when you are integrating with automated test framework like selenium. And also this platform is well documented.
As a QA engineer I used this almost daily. It's play huge role in regression and cross browser testing. Their customer support is very good. you can easily interact with them and get the response within few hours.
As a QA engineer I used this almost daily. It's play huge role in regression and cross browser testing. Their customer support is very good. you can easily interact with them and get the response within few hours.
What do you dislike about the product?
As I identified the dislike point is free trial period is not enough.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
When we use pipeline it caused to occurred some errors. So we looking for a solution and then we found the BrowserStack and it solve our all the problems. Because it has CI/CD pipeline integration, screen recording facility and many more.
Interesting use
What do you like best about the product?
Platform versatility due to the quantity and variety of devices
What do you dislike about the product?
Slowness of Live, absence of support in Portuguese.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ease of use across various operating systems, browsers, and different devices.
showing 211 - 220