BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,600 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Browser stack is very useful especially for QA engineers for doing compatibility testing
What do you like best about the product?
Im basically QA Engineer where im supposed to do testing on multiple browsers , OS and multiple devices, for achieving it browser stack really helped a lot as we dont have to carry multiple devices and affording them also wouldnt be cost effective. With browser stack we are able to do QA on multiple browser and OS.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel connectivity and speed is bit slow
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is helping us in cost management. Instead of buying multiple devices we are managing testing on different environment using browser stack
Browserstack with Clubforce
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of use for the emulated devices
What do you dislike about the product?
The only major drawback for browserstack is the pricing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Load Testing and app testing are the main uses for us as we have a very large client base
BrowserStack is easy to use tool and are continuously upgrading
What do you like best about the product?
This product is incredibly easy to use, even for beginners. Its intuitive design and smooth usability makes tasks more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Lag and slowness: Testing environments can be slow to load, especially on older devices or with certain browsers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Multiple browser testing
Browser Stack is a tool for real device testing
What do you like best about the product?
Great tool for real device testing. App live allows for real device app testing. Easy to stepup and begin testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Limited reporting capability within the testing tool.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
.BrowserStack allows testers to conduct tests across multiple platforms in a single testing cycle, which helps reduce execution times. It enables testers to perform testing without needing physical devices.
Great for Multi-Platform Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I really like that I can test in different browsers on different types of devices. I only have Apple products and being able to test on PC is great.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it can take a little long to load a session.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Being able to access different versions of OS and browsers
Visual Testing improvements
What do you like best about the product?
Browser Stack Percy tool helped me to improve visual testing automation efficiency in my team. The results of the tests always help to find regressions for UI that I would not be able to notice myself.
The demo to other teams in a company pushed other teams also to start using the tool, making our UX team happy as well.
Very easy to integrate and implement with existing Playwright tests in any languages.
The demo to other teams in a company pushed other teams also to start using the tool, making our UX team happy as well.
Very easy to integrate and implement with existing Playwright tests in any languages.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some flakiness of the Percy tool sometimes, very minor, not blocking the process.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation of Visual tests, preventing regression and helping to improve approval process with UX team.
Useful for my automated tests
What do you like best about the product?
I like the possibility of having different devices available to perform tests on each one, thus covering the detection of possible specific defects. I also value being able to run automated tests without relying on an Android emulator or a physical device, which can sometimes be unstable.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I don't like is that when running an automation test and reviewing the text log in BrowserStack, the experience is not as complete as when directly checking the output.xml generated by Robot Framework. It would be ideal if there were an integration or session where BrowserStack could be fed that result, so it wouldn't be necessary to open another tab to view the final report.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
A problem I notice in BrowserStack is that the logs are not always as complete as those in Robot Framework, and sometimes starting a real device takes longer than a local emulator. However, this benefits me because in return I get executions in real environments, with videos, screenshots, and metrics that strengthen failure analysis, in addition to saving on the maintenance of physical devices and gaining scalability by executing in parallel.
BrowserStack broadens our testing capabilities anywhere in the world
What do you like best about the product?
I like the fact that I have a lot of mobile devices to choose from. It has saved us many times from having to acquire a specific phone to test for our clients.
What do you dislike about the product?
Limitation to do specific tests on mobile devices with apps that require camera usage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of having to acquire one or multiple physical devices and send it to one of our testers all over the world and so it benefits us with keeping a lower cost for this purpose.
Robust and complete testing tool with inovated features
What do you like best about the product?
The access to real devices to test, all the options from Android, IOS, the multiple testing products they are offering and the use of AI to automate testing
What do you dislike about the product?
The price is something why the companies can choose other options
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Solving the need of having multiple devices, we can find everything here and also have the option to automate, integrate with Jira, and see any log details in the execution.
Excellent integration with frameworks, but with room for improvement
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is an excellent platform for automated and manual testing, standing out for its wide integration with different frameworks like Playwright, Selenium, WebDriverIO, and Appium, which facilitates adoption within diverse QA teams. Additionally, I like that they constantly incorporate new features and updates that enhance the overall experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
However, there are areas that could improve. Currently, the retention of test results is limited to 30 days, which can be restrictive for teams that need audits or longer histories. It would be ideal to be able to configure the retention time in a personalized way. Additionally, at times, errors occur in certain modules, especially in Test Reporting & Analytics.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Allows running tests in the cloud, now time in the company's executions allows for easy cross testing.
showing 161 - 170