The user experience is really good. We can integrate other SaaS and other stuff, like the banking service SaaS.
BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,599 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Used for accessibility
What do you like best about the product?
We used this to test accessibility support for our application
What do you dislike about the product?
usability of the application is littel difficult
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps us to test accessibility and make our app 508 complient
Good tool for multi device testing, but the response is slow
What do you like best about the product?
Ii offers a variety of options when it comes ti multi device testing
What do you dislike about the product?
Testing manually on simulators is a time consuming task since the time response is too slow, which makes it complicated to complete an easy manual test.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Multi device testing
Expensive tool but continues to innovate in the QA space
What do you like best about the product?
For the most part, the range of products available and the ease-of-use in the platform in which you can carry those operations out is good. It's clear that Browserstack is a front-runner in the QA industry because they continue to re-invent and invest in new technologies to bring teams forward. Having one software to access multiple tools is rare and is something Browserstack do well.
Easy to integrate!
Easy to integrate!
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing options are not the most flexible and tend to cater to bigger organisations, costs in general are high as well. Clarity over the pricing of new tools like test management, observability before investing in trying out the Beta would be better.
I regret purchasing Test Observability so early on it's development phase as there's still many flaws, while they have good response rates from their support engineers, they haven't been able to resolve any issues after 6-9 months of investigation.
The stability of running tests in Browserstacks cloud environment can be poorer than running in a local environment.
I regret purchasing Test Observability so early on it's development phase as there's still many flaws, while they have good response rates from their support engineers, they haven't been able to resolve any issues after 6-9 months of investigation.
The stability of running tests in Browserstacks cloud environment can be poorer than running in a local environment.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Provides emulators to test our mobile app and web against when we need a variety of devices.
Provides an environment in which we can run our automated tests.
Allows us to move to a tool in Percy visual tests, and away from Applitools where we have access to more screenshots.
Visiblity over our autotest runs.
Provides an environment in which we can run our automated tests.
Allows us to move to a tool in Percy visual tests, and away from Applitools where we have access to more screenshots.
Visiblity over our autotest runs.
Mobile development required
What do you like best about the product?
Build are saved while not deleted
no need to log in again and again
no need to log in again and again
What do you dislike about the product?
console tab should open in app live product
idel time should `be increses to 1 hour
idel time should `be increses to 1 hour
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Already mention previous page
Offers wireless testing feature but challenging to replicate the real-time experience
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I have run the wireless testing process. The optimization in optics is good, and it automatically works well.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in pricing.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used it for a project for around three months, mostly for credit confirmation.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's stable. Many organizations go for the largest plan because it's stable.
I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. There's no lagging and jittering.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy. It's on the cloud, using real virtual devices.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
With respect to pricing, they are a bit expensive. I would rate the licensing model a six out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap. So, the price could be a bit decreased.
What other advice do I have?
Everyone has their own analysis. I advise them to analyze whether it's a good tool for their requirements before deploying it.
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten because it's difficult to replicate the way we experience BrowserStack on the spot on our virtual device. But because of its growing functionalities and features, we can't shift to multiple devices, so we have to go for BrowserStack.
Great platform to achieve cross browsers testing and mobile automation
What do you like best about the product?
Availability of real devices for mobile automation helps to avoid issue which emulators are susceptible to.
Browserstack provides integration across multiple Automation frameworks, CI/CD tools and Project management tools like Jira.
Browserstack provides integration across multiple Automation frameworks, CI/CD tools and Project management tools like Jira.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are some failures while executing Automation suite on slow bandwidth connection.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Providing platform to execute cross browser testing and providing mobile device on cloud to execute mobile Automation suite.
Nice exposures
What do you like best about the product?
Testing manualy in multple browsesr and devices platforms
What do you dislike about the product?
Memory for downloading the images using browser stack application
Unable to test the communication projects for VoIP issues
Unable to test the communication projects for VoIP issues
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing in multiple platforms and browsers by manual testing
browserstack is a good website for me and it help test out new website
What do you like best about the product?
it helpful for getting resourse so u can do work u love
What do you dislike about the product?
the time limits are not that great and for free it should like 30 minutes
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
By testing latest device that are coming and test if its worth time of buying
Good for starting and manual testing
What do you like best about the product?
App Live and network logs
Reporting and integration
Reporting and integration
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance metrics lack for automation suite
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Performance metrics
Lack of iOS devices
Lack of iOS devices
Real device experience
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack offers the closest experience to that of an actual device.
Using the device is smooth, and thus user interaction is easier
Using the device is smooth, and thus user interaction is easier
What do you dislike about the product?
Sessions on some devices last for a very short time if left unattended.
The console log is not visible in a few ios devices.
The console log is not visible in a few ios devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Using BS for testing when it comes to feature testing on multiple devices.
showing 151 - 160