BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,599 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Nice cloud solution for mobile testing
What do you like best about the product?
Diversity of mobile devices and their OS.
What do you dislike about the product?
Barcode/QR parse feature is still in BETA
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps me and my team to execute and test functionality on real physical devices.
Browserstack is a very good platform for testing.
What do you like best about the product?
Its help documentation is really really good.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing is there to dislike in browserstack
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is solving the remote browser test runs through pipelines
Browserstack allows greater flexibility within our agile frameworks for wider range of testing.
What do you like best about the product?
The fast simulation of browser functionality especially javascripting
What do you dislike about the product?
Browserstack had no features we dislike. It was very easy.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
javascript functionality simulation of our webapps.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
None.
All in one!
What do you like best about the product?
I get all the browsers handy both Android
What do you dislike about the product?
It requires more bandwidth and little difficult with low speed to use
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helps us in all of our testing needs
BrowserStack provides a way to test a wide range of browsers and devices.
What do you like best about the product?
As a software tester, BrowserStack helps me uncover issues that are only experienced on specific devices or browsers. Being aware of these helps improve our product's quality.
What do you dislike about the product?
Just like any other software, it also has some quirks like inconsistencies in the Device Information. BrowserStacks' support team however is very responsive when you raise a ticket so there's no need to fret.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I do not need to have physical access to multiple devices, they're a clutter, and I do not plan to acquire them at all because BrowserStack does that for me.
This saves us space and money.
This saves us space and money.
Quick and helpfull to share mobile devices same since before pandemic times
What do you like best about the product?
Today I use the services of WebdriverIO. The @wdio/browserstack-service lib is very easy and simple to use and management in the test project.
What do you dislike about the product?
Test execution in the cloud compared to on-premises is very slow. But if you use the tests with a CI, you don't have to worry about that.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
In my last position as QA, I worked in a small bank and for test mobile features both manual or automated was terrible because we had less devices than QA's. BS solved this problem brightly.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you don't know yet, create an account, they provide a few minutes for testing. I doubt you don't want to give up docker or of running your tests in browser headless
One place to testing your needs for Usability.
What do you like best about the product?
* It has All versions of Browsers for testing the Portals, and web pages that we are building.
* Similar to Browsers, we have real devices which are available for testing the Mobile App and automating the testing.
* Similar to Browsers, we have real devices which are available for testing the Mobile App and automating the testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
* Only drawback is the license part, I can take only one type of account with a single license. If including more than one I have to pay the multiple license fee. If this can be addressed one account can access one feature at a time would help many startups and companies.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
* It has All versions of Browsers for testing the Portals, and web pages that we are building.
* Similar to Browsers, we have real devices which are available for testing the Mobile App and automating the testing.
Our testing includes testing on various devices how they look and feel and the breakages and functionalities of the Apps developed.
* Similar to Browsers, we have real devices which are available for testing the Mobile App and automating the testing.
Our testing includes testing on various devices how they look and feel and the breakages and functionalities of the Apps developed.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you are looking for a quick and easy way for testing your websites and app this is the way to go.
browserstack eliminated the need of buying many test devices for our company
What do you like best about the product?
remote debugging feature is good, also being able to switch between devices helps us a lot. hearing audio from the device and browser video playback support became crutual for our testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
it would be nice if we can use multiple devices in parallel but i guess you do not there yet. also with some of the devices remote debugging hang, not working as fluently.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
we are developing a personalized video platform based on state of the art html5 and js. before browserstack we were doing tests in a limited variety od devices and that never was enough. with browserstack we do better testing and identify problems much easier.
Using browser stack took us to another level in terms of agility.
What do you like best about the product?
It has been a year since we changed the strategy of buying and using physical devices for Browser Stack and from my point of view it has been a successful strategy that has allowed us to have access to more types of devices and find more issues, even allowed us to make a considerable improvement in the deployment process for our APP due to the integration with Bitrise to facilitate and accelerate access to the builds. It allows us to work in a more standardized way since we all have access to the same devices at the same time, both QA and developers and even other departments have benefited. In general, it is not possible to physically have all the types of devices that Browser Stack allows us, including adding new devices that are coming to market and new versions of operating systems with the advantage that they are not emulators, but real devices that we can access remotely, regardless of the OS or brand, different viewports, including geolocation tools, simulation of different networks and some debugging tools. Al so a plus is the 24/7 support, always available to fix any issue ASAP.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes is very slow and we have to change to another device
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
-Integration with Bitrise to facilitate and accelerate access to the APPs builds: Before using Browser Stack, the process was very slow and you even had to register new phones to be able to install IOS builds.
-Availability and variety of devices: You always had to be buying devices such as cell phones and tablets, which is very expensive, and making constant updates. There were also not enough for the entire QA team and other teams that needed to use them.
-Standardization of processes and quality of tests: By not having the same access to all types of devices (Android, IOS, MAC, Windows), due to the small number of real devices, and the ineffective and inefficient emulators and virtual machines; the tests were slow and not as reliable as desired, and could not always be reproduced on other devices; therefore some of them would reproduce and others would not.
-Among other advantages
-Availability and variety of devices: You always had to be buying devices such as cell phones and tablets, which is very expensive, and making constant updates. There were also not enough for the entire QA team and other teams that needed to use them.
-Standardization of processes and quality of tests: By not having the same access to all types of devices (Android, IOS, MAC, Windows), due to the small number of real devices, and the ineffective and inefficient emulators and virtual machines; the tests were slow and not as reliable as desired, and could not always be reproduced on other devices; therefore some of them would reproduce and others would not.
-Among other advantages
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I recommend any team that needs access to the latest devices and versions of different operating systems to consider the cost benefits of using their own devices and using the advantages of Browser Stack and for sure in most cases, you will find that it is more advantageous to use Browser Stack.
One stop solution for all your real devices manual and automation problems, go for it.
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack is my favorite vendor for mobile manual and automation testing problems that I face on a daily basis, and I can say it's one of the best. The number of mobiles in their repo is great I can find what I wanted. i have used most of them and it helps me with the device testing coverage as well. The automation support on multiple simultaneous runs is very good and easy to work with. Their overall support is very good and reachable most of the time when we needed help. More than all these the platform is evolving on daily basis and they are listening to user problems and helping them and solving their problems which are very good and make lives better when compared to other products out there.
What do you dislike about the product?
One problem I faced is the app which we were testing we had an onboarding screen so in local real devices this was visible whereas in BrowserStack devices we could not see that and we reached out to support and could not get much help from them as well, and sometimes devices are too slow to load and interact with them. One other problem is it is challenging to test some of the apps as it is VPN supported and under a corporate firewall. Other than that we cannot video record a manual testing session, we need to do it externally with some other software which is painful. They dont have live chat support as well which is bad.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
They have real mobile devices in place and whenever we need we can access those and use it for both manual and automation runs, automation we run nightly and we get results in the morning for that we rely on BrowserStack a lot. The network logs and beta inspector for automation testing are awesome features that we use on a daily basis and help a lot our whole team and it is time-saving too. Other benefits are using BrowserStack we use lot of other features like live, app live, percy, speed lab and many other features are very helpful to us.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Go for it, one of the best in the industry, and you can test your mobile apps next level with this.
showing 1,231 - 1,240