Overview
AppGate ZTNA, an industry-leading Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution, puts your people first with simple, fast, secure connections to multi-cloud, on-prem, or legacy applications - from anywhere. AppGate ZTNA is a cloud-native, unified, API-enabled solution which delivers valuable security, efficiency and user experience benefits. Each user has a one-to-one encrypted network segment to each location where resources have been explicitly granted. Developers enjoy concurrent and automated access to multiple, disparate environments without waiting for manual access approvals. Admins can easily ensure that users have access to necessary resources, regardless of physical location or virtual segmentation.
This paid version includes a 100-user license and should be deployed as a single standalone ZTNA appliance. Hourly and Annual subscriptions of this product are available in the AWS Marketplace. Annual subscriptions provide a 9 percent savings compared to running the same product hourly for extended periods. Any customer usage above the number of annual subscriptions purchased is billed at the hourly rate. Contact support@appgate.com with any questions.
Highlights
- Enable all users: Consistent secure multi-tunnel access for anyone working from anywhere, whether in the office or remote
- Secure all devices: Reliable, easy secure access from managed or unmanaged devices of all makes and models
- Protect all workloads: Unified, multi-tunnel secure access for multi-cloud, on-premises and even your tried-and-true core legacy apps
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
c5.2xlarge Recommended | $2.00 |
m5.large | $2.00 |
c5n.xlarge | $2.00 |
m4.large | $2.00 |
t2.small | $2.00 |
r6in.8xlarge | $2.00 |
r7i.large | $2.00 |
m5.4xlarge | $2.00 |
m6i.xlarge | $2.00 |
m4.4xlarge | $2.00 |
Vendor refund policy
We do not currently support refunds at this time
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
Additional details
Usage instructions
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Please see the AppGate Support page for information on the details and level of support offered https://www.appgate.com/support This product will be supported through AppGate Federal's standard support terms found at
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Zero trust access has strengthened security and now streamlines remote work across all sites
What is our primary use case?
I work as a Cloud Operations Engineer at PowerSchool India Private Limited, and I have been using Appgate SDP for about four years. My company has nine sites where we use Appgate SDP before logging in so that we can access the cloud environment very efficiently and accurately without any hassles or disruptions from anywhere. We provide our credentials, authenticate, and log in to the application, connecting to all nine sites used in PowerSchool . My team utilizes Appgate SDP in the same way within the Appgate environment.
What is most valuable?
The first best feature that Appgate SDP offers is the Zero Trust architecture, which is the biggest strength. Regarding micro-segmentation, users can only see and access the applications they are authorized to use.
Appgate SDP has positively impacted my organization by strengthening our security posture and providing more granular control over access to internal resources we handle daily. The Zero Trust architecture and micro-segmentation have helped reduce the attack surface and minimize the risk of unauthorized access while improving the remote access experience and reducing reliance on traditional VPN infrastructure. Overall, Appgate SDP has enhanced visibility, simplified access management, and supported our security and compliance requirements efficiently.
What needs improvement?
The reporting can be improved, as Appgate SDP is strong but could benefit from enhanced reporting features. This would improve visibility and simplify operational monitoring, along with simpler initial deployment. The initial setup and configuration require a good understanding of Zero Trust principles. The user interface can also be improved, as the administrative interface and policy workflows would make day-to-day operations easier for security teams. Additionally, more AI-driven insights such as anomaly detection and automated policy recommendations would further enhance security operations, along with richer reporting and dashboard capabilities.
Regarding scalability, we can improve it for larger-scale deployments, making the platform more effective for growing enterprises and benefiting organizations with large and distributed user populations. Many users starting with Appgate SDP would see improvements from better centralized policy management for large environments and more efficient handling for large-scale deployments while improving monitoring and reporting across multiple regions. Additional automation capabilities would also support expanding infrastructures.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Appgate SDP for four years, and I started using it at PowerSchool.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Appgate SDP is very stable and efficient.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It has good scalability and supports our growing user base and infrastructure requirements. The platform's flexible architecture and centralized policy management help extend secure access across multiple environments, and as organizations scale, additional integrations, centralized administration, reporting, and automation further simplify management for large and distributed deployments.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is quite good. When we raise any case or issue, we receive a good response from them, and they often resolve our issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Earlier, we used a regular VPN, but since PowerSchool, I have been using Appgate SDP, which has been very useful and efficient for us.
What was our ROI?
There are several things that have helped our organization. Appgate SDP helped us save time and reduce operational costs by simplifying secure remote access compared to traditional VPN infrastructure and streamlining process management through policies. With the Zero Trust approach, we administer secure user activity without exposing the entire network. The centralized policy framework reduces the time required to provision and manage access, resulting in both time savings and improved security.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Regarding pricing and setup cost, everything is already pre-installed in my organization, so I am not sure about pricing details, as the other team handles it.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Appgate SDP a 10 out of 10 and recommend it to every company. It has overcome the VPN model, and Appgate SDP is currently in a thriving state where every organization is using it.
The multiple factors, especially the Zero Trust policy, stand out the most for me, which is why I recommend a 10 out of 10.
Regarding governance and security, Appgate SDP primarily focuses on Zero Trust Network Access where it controls access based on user identity and device posture, which helps strengthen security. Moreover, having advanced AI capabilities such as predictive threat detection and automated policy recommendations further strengthens the solution, making governance and security among Appgate SDP's strongest capabilities. This significantly improves our organization's security posture and enforces the principle of least privilege.
I have been using Appgate SDP since the beginning of my time at PowerSchool.
I strongly recommend Appgate SDP to every organization because it overcomes traditional VPN limitations. I strongly recommend Appgate SDP because of its scalability and Zero Trust platform service, making it highly suitable for various options. My overall rating for this product is 10 out of 10.
Zero-trust access has improved our secure VPN connectivity and protected internet usage
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Appgate SDP is for security purposes. We are trying to use it to connect with our VPNs and the network so that we can improve our organization's security.
A specific example of how we use Appgate SDP for security and with our VPNs is that Danfoss security team has implemented a no-trust policy, requiring everybody to install Appgate SDP with a default account. Whenever we start our system, it will automatically connect to the different VPNs through which our network is going. If it is disabled, we are unable to access the internet, as all our network goes through a firewall. If Appgate SDP is not connected to all of the VPNs, then we are not able to browse the internet.
What is most valuable?
In my experience, the best features Appgate SDP offers are reliable connectivity across different environments and strong policy-based access.
When I mention strong policy-based features, I mean that if I want to secure all the systems in my organization, I can apply a particular policy through which all the network has to go, making it easy to implement security compliance throughout the organization.
Appgate SDP has positively impacted my organization, as we are using it to securely access the internet after the cyber attack. After the implementation of Appgate SDP, I did not hear about any security incidents.
What needs improvement?
If I could change or improve anything about Appgate SDP, it would be to enhance the user experience by improving the UI so that it is more explanatory. Currently, the UI feels as though it is doing something behind the scenes, and at first sight, nobody can understand what this application is for. I think that is the main thing regarding needed improvements.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Appgate SDP for around two years.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that this whole thing is managed by the security team, and there are different teams involved, so I do not have knowledge about cost. I think it is important for security because if a security incident happens, you lose more money than you save.
What other advice do I have?
I do not have anything else to add about my main use case or how it is set up for my team. I do not have anything else about the features I find valuable.
My advice for others looking into using Appgate SDP is to use it, as it is a good application.
Helps us manage traffic-related issues and streamlines access management for the network
What is our primary use case?
We use Appgate SDP as a substitute for traditional VPN.
What needs improvement?
They could provide a single-box solution to manage tools for 4000 users. Additionally, they could add extra features to enhance remote micro connection.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Appgate SDP for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the product’s stability a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product encountered challenges accommodating the first 1000 users. We had to manage them individually, each with its unique code.
I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
Our experience with Appgate SDP's customer service and support has been generally positive. While we haven't encountered any critical problems requiring urgent resolution, the response to inquiries and questions has been satisfactory. They answer the queries shortly.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex for users who need to gain specific knowledge about the process. Once they grasp the knowledge, it is easy to deploy. It takes approximately two months to complete. At the moment, Appgate team is maintaining the product for us.
What other advice do I have?
Appgate SDP has significantly streamlined our access management, providing a notably efficient solution compared to traditional VPNs. The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal effort, unlike VPNs which often involve waiting for connection handling and unblocking. Recognizing the robustness of SDP, we made strategic decisions to minimize reliance on VPNs, reserving only two for administrative purposes.
In a scenario where Appgate SDP significantly improved our network security posture, the platform played a crucial role in fortifying defenses against major threats. The encryption algorithms utilized by SDP provide a high level of security to our network architecture.
Compared to Cisco, SDP proves to be most critical in protecting resources with the help of role-based policies. It only provides selective access to the application.
The dynamic policy engine significantly enhances our access control mechanisms. It has single sign-on and multifactor authentication features. It makes processes faster and easier.
It has helped our IT team to manage the workload with ease. It gives an intelligent solution whenever they face traffic-related problems.
I rate it a nine out of ten.
With the ability to build granular rules to access different applications, the solution offers stability and scalability
What is our primary use case?
I worked with the access of the NAC products for the last twenty years, and then there was a shift to cloud connection, and products like Appgate SDP were being used because the parameter was out, and we needed to understand how to connect the application in the hybrid work mode.
What is most valuable?
Firstly, the granularity feature of the solution allows it to build granular rules to access different applications. Secondly, the capacity to view the connection is another valuable feature of the solution.
What needs improvement?
The user interface should be improved as it is not very easy to work with the updates.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Appgate SDP for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In my lab environment, the stability is very good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
I directly contact Appgate's technical support and seek guidance from them. The support answers your questions very fast. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
For the initial setup, one needs to know if they want to configure the solution. It is not intuitive. When I started with the solution, it was not very easy, so I will rate the setup phase a five out of ten. After studying it and finding it easy now, I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten.
I only have a relation with the update in the lab environment, not the deployment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is according to the market price. It is not a very cheap solution. They have some very aggressive promotions to sell the product in the market.
What other advice do I have?
Firstly, one needs to understand the difference between a conventional VPN and Appgate because the application needs to have a one-on-one interaction with the user. The network view is the second step of the VPN, while the first is the interaction. Secondly, for the security of the solution, you need to generate a hard panel between the application and the user.
It is a good product. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
