Dynatrace (Private Offer Only)

Whenever we do any kind of performance or load testing with Dynatrace , we monitor the environment using service dashboards, deep distribution tracing, analyzing response time hotspots, method hotspots, and understanding the service flow while correlating all this with our load testing results and sharing the feedback with the stakeholders.

We don't use anything related to CI/CD on Dynatrace , but we use it through LoadRunner  Enterprise.

I find the classic service analysis, service analysis, distribution tracing, and the technology stack that it shows most valuable about Dynatrace, along with the Scape View. I'm unable to pronounce the exact name, but there is a Scaped View, Scaled View, or Scape View where I can see all the environments and how they are configured.

We use AI-powered anomaly detection from Dynatrace, specifically Davis AI log analysis.

The effectiveness of Dynatrace's user experience monitoring is very useful.

I'm using Dynatrace for full-stack monitoring.

I think Dynatrace almost looks good, but I believe we should improve how we can integrate with AI. I'm specifically looking at AIOps  and how we can monitor AIOps-related things, considering we have LLMs and all that stuff. I don't see those monitoring capabilities for NVIDIA chips, NPUs, GPUs, or anything similar, and maybe it has them, but unfortunately, I lack the knowledge to understand where I can view all those things.

I've been working with Dynatrace for nearly five years.

I would rate the stability of Dynatrace approximately between nine and ten.

The ability to scale and expand in Dynatrace rates around nine to ten altogether.

For Dynatrace tech support, we have a dedicated team here, which is easily reachable, so I rate it around nine to ten.

Positive

I'm not using AppDynamics currently. We used to use it, but now we are using Dynatrace. I moved to Dynatrace completely from AppDynamics.

Dynatrace is basically set up by a Dynatrace admin. OneAgent is installed on one machine, and the entire thing gets monitored through Dynatrace.

JMeter  and BlazeMeter  are the other vendors I'm working with. I'm only using JMeter  from Apache, not using Tomcat  or something similar.

The main benefit of Dynatrace is that it's easy to understand where exactly the issue is. When you see the PurePath, you know which particular machine or hop the application is having an issue with, allowing us to easily drill down to what is happening with the application. If something is happening on the UI, you want to understand what's wrong with the request, and to do that, you need to analyze Dynatrace to easily understand the root cause and where exactly you're seeing the issue.

The Dynatrace license is at the client's location; the client has purchased it, and we just use it.

Without any doubt, Dynatrace is preferable compared to AppDynamics. The main reason why Dynatrace is better is that you can see everything in one go; it includes log analysis, AWS  analysis, component level analysis, PurePaths, distribution tracing, real user metrics, mobile metrics, all in one particular tool, one solution.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Dynatrace a 10.

On-premises

Amazon Web Services  (AWS)

Our primary use case for Dynatrace  is full-stack monitoring. We use it to monitor the performance and availability of our applications, infrastructure, and services. It helps us quickly detect issues, analyze user behavior, and perform root cause analysis using AI-powered insights.

Dynatrace  has significantly improved our organization by providing full-stack visibility and automated root cause analysis. It helps us detect and resolve issues faster, reduce downtime, and improve user experience. The OneAgent simplifies deployment, and the AI-powered insights allow our team to focus on innovation instead of firefighting.

We use Dynatrace full-stack monitoring because it allows us to trace issues across the entire stack — from user interactions to backend infrastructure. It’s very effective for identifying where problems occur, making it highly valuable for end-to-end observability.

Dynatrace's user behavior monitoring and analysis also works well. It provides powerful insights into user interaction patterns, session behavior, and user experience metrics, which help us understand how our applications are being used.

One of the features I appreciate most is the OneAgent. We only need to install a single agent per host, and it automatically collects metrics, logs, traces, events, and more — without requiring multiple separate tools or manual instrumentation.

We also benefit from Dynatrace’s AI-powered anomaly detection. The Davis AI engine detects unusual patterns, performs root cause analysis, and sends smart alerts — all automatically, which significantly improves our incident response time.

More customizable dashboards

Better log search and retention features

Easier tagging and permission management at scale

Improved mobile app monitoring support

reduction in costpricing 

I have been working with Dynatrace monitoring and other monitoring systems for about three years. During this time, I’ve gained hands-on experience with full-stack observability, user behavior analysis, anomaly detection, and automated root cause analysis using Dynatrace.

Dynatrace is very stable and reliable. Its OneAgent runs with minimal impact on system performance, and the platform itself experiences very few outages. Regular updates and proactive monitoring by Dynatrace ensure high availability and consistent performance, which is critical for our continuous monitoring needs.

Dynatrace scales very well across different environments, from small setups to large enterprise systems. Its automatic discovery and instrumentation make it easy to manage thousands of hosts, containers, and services without significant overhead. The platform handles high data volumes efficiently and maintains performance, making it suitable for dynamic cloud-native and hybrid environments.

My experience with Dynatrace customer service and support has been positive. The support team is responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance for technical issues. Additionally, the available documentation and community resources help resolve many questions quickly. Occasionally, complex issues may require escalation, but overall, the support experience is reliable.

Neutral

We previously used a full monitoring system with Zabbix , which worked well but required a lot of manual configuration and maintenance. With Dynatrace, we benefit from extensive automation tools that significantly reduce manual effort. This automation is a key difference that sets Dynatrace apart from Zabbix  and other monitoring solutions.

The initial setup of Dynatrace is generally straightforward thanks to the OneAgent, which automates discovery and instrumentation across the environment. However, configuring advanced features, custom dashboards, and integrations can be more complex and may require some learning and planning. Overall, the automation significantly reduces manual effort compared to traditional monitoring tools.

Dynatrace is ideal for clients who need advanced, automated monitoring. However, some clients may not fully understand its value and might not need to invest in a high-end solution if their requirements can be met with free tools like Zabbix.

The SaaS version of Dynatrace is typically suitable only for proof of concept (POC) purposes. When customers commit to Dynatrace, they usually opt for the managed version for production use.

Overall, I would rate Dynatrace 9 out of 10 as a product solution.

On-premises

Microsoft Azure 

I see you did the research into Dynatrace  and OpenTelemetry  on the website. Are you an expert or user of this product? Let me confirm that you say you're just a user of Dynatrace . Are you a customer? We have your email as .

Could you mention some advantages of this product?

Some new features could be added to Dynatrace to make it better. Can you mention some examples of what new functions can be added to Dynatrace to make it better?

What about maintenance? Is it easy to support and maintain the product?

What about the stability of Dynatrace? Do you think the solution is very stable, or maybe you see some glitches or latency issues sometimes?

What about the scalability of Dynatrace? Do you think the solution is scalable or maybe there are some limitations on the scalability part?

What rating would you give to technical support from Dynatrace? 1 is bad support, 10 is very good support?

Positive

What about installation? Is it easy to install, or can installation be difficult?

Does the solution save you time and money? Is it effective for time and money or not effective?

If I would ask you to rate price from 1 to 10, where 1 is cheap and 10 is expensive, how many points would you give to it? Is price the main problem or do you have some other problems with the product?

Buenos días. I apologize for interrupting. This position is for an IT Project Manager. As for this review, we will publish it on the website on peerspot.com in written or audio formats. If you want to stay anonymous, your name will not appear with the review. You will get notifications and the use of the review is subject to PeerSpot's terms of use. You can access it at peerspot.com/tos. We can send you an email with all of this if you want to. The reviewer gave this solution a rating of nine out of ten.

We decided to integrate Dynatrace  primarily to monitor the availability and latency of our applications. We have a significant number of applications, and we needed a system that could manage their availability. Previously, we lacked evidence to show whether an application was available when a customer raised an issue. With Dynatrace , we can verify this information, even after a month.

Dynatrace offers exceptional features compared to other monitoring tools. It allows the creation of different dashboards related to application availability and server latency. The integration with Power BI for generating detailed reports is a standout feature. Furthermore, the automation of alert management, which integrates with ticketing systems to automatically raise and assign tickets, is a significant advantage over tools like Centreon . Dynatrace also integrates with AI tools to generate business reports.

When making comparisons with other tools, Dynatrace stands out, but it is a bit complex to understand and implement on servers. There are occasional issues with language and text, which can be frustrating. Despite this, it remains superior to Centreon .

I started using Dynatrace six months ago.

There have been no stability issues with Dynatrace. It is well-maintained and, being supported by cloud infrastructure, we have experienced no interruptions.

We have faced no scalability or reliability issues with Dynatrace. Everything functions smoothly.

The technical support from Dynatrace is excellent. Recently, we had an issue, and the support team resolved it within 20 to 25 minutes. Their support is very fast and effective.

Positive

In the past, I used Icinga  and Centreon. Compared to these, Dynatrace remains the top priority. Its features surpass the typical expectations for monitoring tools.

The implementation of Dynatrace was handled by a different team, so I don't have insights into their process.

The integration of Dynatrace has allowed us to monitor application stability and create business reports. However, I haven't quantified the ROI.

Dynatrace is known to be costly, which delayed its integration into our system. However, the advanced features it provides are unmatched, making it a valuable investment for organizations with a higher budget.

I highly recommend Dynatrace for organizations with a significant budget because it decreases resource costs and manpower. It is a versatile tool for IT organizations, providing features that are beneficial for comprehensive application monitoring. I rate Dynatrace a 9 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services  (AWS )

There are three major things that I look for. The first is that it is undoubtedly tier one, as per Gartner. This lowers the risk of product performance. Dynatrace has a good presence from an APM perspective, application performance perspective, where it can be easily configured. 

There are many adapters and solutions available in the market. In every organization, like ours, there are a few more built-in adapters. 

From an enterprise perspective, due to the higher cost, higher stability, and several considerations for high-level architecture, I take care of security perspectives, providing a stable solution. 

For system integrators, it is good from an operational perspective since there are many SLAs, so larger organizations generally opt for tier one solutions where they can have fewer operational issues, avoiding SLA penalties.

Graduation features offered by Dynatrace provide a single view and can connect with many other monitoring systems. Importantly, it delivers real-time insights. 

Additionally, Dynatrace positively impacts my organization in various ways.

There may be an issue since there are many tools like Splunk involved in network monitoring. From an IP perspective, Dynatrace is performing well. If they want to develop in network monitoring, they can, as it's part of their product line. It's not rocketry, so they can accomplish it. If I, as an SI, look at it from an enterprise perspective, considering the cost from the client, I prefer not to go with multiple systems, as they don't provide a complete 360-degree view. They need to improve on claims about being an enterprise system. The definition of enterprise is loosely used, however, from a holistic security perspective, including infrastructure, network, ports, software, applications, transactions, and databases, there are areas lacking, especially in network monitoring tools.

I have used the solution for the last four years, just for four years only.

Stability depends on the deployment, the person deploying it, and how the configuration is done. Generally, all are stable at ninety-nine point nine nine percent, but if the underlying infrastructure is not deployed correctly, stability may be problematic. This is a very relative term, and no software can exist alone at ninety-nine point nine percent. If the infrastructure doesn't support it, it cannot exist as standalone. Deployment location, whether in triple nine data centers, double nine data centers, or other types, also matters. If power is lost, stability is affected, depending on how it's deployed.

Scalability is easy. All opportunities work on the agent number and server transactions that need monitoring. If you include those things, some are agent-based, and some are agentless. The monitoring is done based on licenses, like tier or enterprise licenses. It depends on what the client is looking for. If it's an enterprise, increasing the number of instances doesn’t pose problems.

Their support system is good. I would rate them at 9.5 out of ten. People generally don't pursue it since it's a monitoring system itself. They have a good reputation, and the support is commendable. People are helpful, even with delivery and other related aspects. I use their excellent support system.

Anand, this is reflective work. These setups are complex, meaning significant thought is required. It's a relative aspect, however, developers could have clearer insights. Today, products in the market are packaged, just requiring configuration. Collecting logs, tagging events, and other aspects are relatively straightforward and not considered complex.

Determining ROI is subjective. Monitoring is passive, merely aiding business processes and not active within them. ROI is hard to specify; however, incidents like impending ransomware attacks highlight its value, though those are exceptional events. Return on investment in predictive analytics and AI tools is minimal, given the passive nature of these systems.

Clients sometimes opt for alternatives based on budget constraints. If the budget is small, tier two solutions like Elasticsearch may be considered. It varies by location, like in Singapore, where tier two solutions are viable options.

I give the solution nine out of ten. Enterprises typically choose Dynatrace, especially when the IT system budget is around a $100 to $200 million. Investing an additional $120 million makes sense. If your system is worth $50 million, the investment doesn’t exceed 1.2%. ROI considerations are tied to observability, dependent on how the business values these aspects.