ACCELQ
ACCELQReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
141 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
ACCELQ Makes Testing Easier for large-Scale ERP
What do you like best about the product?
I like that we can build tests without heavy coding. Our QA team handles a lot or ERP workflows, and ACCELQ made it easier to cover those without slowing down updates.
What do you dislike about the product?
The reporting could show more finance-related metrics, so we can track impact in accounting scenarios.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Before ACCELQ, regression testing took too long. Now we release update faster and with fewer error in critical modules.
Critical for Our Telecom Testing Needs
What do you like best about the product?
ACCELQ works across telecom platforms, APIs, and customer apps without requiring multiple tools. It's become a single hub for complex test coverage in a fast-moving environment.
What do you dislike about the product?
More built-in support for telecom-specific protocols would be useful. We sometimes have to extend configurations ourselves, which adds setup time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We've reduced downtime risks while rolling out new services. That has helped improve reliability for millions of customers who depend on our network daily.
ACCELQ Helps Us Keep Pace With Banking Compliance
What do you like best about the product?
The no-code setup lets our QA team quickly automate tests for both mobile apps and backend systems. Even non-technical staff can contribute, which makes the whole team more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
More native connectors for core banking software would be great. Right now, we still have to build workarounds for certain compliance-heavy systems.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We can now complete compliance testing in much shorter cycles while reducing manual errors. This helps us meet regulatory standards without slowing innovation.
Enabling Cross-Team Collaboration in Automation
What do you like best about the product?
The codeless approach allows engineer, analysts, and QA testers to work on the same test flow without silos. This has boosted collaboration between R&D and
What do you dislike about the product?
Dashboard customization could offer more layout flexible for technical and business users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Reduced post-release defects while cutting overall testing time in half , enabling faster product launches.
Bringing Our Global QA Teams Together
What do you like best about the product?
The cloud-native environment lets our global QA teams work together in real time.. AI-driven element suggestions are spot-on, which speeds up scripting and reduces flakiness.
What do you dislike about the product?
Would be great to see native connectors for some of the niche analytics systems we use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Improved test coverage for our research and analytics platforms without adding headcount, ensuring we meet release deadline every time.
Automation That Across Our Complex Environment
What do you like best about the product?
ACCELQ fits perfectly into our hybrid i database infrastructure. Whether it's testing packaged apps, API or legacy.
What do you dislike about the product?
Integration with older system needed more configuration time than expected.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We've reduced repetitive manual testing by more than 70% freeing our freeing our team focus on strategic delivery instead of endless regression runs.
ACCELQ gave our teams breathing room again
What do you like best about the product?
With ACCELQ, we built a complete test scenario that followed the patient journey end-to-end-from logging in on the app, to booking an appointment, to the back-end confirming it. And we did it without writing a single line of code.
What do you dislike about the product?
No tool is perfect. While ACCELQ has been excellent in term of automation capabilities, there are few areas I'd like to see refined. Reporting, for instance, is very detailed, but the dashboards can feel cluttered unless you customize them.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We had a mix of manual testing, homegrown scripts, and few off-the-shelf tools that never really worked together. We brought in ACCELQ during a major push to modernise our development cycle and reduce risk. At first, I was skeptical. Another no-code automation tool? We'd been burned before. But it quickly became clear that ACCELQ was different.
AccelQ automation tool helped us get started on our Automation Journey
What do you like best about the product?
- Excellent Support
- New AI functionality helps to add additional support to automating test cases
- Quick ramp up and non coding/scripting technical makes the tool easy to pick up and use
- New AI functionality helps to add additional support to automating test cases
- Quick ramp up and non coding/scripting technical makes the tool easy to pick up and use
What do you dislike about the product?
Execution a bit slow and lagging behind open source test execution.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use AccelQ to build our UI automation testing for several different applications. AccelQ actually helped us to setup our initial automation from scratch as our company had none and we had to quickly ramp up.AccelQ module based automation as well as quick and easy use helped the team quickly create automated regression test cases which helped our QA testing immensely.
ACCELQ Makes Quality Assurance Truly Collaborative
What do you like best about the product?
The seamless collaboration between QA, developers, and BAs inside ACCELQ really stands out. Storyboarding of test cases allows everyone to be on the same page, regardless of technical depth. Test case reuse also helps us maintain coverage across versions
What do you dislike about the product?
There’s a bit of a learning curve during the initial onboarding, especially if your team is used to traditional scripting tools
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It has closed the gap between requirement definition and test coverage. We now identify bugs earlier in the cycle and spend less time on redundant manual tests
From flakly tests to smooth,reliable runs
What do you like best about the product?
Self headling test ,CI/CD integration consistent and reliable test run
What do you dislike about the product?
Barely a learning. Curve.Otherwise everything is good
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Unrealable, flakly tests affecting release confidence
showing 41 - 50