ACCELQ

What do you like best about the product?

ACCELQ stands out for its no-code automation, self-healing tests, and end-to-end (UI, API, mobile) coverage — all in one platform. It’s easy to use, integrates well with CI/CD, and greatly reduces test maintenance.

What do you dislike about the product?

ACCELQ can be costly and has a learning curve for full mastery. It sometimes struggles with complex or custom UI scenarios, offers limited customization in reports and workflows, and may show performance issues with large test suites. Desktop automation support is also relatively weak compared to its web and API coverage.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

ACCELQ solves key business problems like high testing costs, slow release cycles, and poor collaboration between QA and development teams. By automating tests without coding and enabling self-healing capabilities, it helps businesses release products faster, improve software quality, and reduce operational costs tied to manual testing and maintenance.

What do you like best about the product?

We needed both frontend and backend testing, and all the scheduled tests needed to run locally on our own servers, due to safety concerns for customer data, and AccelQ could give us that.
Been easy to learn, and little technical insight is needed to also cover more detailed and backend testing on my own with predefined commands. Whenever I've run into problems or needed assistance on how to solve a task, I've always gotten quick help from support to find a solution. Scheduled tests are predictable, and we are catching more bugs than before at an earlier stage, with an average of 1-3 per week.

What do you dislike about the product?

I'm missing more flexibility in views to work with and compare more in parallel to work faster. Also missing more focus on time management of the tests, but have hopes that the new dashboard with it's flexibility in setup also will cover this over time. Used to miss a recording option, but that is also now covered, and I like the easy switch between recording and not recording to be able to better change where in the test I need to continue working.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

In testing our software, having tests covering both frontend and backend in the same flow has helped us to also catch the bugs that initially were not visible if only tested on frontend or backend separately.

What do you like best about the product?

It's easy for our QA team to create and reuse cases for different systems without coding.

What do you dislike about the product?

Some complex flows required extra effort, but it's still much faster than manual testing.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

We reduced errors in point-of-sale and online checkout systems, ensuring customers have a smooth experience.

What do you like best about the product?

The reusability of test components is a lifesaver. Our checkout and product catalog undergo frequent updates, but instead of rewriting tests, we can quickly reapply existing components with minimal changes. The codeless design also helps store IT staff get involved in testing without needing deep technical knowledge.

What do you dislike about the product?

The User Interface, while functional, feels slightly dated compared to some modern SaaS platforms. It's nota a deal breaker, but a refresh would improve user experience

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

It helping us reduce the number of issues that reach customers. Previously, manual testing missed edge cases in checkout, which led to abandoned carts. With ACCELQ, we have automated end to end flows that catch these errors earlier. It also supports testing across both our online and mobile app, giving us confidence before every release.

What do you like best about the product?

ACCELQ's unified platform allows us to automate, web, mobile, and backend testing in one place. The codeless design makes onboarding new tester very simple.

What do you dislike about the product?

Mobile test setup required more effort compared to web and API automation.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

It reduced manual testing for patient booking and insurance claims system by more than 50%