Reviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
185 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
IBM MFT est bon pour notre cas d'utilisation.
Qu'aimez-vous le plus à propos de the product?
MQ offre une solution décente pour les transferts de fichiers. Les transferts sont généralement rapides.
Que n’aimez-vous pas à propos de the product?
MFT semble parfois être un peu une réflexion après coup. Il n'y a pas beaucoup de fonctionnalités excitantes pour MFT annoncées. Nous avons eu des problèmes avec des bugs et des transferts qui ne passent pas, mais il ne semble pas y avoir de journaux écrits.
Quels sont les problèmes que the product résout, et en quoi cela vous est-il bénéfique?
Nous devons déplacer de nombreux fichiers volumineux à travers différentes plateformes, centres de données et nœuds de stockage. IBM MQ nous aide à le faire rapidement et en toute sécurité.
The best in messaging
What do you like best about the product?
I particularly like the robustness of MQ as a messaging solution for diverse applications on multiplatform
What do you dislike about the product?
I love everything that MQ offers and there is nothing that I dislike about MQ
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
INtegration
IBM MQ is a solid and established messaging middleware
What do you like best about the product?
As a 14+ year user of IBM MQ, the feature I like the most is the continuation of features available in the first versions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Beyond the basic functionality (queues, channels, listeners, etc) sometimes IBM MQ is not bug-free. An example is the use of multi-instance queue managers and NFS v4 shared file system.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have built an elaborate solution for a healthcare customer that uses MQ to carry messages from front-end systems to the back-end. Examples are a message when a patient is admitted to a hospital and when lab results are delivered to a doctor.
Manager of Middleware Services (including MQ)
What do you like best about the product?
We use IBM MQ for critical production workload and has been rock solid. We rarely have to open cases with IBM for support.
What do you dislike about the product?
Advanced Message Security use case seem to be limited and not widely adopted.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Reliable messaging.
Messaging Master "MQ"
What do you like best about the product?
MQ - ease of use , guranteed delivery , no failures , stable prodcut
What do you dislike about the product?
not up to the mark specific to cloud native
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
for real time and batch messaging without message loss
Recommendations to others considering the product:
ease of use , gurentted delivery , no failures and compatible with mnost of leading produts and clouds
Possibilité MQ
Qu'aimez-vous le plus à propos de the product?
Lorsque nous avons examiné l'utilisation de MQ avec notre configuration B2B Integrator, nous avons vraiment apprécié la rapidité et le débit qu'il nous offrirait par rapport à nos méthodes de transfert basées sur le système de fichiers traditionnel. La capacité de relecture était excellente et nous étions vraiment enthousiasmés par la possibilité de l'utiliser.
Que n’aimez-vous pas à propos de the product?
Nous faisons beaucoup de FIFO (98 % des données) et nous n'avons pas pu obtenir l'isolation client que nous voulions en utilisant MQ et les files d'attente FIFO intégrées de SI.
Quels sont les problèmes que the product résout, et en quoi cela vous est-il bénéfique?
Se débarrasser de l'utilisation des systèmes de fichiers pour le transfert de données dans les deux sens.
MQ & CICS
What do you like best about the product?
I admire how the MQ application interacts with CICS. Its quite fascinating how the CICS-MQ adapter from CICS communicates with MQ as an external resource manager. With this technology this allows companys to keep track of the millions of CICS transactions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing really, its a great tool for CICS.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
None at the Moment
Integration Architect
What do you like best about the product?
Wide platform support to integrate almost any-to-any
What do you dislike about the product?
Did not transform with the industry to support API. Now enterprises are using MQ, but are forced to build custom application layers or use additional products like Datapower and such to provide http endpoints.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Integration into legacy M/F applications and thus leveraging core business apps developed earlier.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
IBM should help existing investment to be useful
Reliable message
What do you like best about the product?
Simple to configure on distributed platforms
Simple administration
Wide platform support
Secure
Reliable deliver once message
Programming interfaces for all the widely used development languages
Simple administration
Wide platform support
Secure
Reliable deliver once message
Programming interfaces for all the widely used development languages
What do you dislike about the product?
Message monitoring needs to be made simpler
Lacks usage/SLA alerting
Lacks usage/SLA alerting
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Async integration
Supporting micro services
Supporting micro services
IBM Product Review for MQ
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use light weight, easy deployment and redundancy
What do you dislike about the product?
too expensive, should be able to compete with Rabbit MQ... and not make it as IIB
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
File transfers between internal apps
showing 161 - 170