Universal Automation Center
StonebranchReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
129 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Stonebranch UAC 7.3
What do you like best about the product?
I like that we can focus on creating solutions instead of infrastructure maintenance. I also like the availability of all the different integrations without incurring additional licensing/costs.
What do you dislike about the product?
The least appreciable thing would be the internal storage of Credentials. Nobody likes it when the password expires.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Stonebranch is helping with our Cloud Computing migration.
This has been an amazing experience
What do you like best about the product?
It is clear and easy to understand. The UI is user friendly.
What do you dislike about the product?
None. Honestly, I don't dislike anything about Stonebranch
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is helping me to schedule the integrations that I want to and assigning triggers to it so that I can run the job at a particular time. Stonebranch has UAC jo scheduler
A better product for Visual Centralized scheduling & processing
What do you like best about the product?
The idea is that it's so scalable. The method of billing and knowing that there is only one platform that it is designed for. Example: we can utilize this product on our AS400, or on any Windows Server.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is a bit of a learning curve, originally. When we installed it, I created a simple program to check all active jobs, then an output. The primary issue I have with Stone Branch would have to be simply absorbing the spooled file output (print outs) then removing them on the host by default.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Our scheduled jobs on the (C)IBM AS400, is clunky and for an inexperienced user, would look allot like a Dos Editor. Stone Branch brings to the table a new method of scheduling our Workload Automation, with a better more modern GUI interface, even though it is communicating with a platform that is unaware that Stone Branch is making the function and program calls.
Production Analyst
What do you like best about the product?
Functionality is perfect for our environment.
What do you dislike about the product?
Ease of use viewing or editing Predecessor/Successor in a workflow. Names are truncated
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
nothing to note
Stonebranch Online 2022 excellent training opportunity
What do you like best about the product?
Stonebranch's online training is an outstanding chance for the community to get together in person or virtually and learn about new ways to use UAC.
What do you dislike about the product?
No downside to this training, especially since it can be attended virtually for 2 hours a week.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
By being able to hear from both Stonebrance technical experts and also user community experts, you are learning from different view points.
Great workflow tool and intergration with peopelsoft
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use ans setup new workflows that include processes from any system we use
What do you dislike about the product?
Little difficult to figure out the best way to make some dependencies work but there is genreally a way to do it
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
we use it for workflow automation works especially well for process that depned on each other that are from seperate systems
Manager - IT Production Control
What do you like best about the product?
The flexibility related to batch scheduling and orchestration in a hybrid cloud environment. There are solutions for legacy scheduling and an array of options for new cloud capabilities.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would like to see an option for cloud customers to be able to edit/manage schedules from the xml code.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cloud scheduling options for a multi-cloud environment.
Very good software
What do you like best about the product?
Reliable, easy to use and offers a lot of features.
What do you dislike about the product?
The latest version 7.3 is less pleasant to use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The automation of tasks allows us to lighten our workload.
My experience with the stonebranch solution
What do you like best about the product?
The stonebranch solution is a platform-independent solution with modern interfaces to cloud applications
What do you dislike about the product?
I haven't noticed anything negative at the moment
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
With stonebranch, we were able to migrate all of our applications to the cloud quickly and efficiently
Recommendations to others considering the product:
For me the best alternative for file transfer and scheduling to the special mainframe architecture
Stonebranch's UAC, excellent tool for running our replatformed batch
What do you like best about the product?
The incredible amount of possibilities to basically plan and run anything you like
What do you dislike about the product?
I lack the background knowledge of the Linux system where UAC is running to fully profit from what the tool offers
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We needed to plan and run our mainframe batch on the new Linux Platform
showing 61 - 70