
Harness Cloud Cost Management
Harness IncReviews from AWS customer
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Using diverse deployment styles ensures zero downtime and simplifies onboarding while managing errors and secrets efficiently
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
What about the implementation team?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
It has been flexible enough to meet our needs
Easy to use and rollout changes safely
A flagship, and fully featured, feature flagging platform
Glad to use the platform
Good platform for feature flag based experiments.
Good to know there are a lot of attributes to decide targeting.
Easy to use and implement in the project.
Good use of integrating client side and server side SDK.
Good docs and support.
Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring
What is our primary use case?
I used Harness for CICD, and it served as the release platform that our team used for Java applications. We do Java microservices, and we used it to deploy them.
How has it helped my organization?
Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient. It allows monitoring of deployment status and directs me to logs, making it easy to find bugs, saving us a lot of time.
What is most valuable?
Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.
What needs improvement?
Previously, when deploying a version that had been deployed successfully before, it sometimes failed upon trying again, which seems to be an intermittent issue about stability. I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used it for about a year, but the last time I used it was six months ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable. Adding more services decreases stability.
How are customer service and support?
I mainly get assistance from within my company, not directly from Harness' technical team.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I used uDeploy from IBM. We migrated from uDeploy to Harness due to an update in our company software, transitioning from TeamCity and uDeploy to Tekton and Harness. Harness is more user-friendly with a lower learning curve.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was easy to do. I just needed to add a YAML file to my applications and get management approval.
What about the implementation team?
I was in charge of implementing our company's Lightspeed integration with Harness and Tekton.
What was our ROI?
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend Harness as it's better than uDeploy in terms of ease of use and functionality. It supports multiple pipelines, multiple environments, different service configurations, and has a user-friendly dashboard.
I's rate the solution eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Streamlined deployment with reduced manual intervention while helping to define environments
What is our primary use case?
We use Harness as a deployment tool. It allows us to define environments like OpenShift or Kubernetes or Linux servers.
It automates the pipeline system where users can trigger with the master branch. We use Tekton to run without any manual interaction. Once the build is done, it stores artifacts in JFrog, and Harness detects them automatically and executes deployment.
How has it helped my organization?
Harness has been much faster and user-friendly for the end user for deployment purposes. It allows us to do changes in the build stage during deployment, making processes more efficient.
Harness also allows for modifications at the YAML level, which is beneficial for our pipeline and deployment processes.
What is most valuable?
Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption.
It facilitates deployment by allowing a user to push their code into GitHub or Bitbucket and have it deployed without manual management intervention.
What needs improvement?
Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals. If this is corrected, we could have a totally automated pipeline. Otherwise, we need to use GitLab or GitOps to trigger automatically with every commit.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Harness for four to five months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Harness is stable. There is no high latency or deployment delay, and it has proven to be reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Currently, we are scaling up the pipelines with Harness, which provides functionality to achieve this without any significant issues.
How are customer service and support?
There is a dedicated team within the organization to handle incidents and issues with Harness, so we don't need to rely on external support much.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were previously using a different tool for deployments which had its limitations. Now, we use Tekton for continuous integration and Harness for deployment.
How was the initial setup?
There were no significant challenges with the initial setup. We had a dedicated team for the implementation and were able to get support when needed.
What about the implementation team?
For the implementation, there was a dedicated team handling Harness, which made the process streamlined.
What was our ROI?
Harness offers a user-friendly deployment experience with faster processes compared to the previous tools we were using.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I do not have information on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing as I am working for a client, and it is handled at the organizational level.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have evaluated Jenkins and Tekton for continuous integration, yet Harness is used for deployment.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend Harness to other users. As part of the engineering team, my role includes certifying products for applications, and Harness has proven suitable for our needs. I suggest adopting it based on usage requirements.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.