My main use cases for OneLogin are the single sign-on feature, multifactor authentication, and the user provisioning feature that we are using in our organization in real-world scenarios.

We use user provisioning when a new employee joins the organization. OneLogin has made the onboarding process easy and streamlined it significantly through our HR system. Regarding single sign-on, we use it for multiple applications, including project management tools, communication platforms, and development tools.

We are using OneLogin primarily for the sign-on functionality.

The best features OneLogin offers are multifactor authentication, single sign-on, and directory synchronization.

The directory synchronization feature for my organization integrates with existing systems. It integrates with another directory system service such as Active Directory and automates the addition of new users or updates to existing ones.

The customizable access policies that OneLogin offers are crucial for our organization. OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by increasing efficiency in user onboarding. The multifactor authentication has enhanced our user experience, as users are no longer using the forgot password option every time. With multifactor authentication, users only need to authenticate once, and with single sign-on, they only need to authenticate one time and then can access other applications.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality is that it has made things easier for us. When a user is updated in our primary directory, the synchronization automatically updates the corresponding records in other directories as well. This has reduced the manual workload for our IT team.

I would suggest that the user interface could be improved. Everything else is good, including customer support, and dashboard customization would be a great addition.

I do not have any additional improvements needed with OneLogin that I have not already mentioned.

I have been using OneLogin for around a month.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin scales with us for our growing startup.

I did not previously use a different solution before OneLogin.

We are using SmartFactor Authentication, but right now I cannot provide a review on it because we are still configuring it. The integration of phishing-resistant devices has made a significant impact on authentication processes, but I will say we need more time to justify it fully. We are still implementing it and need more time.

I have seen a return on investment so far, and time has been saved on our side. The automation workflow that we are using has removed the manual workflow that we were using, and the time required has been reduced.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated other options such as Okta.

OneLogin is a great platform with minimal improvements needed. I rate OneLogin a nine out of ten. I chose nine for my rating because the user interface could be improved to a ten out of ten. Every other feature, such as single sign-on and multifactor authentication, is excellent. My advice to others looking to use OneLogin is that it is a good platform that you can confidently use. Just be sure to read the documentation correctly before using it. I found this interview valuable.

I have been using OneLogin for about a month, and it has been a valuable experience as I have seen it integrate with our existing system and enhance our overall security posture. One of our main use cases is streamlining user access across multiple applications, and the Single Sign-On feature has been a game-changer for us. It simplifies the login process for users, allowing them to access various applications with just one set of credentials. Additionally, we are leveraging Multi-Factor Authentication to add an extra layer of security, which has been crucial given the sensitive nature of the data we handle.

Integrating OneLogin with our existing systems was an interesting process. We primarily focused on a few applications that our users access frequently, including project management tools, internal communication platforms, and customer relationship management systems.

One of the standout features of OneLogin for us is definitely user provisioning and de-provisioning. It has made onboarding and offboarding processes much smoother.

The features I would highlight include directory sync, customization options, and Multi-Factor Authentication. First and foremost, the Single Sign-On feature has truly transformed how our team interacts with various applications. By allowing users to log in with just one set of credentials, we have seen a noticeable reduction in password fatigue. This not only boosts productivity but also minimizes the frustration that comes with remembering numerous passwords. I remember a time when our team was constantly juggling passwords, and it was a source of stress. Now, with SSO, the workflow is much smoother. Multi-Factor Authentication has also enhanced our security posture.

Since implementing OneLogin, the reduction in password requests has been notable, with the Single Sign-On feature driving approximately a 70% reduction in those requests. The seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating on applications with OneLogin is remarkable. An end user can access multiple applications with just one set of credentials, which not only saves time but also minimizes the frustration that often comes with handling multiple passwords.

The user experience of OneLogin can be improved. The user interface and the integration with third-party applications could use some work, as could enhancing the reporting and analytical features.

I think customer service can be improved along with the user interface and integration.

I have been using OneLogin for about a month.

OneLogin is stable for us.

OneLogin is a scalable solution for our organization, and we have been able to see new user growth.

We have not used customer support much until now, but when a problem arose, we contacted them and they were responsive and helpful. They were taking a bit more time than ideal.

We have not used any other solution before OneLogin. The company is still in development mode, so OneLogin is our first tool.

We have saved time with OneLogin, and we are still using it as we continue configuring and determining how useful it is.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was quite good.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated Okta as an alternate solution.

My advice for others looking into using OneLogin is that it is a good product. I recommend using the free trial so that you can explore all of its features before purchasing the full version. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

I primarily used OneLogin for proof of concept to showcase potential customers its use cases. I tried almost all of the use cases that OneLogin supports, from integrating with directories and target systems to using SAML and providing entitlements. I demonstrated the onboarding cycle as a specific use case to a customer with OneLogin.

I use OneLogin's SmartFactor Authentication to adjust authentication flows in real time, and I assess SmartFactor Authentication as very good. It is one of the best tools they created.

SmartFactor Authentication stands out for me because it supports no compromise. Usually, there is either a compromise of user experience for risk or a compromise of risk for user experience. With SmartFactor Authentication, I can balance between them. I can give users an easy and smooth user experience as long as the risk indices are low, but I can implement pretty rigid authentication workflows if the risk gets higher. So it is very good.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is very nice. It is very easy to implement and very easy to use. There is nothing bad about it. The synchronization runs smoothly.

My impression of OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is that it is very nice.

The user experience is very nice, which is why I give OneLogin a rating of seven. It is easy to implement and incorporate in any enterprise, and you can define the ROI pretty fast. However, the downfall rests with the lack of an on-premises solution or cloud in some areas, which prevents OneLogin from accessing some significant markets. Additionally, the weakness of their CIAM module is a concern.

There are no other improvements I think are needed for OneLogin.

I used OneLogin for around three years, but it was not continuous usage. I conducted several POCs with it.

My experience with OneLogin's stability has been positive.

OneLogin's scalability is great in my experience.

I do not have any comments about the customer support.

I did not switch to OneLogin from a different solution because I used OneLogin initially.

Unfortunately, I do not have any numbers right now regarding whether I have seen a return on investment with OneLogin or any relevant metrics such as time saved, cost reduction, or fewer support tickets.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin was very nice.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated other options such as PingFederate. It is very resourceful and very good, but the problem is that it is very complex. For very big enterprises, it is one of the best solutions. It has huge diversity in hosting and deployment options. You can deploy it on-premises, in the cloud, or through other methods. It can provide much stronger customization. However, it is much more difficult to onboard in the enterprise. For smaller enterprises that have standard requirements, OneLogin is much better. It is much more efficient and easier to use.

I have used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, and while I do not remember all of the details, I believe it was a very useful experience. I give OneLogin an overall rating of seven.

My main use case for OneLogin revolves around application integration and user authentication. I primarily utilize it to implement Single Sign-On across internal and external applications, which significantly simplifies the login process for users.

I use OneLogin for Single Sign-On with an internal project management tool that our team uses alongside a customer relationship management CRM system. Before integrating OneLogin, users had to remember separate login credentials for each application, which was a hassle and often led to frustration. The process has become much smoother with login pages, authentication, and access granted.

The best features OneLogin offers are Single Sign-On, multiple Multi-Factor Authentication, and user provisioning.

Multi-Factor Authentication is generally useful for adding an extra layer of security, which is crucial, especially for the sensitive nature of the data we handle.

OneLogin has had several positive impacts on my organization in several key areas. Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication have been beneficial. Additionally, the user authentication has been improved remarkably. Before OneLogin, our team was burdened with managing multiple credentials, but now it is much more efficient.

Since implementing OneLogin, I have been seeing a significant reduction in login-related support tickets, approximately a 30% decrease.

I do utilize Smart Factor Authentication with OneLogin. I find it to be a really valuable feature for balancing security and usability.

OneLogin can add more analytics and reporting and integrate with more third-party applications.

I have been working in my current field for a year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is a good scalable product.

Until now, it is great. I have not used their customer support.

The initial setup was not that difficult. I have used it, and while it was a bit tricky for some time, it was manageable.

The setup was good and easy. I am still using the free trial, but I will be purchasing it.

Other organizations can use OneLogin, but they can also refer to Okta. I have not used Okta until now, but I am hearing that it is more great than OneLogin.

I am still using OneLogin, so I am still exploring the app and need some more time.

The experience has been smooth and quite positive. My review rating for OneLogin is 8.5 out of 10.

When we have multiple environments for our customers, OneLogin by One Identity helps us create policies based on device, network, and role. For example, when an engineer wants to access the Azure portal via SAML SSO, we provide access according to their role. When they need VPN access via RADIUS or LDAP, we grant access based on network requirements.

The multi-factor authentication feature has helped our company, which is an IT service provider, secure admin and privileged accounts. When our technicians access client systems remotely, we need to provide them with secure and privileged account access. It has improved our compliance by allowing us to meet client requirements for MFA on all sensitive systems, providing safe login from any location or device.

Another feature that we find interesting is the audit logs and reporting, which has helped us track who, where, and how users logged into the system.

Using OneLogin by One Identity has positively impacted our organization. We are able to comply with client compliance requirements and have managed to reduce takeover time risk. Even if a password is stolen, an attacker cannot log in without second-factor authentication, making it more secure.

Since we started using OneLogin by One Identity, we have noticed a decrease in security events, stolen passwords, and non-compliance adherence issues.

It should also include device posture checks and provide risk scoring.

We decided to switch from Okta to OneLogin by One Identity because Okta required heavy on-premises maintenance and frequent patching and had limited MFA options. We could not create adaptive policies, which was the main reason for our switch. OneLogin provides cloud-native SSO, automated provisioning, stronger MFA, and easier multi-tenant management, making it more efficient for an IT-based service company like ours.

Regarding pricing, I do not know much, but I have heard from our sales team that the licensing for OneLogin by One Identity is moderate compared to other vendors.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin by One Identity is that they should proceed with it. It is cost-efficient and provides more features for the cost compared to other vendors available in the market. It reduces our time to go live, and we have not made any changes to our existing network. OneLogin's heterogeneous support for various security vendors is excellent, and we can reduce our IT support security tickets. I would advise peers planning to purchase this solution to proceed without hesitation. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

My main use case for OneLogin by One Identity involves single sign-on, multifactor authorization, and role-based access.

For example, we have an email platform called DID Mail where we use single sign-on from OneLogin by One Identity to authenticate our users and use that same authentication on our different platforms such as virtual info and different mail platforms.

The important thing we use about OneLogin by One Identity is role-based access, where our employees sign up and can see a different interface on the same platform according to their roles.

In my opinion, the best feature OneLogin by One Identity offers is the single sign-on feature, which works seamlessly while integrating with any languages, allowing our developers to integrate with most of our platforms easily.

Security is a good aspect of OneLogin by One Identity, and our user experience is also good and mostly positive.

OneLogin by One Identity has positively impacted our organization by improving our user experience. The user experience has improved as it has saved us time, especially because the session-based login is beneficial. A user logs in for the first time and does not have to log in every single time.

OneLogin by One Identity can be improved by implementing good user interfaces or different kinds of user interfaces, which might help our users navigate much faster.

They can mainly improve their support, as they have a high response time. Decreasing it would be beneficial.

I have been using OneLogin by One Identity for about five to eight months.

OneLogin by One Identity is mostly stable.

OneLogin by One Identity's scalability is mainly automatic, so we do not have to do much. We just contact the vendor to inform them about our number of users if it increases drastically.

Our developers typically handle the integration process with the help of the support team, which is very fast and they get assistance whenever they face challenges.

Customer support is fast, but they sometimes have a high response time, such as five to ten hours, which can be problematic.

Previously, I used CyberArk Identity, and we switched because of the pricing. The main reason for switching was the pricing and the complexity of their admin user interface.

We have seen a return on investment as we have saved a lot of money, approximately ten to twelve percent, compared to our earlier use of a different identity platform such as CyberArk, which was costly.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good, but it sometimes gets expensive when the number of users increases.

Before choosing OneLogin by One Identity, we evaluated other options including Okta and different platforms, but we found that OneLogin by One Identity is overall better than Okta.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin by One Identity is that if you need better security, user interface, and a faster user experience, it is the way to go, although the support system lacks at times.

They can improve their support and reduce the price. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

We use OneLogin by One Identity to provide SAML authentication and single sign-on for all of our SaaS apps.

OneLogin by One Identity helps us onboard new users really quickly and get everything up to speed super fast. It has helped free up about half of our time through its automation features.

The directory integration and SCIM provisioning are probably the best features compared to competitors. These are the two things I have found to be most valuable.

There have been some outages over the years. The uptime has not been great recently, with some outages lasting six, seven, or eight hours. Improvement in the stability of the infrastructure would be beneficial.

I have been using OneLogin by One Identity for about three and a half years.

The stability has been an issue, with some outages lasting several hours, which impacts our work.

It's pretty scalable. We know it can handle up to maybe two hundred thousand users, and there's no limit on the number of applications we can integrate. Overall, it is very scalable.

The quality of support is okay. It's not great, but it's not worse than other companies.

In other jobs, I've used Okta and Auth0.

The initial set up was probably easy since the company was using it before I started working here.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.