BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,594 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Comprehensive Testing with Real SIM and AI Efficiency
What do you like best about the product?
I like everything about BrowserStack, especially its functionality for features like 2FA by providing a real mobile SIM. This is essential for testing apps that require SMS OTP on 4G and 5G networks. The TestManagement tool, which is now AI-driven, is another highlight for me. The generative AI capability significantly reduces our manual test case creation effort, saving us about 60%. BrowserStack's real mobile SIM allows us to register or log in to apps with two-factor or multi-factor authentication, which is extremely helpful for our offshore team that doesn't have physical SIM cards. Also, linking Jira stories to analyze and create well-documented and detailed test cases is impressive.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would be happy to see when it will start supporting the voice enable commands. Also the columns and screens to be shown to the team can be managed by Admin, so that I can control who can access what or not.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack simplifies mobile app testing with tools like appLive and TestManagement, eliminating the need for separate tools. The real mobile SIM supports 2FA testing, and generative AI in TestManagement cuts manual test case efforts by 60%, enhancing efficiency.
Seamless Device Testing with Powerful Debugging
What do you like best about the product?
I like the good debugging features with live device testing and seamless integration that BrowserStack offers. It helps me test iOS apps on real iOS devices live. The network debugging, as well as features like mocking the camera with images and recordings, are good and helpful for testing. The setup is seamless, allowing me to directly upload the app and test it.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not found
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test iOS apps on real iOS devices live. It provides good debugging with live device testing and seamless integration, including network debugging, mock camera features, and easy app uploads.
Powerful Device Cloud That Improves Test Coverage and Speed
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack’s real-device access, reliable automation execution, and excellent debugging insights make it extremely valuable for both manual and automated testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main drawbacks are pricing for smaller teams and occasional device unavailability or session queues during peak usage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of limited device and browser coverage by providing instant access to real devices and environments without the need to maintain physical hardware. This benefits me by enabling faster, more reliable manual and automated testing, reducing environment-related defects, and allowing our team to scale test execution through parallel runs while saving time and maintenance effort.
Effortless Accessibility Testing with Clear, Actionable Reports
What do you like best about the product?
The automatic scans give quick feedback on common accessibility issues like missing labels, color contrast problems, and ARIA misuse. I like that accessibility checks can be run directly on real browsers and devices instead of just static pages or local tools. The issue reports are easy to understand, they clearly explain what’s wrong and why it matters, which helps during discussions with developers.
Being able to combine accessibility checks with manual testing in BrowserStack Live is extremely useful. I can inspect screen reader behavior and keyboard navigation in the same session. It fits well into our CI flow, allowing us to catch accessibility regressions early
Being able to combine accessibility checks with manual testing in BrowserStack Live is extremely useful. I can inspect screen reader behavior and keyboard navigation in the same session. It fits well into our CI flow, allowing us to catch accessibility regressions early
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Automated scans don’t catch everything, some issues still require careful manual validation.
2. Reports can get repetitive if the same issue appears across multiple pages.
3. Custom components sometimes need manual interpretation because the tool flags them generically.
4. Deeper guidance on fixing complex ARIA issues would make the reports even better.
2. Reports can get repetitive if the same issue appears across multiple pages.
3. Custom components sometimes need manual interpretation because the tool flags them generically.
4. Deeper guidance on fixing complex ARIA issues would make the reports even better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Catches common WCAG violations early in development, not just during final audits. Reduces manual effort by automating baseline accessibility checks across multiple browsers. Helps QA and developers share a common understanding of accessibility issues using clear reports. Prevents regressions by integrating accessibility tests into CI pipelines. Saves time during release cycles by reducing last-minute accessibility fixes.
Effortless to Use and Incredibly Helpful
What do you like best about the product?
it helps to ease my work of testing and i can explore different different devices and understand there working it is easy to use and implement
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing is there to dislike.It is so helpful
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
it help us to test on different different devices if they are not physically available to us and also it not possible to have each and every version of devices with us so the browserstack made that possible we can test and also explore so many version of devices
Essential Platform for Reliable Cross-Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is surprising platform for cross-browser and cross-device testing. It offers real devices and browsers, ensuring accurate results that match real-world conditions. The interface is intuitive, integrations with frameworks like Selenium and Appium are seamless, and the customer support is responsive and knowledgeable. It has significantly reduced our testing time while improving coverage and quality. Highly recommended for project seeking for reliable, scalable testing solutions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Connectivity problems: Occasional disconnections during live testing.
Performance issues: Sessions can lag, freeze, or load slowly, especially on iOS and automation tests.
High pricing: Expensive plans with limited flexibility; no pay-as-you-go options.
Connectivity problems: Occasional disconnections during live testing.
Performance issues: Sessions can lag, freeze, or load slowly, especially on iOS and automation tests.
High pricing: Expensive plans with limited flexibility; no pay-as-you-go options.
Connectivity problems: Occasional disconnections during live testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It provides a robust platform for cross-browser and cross-device testing, making it easy to ensure compatibility across environments. The integration with test management tools streamlines workflows, allowing teams to organize, execute, and track tests efficiently. Additionally, the documentation is comprehensive and well-structured, which helps in quick onboarding and troubleshooting. Overall, BrowserStack enhances productivity and confidence in delivering quality software.
Effortless Automation, Superb Test Management
What do you like best about the product?
I like the simplicity of BrowserStack, especially how easy it is to set up Automate with basic configurations without having to configure a bunch of stuff. The test management feature has been developing well with the features we needed over a short time. I find the AI recommendation for generating test steps quite useful, as it reduces the time to manually compose test steps. Even though the AI recommendations are not perfect every time, they allow us to easily adjust them to our desired steps, saving effort. I also appreciate the support from the BrowserStack team, which made our initial setup smooth and without big obstacles.
What do you dislike about the product?
I'm not a big fan of UI changes. There was a time when the Automate UI was revamped, which made my life a bit hard as the simple test replays were hidden in the UI.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing app compatibility on various devices, simplifying test management, and automation setup with ease. The AI recommendations help reduce time for documenting test steps, making our testing process more efficient.
Streamlined Testing with Extensive Device Options
What do you like best about the product?
I think the modularity and the ability to choose from a unique number of devices and operating systems is really helpful. BrowserStack allows me to change the IP and the region to see how the app performs from different locations. It's been great to work with from the beginning, performing really well for us. The initial setup was smooth and didn't require many dependencies or integrations, which was great for someone like me who comes from a non-tech background. I could just upload the app version and test it across devices easily. The onboarding journey was indeed smooth.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think a lot of times, the platform gets blocked by WAF rules. Again, this is really subjective to the company that is using it, but a bunch of times the app is not able to run on the particular device on BrowserStack because of either geolocation configuration, which is outside the scope of using the app. Or it can be due to certain WAF rules. If someone is just using BrowserStack, it's not enough to see what is going wrong. Perhaps some visibility towards why the app cannot work would be useful.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me ensure my app doesn't break across devices by tracking and seeing performance across multiple devices and operating systems.
Extensive Device Selection Enhances UI Testing
What do you like best about the product?
browserstack has large number of devices which helps in improving the site UI.
What do you dislike about the product?
Face some intermittent issue related to devtool not working, sometime iphone does not load the website properly or unauthorize access issue
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
currently, it helps in testing on the different devices, including iphone, android and desktop. it helps in atuomation testing as well.
Robust Cross browser testing and Consistent Platform with access to real world devices
What do you like best about the product?
The UI and UX of browser stack is super clean. It has a wide range of real devices and browsers which are ready to use in one click. The customer support is top notch. The dashboard is user friendly and doesn't require any training. It offers cross browser automation and live testing which is a must.. Also browserstack offers great debugging capabilities including screenshots and logs hence offering a huge add on when reporting UI bugs.
What do you dislike about the product?
I deal with frequent session terminate issues specially when switching tabs even for a short period if time. It doesn't offer concurrent live sessions could be restriction with lower subscription account. Sometimes observes lagging issues when switching between real devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It completely removed the hassle of managing multiple physical devices. Also it helps me find browser/OS specific issues early reducing production bugs and more reliable releases. Browser stack offers a range of old and new real devices which helps me in duplicating user/mobile specific issues.
showing 41 - 50