BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,289 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
𝐋𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐔𝐩 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross browser and real device testing. It saves a lot of setup time and gives access to a wide range of real devices and browsers instantly. The ability to test in real user conditions is a huge plus, especially when working on responsiveness and bug tracking. It also integrates well with our automation workflow, making both manual and automated testing more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack is the occasional wait time to access certain real devices, especially those I’ve recently used. It can slow down testing when devices are in high demand. Also, there can be minor lags or session timeouts during live testing, which affect the overall workflow. While the platform is powerful, sometimes navigating between features or configurations isn’t as smooth as it could be.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the major challenge of testing across different browsers, devices, and operating systems without needing to maintain an in house device lab. It gives me instant access to real devices and browsers, which is crucial for mobile and web automation. This saves a lot of time, improves test coverage, and helps identify bugs early in real-world environments. It’s especially useful for ensuring that our applications work consistently for all users, regardless of the platform they’re on.
BrowserStack - best service for responsive and device testing
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack provides the extensive set of devices to test. There customer support is very good.
What do you dislike about the product?
Switching the device in between the testing is not there.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack provides the way to test within different set of devices and browsers.
All in one tool for QA work : Highly Recommend
What do you like best about the product?
The best thing I like about this tool is:
1) Easy to use
2) Test with many devices with all OS
3) Smoothly access all devices
4) Good Support from their team.
1) Easy to use
2) Test with many devices with all OS
3) Smoothly access all devices
4) Good Support from their team.
What do you dislike about the product?
No dislike for this tool as I like all features.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a developer, everyday I have to test many features so i don't have more devices so using this tool we can test our products and their all features in wide range of devices with all OS.
Great tool for testing the Android App
What do you like best about the product?
I like all these
1) Wide Range of mobile and desktop devices
2) Testing AI Script writing tool
3) Smooth loading
4) Support Team
1) Wide Range of mobile and desktop devices
2) Testing AI Script writing tool
3) Smooth loading
4) Support Team
What do you dislike about the product?
There is not dislike for this tool. All working good and smoothly
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Using this tool we have solve our Android app UI/UX issue because now we can test our application in many mobile devices through this tool and it help a lot to fix all issues. Also, save our time and boost our work efficiency. Great tool as per my own experience.
It has been easy to use and loaded with features
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ease of access and the user friendly interface.
What do you dislike about the product?
I do not like that I cant test more than one device at a time and the occasional 'Browserstack-ism' that I have to check with team mate to ensure it isnt an error in OUR functionality.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the issue of cross testing on multiple devices. We need this to provide a good baseline user experience.
A complete QA platform
What do you like best about the product?
There are so many angles now like visual, website scanning apart from the usual cross browser and automated testing services provided
What do you dislike about the product?
It sometimes becomes confusing as to which product to subscribe to :)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is mostly great to test our stuff across a myriad of OS/Browser combinations and it benefits as otherwise so many of them are hard to find anywhere physically
Browserstack is huge plus tool for QA
What do you like best about the product?
cross browser testing and live simulation, running automation tool has improved the QA process, and made the testing more easier for QAs.
What do you dislike about the product?
The authentication of certain client havings additional login such as using cloudflare which is linked to your local machine, but cannot the full automation unless it is ran locally. This limits from testing to the full extent and viewing certain element in percy.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing of cross browser, live simulation, and including accessbility testing
Good tool for cross browser testing
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack has been helpful for cross-browser testing. It allows us to test our app on different browsers and mobile devices, which is crucial for ensuring compatibility. The interface is simple to use, and setting up tests is quick. It integrates well with our existing CI/CD setup.
One feature I really appreciate is the ability to test on real devices, which helps catch issues that might not appear in a simulated environment.
Overall, it’s a great tool that has improved our testing process
One feature I really appreciate is the ability to test on real devices, which helps catch issues that might not appear in a simulated environment.
Overall, it’s a great tool that has improved our testing process
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I would like to see improved is the performance when testing via VPN. It tends to slow down the device, which can affect the overall test cycle time. Other than that, it’s been a reliable tool
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of cross-browser and cross-device testing, allowing us to ensure our application works properly for all users, regardless of the browser or device they're using. It benefits us by providing a seamless way to run tests on real devices and different OS versions without needing to set up and maintain multiple physical devices
Browserstack can address your all QA needs
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack is most modern QA solution platform as well as device farm with unbelievable device and browser range. It is very easy to use and support teams always help to all integrations. BS can integrate with various software like Jira, GitHub and very easy to do CI/CD integrations.
What do you dislike about the product?
When we using automation plans, we can't access live features on it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
When we do the web automation, our main problem is capturing the all-network logs, console logs and screen recording for each testcases. Browserstack address that issue perfectly. They provide marvelous test result dashboard with all screen recordings with all logs.
If you need it, you need it
What do you like best about the product?
Quick access to many different systems, you can't have that many devices. If you want to debug display errors on exotic devices, there's nothing better. The different versions also allow testing of "older devices."
What do you dislike about the product?
Many of the advanced features do not work reliably. Sometimes it works, then it's broken again.
The clipboard only works very unreliably for me. Alternatives should be offered here. If stable integration is not possible, I would be satisfied with a text input where I can "paste."
The camera feed is not reliably supported. In Firefox, I currently don't get a camera, the VR mode of Chrome where you can walk through an apartment and upload pictures currently crashes in S32 (Chrome crashes every time).
Local testing is too limited. The tunnel to localhost is useless for the integration of third-party services, as they only run under localhost (in dev mode) or under the production URL. Scandit, for example, blocks usage if it does not happen from localhost, so the integration cannot be tested. Access via bs-local.com is not possible.
The clipboard only works very unreliably for me. Alternatives should be offered here. If stable integration is not possible, I would be satisfied with a text input where I can "paste."
The camera feed is not reliably supported. In Firefox, I currently don't get a camera, the VR mode of Chrome where you can walk through an apartment and upload pictures currently crashes in S32 (Chrome crashes every time).
Local testing is too limited. The tunnel to localhost is useless for the integration of third-party services, as they only run under localhost (in dev mode) or under the production URL. Scandit, for example, blocks usage if it does not happen from localhost, so the integration cannot be tested. Access via bs-local.com is not possible.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Validation of mobile website. With BrowserStack, we check if everything is rendered as desired. If problems occur, it assists in debugging.
showing 11 - 20