BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,627 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
App Live is best for Mobile App
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack has a lot of features for automation and manual testing. I like and mostly use it app live feature for manual testing on different devices. as currently I own iOS device but to test our android app it is very challenging for me to borrow test device from IT dept as they are always low on inventory. This is when Browserstack App Live feature comes into the picture. I can now test on various devices within a single dashboard. Also, it has a great feature where we can see the logs of our app.
We can also report the bugs directly through the Browserstack's dashboard.
We can also report the bugs directly through the Browserstack's dashboard.
What do you dislike about the product?
While launching any device it takes a lot of time. Even some times it crashes and lanches the device after a very long time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solving our problem of borrowing different devices for more coverege of devices for testing. But now with its App Live feature we can test on serveral devices from one dasboard.
It is a stable and effective solution with a competitive cost.
What do you like best about the product?
How we can organize and visualize test results. The interface for network logs is awesome.
What do you dislike about the product?
Honestly I find it hard to use the manual testing solution. We also were having issues with appium + iOS stability.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mobile functional regression tests. Sometimes we are using for performance review (instrumenting transitions of our application) and in rare occasions we can use to investigate some device specific bugs.
Browser stack will be king in testing
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack provider so many devices & browsers options & have good support team in case of any issue.
What do you dislike about the product?
sometimes its very slow to load , mostly safari browsers
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
it's solving browser & cross device funtioanlity & design preview problem, otherwise I need to purchase all type of devices like andorid , iphone, mac & all
Strong tool
What do you like best about the product?
Cross browser platform testing, easy automation and ready automation template frameworks. Ability to test in different location. Responsive customer support.
What do you dislike about the product?
Everything is good, I just wanna say thank you!
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps ensure my work is top-notch by letting me test across different platforms and automate processes, saving me time and hassle.
Cracked UI Testing
What do you like best about the product?
We can identify issues for images, colors and many more visuals.
Sometimes our image is not loading completly on some devices and with our existing Automation suite we make it pass as It says that it has image element. But now if our image is not loading on some particular device or there is color different Browserstack's percy can detect this and show us the report.
We have scheduled a piepline with percy and it shows us report after every deployment which make our product more reliable.
Sometimes our image is not loading completly on some devices and with our existing Automation suite we make it pass as It says that it has image element. But now if our image is not loading on some particular device or there is color different Browserstack's percy can detect this and show us the report.
We have scheduled a piepline with percy and it shows us report after every deployment which make our product more reliable.
What do you dislike about the product?
Basically, percy is finding the CSS issues which we can also write from scratch. But for mobile apps writing script to catch CSS issues is a tough task and browserstack should extent Percy to Mobile Apps also
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Earlier it was a tough task for us to identify the UI bugs where image is not loading, color is incorrect. Our UI automation framework wasn't effective as it wasnt able to eleminate the visuals issues. Before Percy we use to manually identified all the visual bugs time to time with eavery release but now this also helps us to reduce our workforce. Now with the help of Percy we are confident with our product.
I'm now a Automation Expert
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack's low code automation has a great feature which enables me to write automation script without much knowledge of test framework.
I can use that automation script on various browsers to run and test my web apps.
It gives us a detailed report and also I have created a pipeline and integrated my script which runs daily and we get issues which are on production.
I can use that automation script on various browsers to run and test my web apps.
It gives us a detailed report and also I have created a pipeline and integrated my script which runs daily and we get issues which are on production.
What do you dislike about the product?
Browserstack's other features are great but its low code automation is limited to only web app. It doesn't support Android and iOS mobile apps.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Although, there is free alternative for browserstack's low code automation in browsers to which write scripts. But that doesn't support giving detailed report and test suite. Here we are writing scripts and setting up a proper test automation suite. As a Project Manager, I dont write automation script but with the help of low code automation I am writing my own scripts in the initial development phase as we know that on inital phase of development there is lot of change in UI. And for this use Low Code Automation is the perfect solution.
Transparent Pricing and Good Value
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack for us was one of many options to run our automated e2e tests. They by far are the most transparent in thier pricing and most reasonable in terms of the value for dollar spent (Compare to circle, ADF, saucelabs, etc) It also runs the tests in our last comparison in half the time they take to run on circle. I also like that it's an easy ramp for product managers to do manual testing on a lot of different devices visually instead of taking QA resources to hand hold or train on emulators. In most automation frameworks using browserstack is plug and play.
What do you dislike about the product?
We aren't using enough of thier capabilities to really have complaints, perhaps longer result storage or an easy way to support long term data storage of test runs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We run our automated e2e tests daily on physical devices. This is helping us prepare for CI/CD in the future, and in the short term we can investigate failures before the final release cut.
Principal software engineering using BrowserStack as main source for testing automation solution
What do you like best about the product?
1. Automate tools - In the project we are working on, we need to have reliable and easy to use tools to help with the automation developing process. We find the Automate tools for real mobile device from BrowserStack quite helpful not only for dev but also for debugging.
2. Availability of the real devices from BrowserStack cloud - in our automation developing, we don't need to worry about if devices are available or ready for use which is super helpful and take lots of concerns and initial setting up work load off the engineers so we can focus on the business and what really matters to the purpose.
3. Tech documentations - at the beginning of the integration, the documentation quality and accuracy would impact the effeicency a lot. We found the documentations are helpful overall.
4. Having specific account manager we can reach out - when we have issues, by having one person we know we always can reach out and get response is critical. Sometimes we get frustrated by told to reach out to Customer Support email or line which rarely get response in time. Or the response usually isn't that helpful.
2. Availability of the real devices from BrowserStack cloud - in our automation developing, we don't need to worry about if devices are available or ready for use which is super helpful and take lots of concerns and initial setting up work load off the engineers so we can focus on the business and what really matters to the purpose.
3. Tech documentations - at the beginning of the integration, the documentation quality and accuracy would impact the effeicency a lot. We found the documentations are helpful overall.
4. Having specific account manager we can reach out - when we have issues, by having one person we know we always can reach out and get response is critical. Sometimes we get frustrated by told to reach out to Customer Support email or line which rarely get response in time. Or the response usually isn't that helpful.
What do you dislike about the product?
Here are a few pain points based on the current project and experience:
1. In our mobile automation, we see performance difference between iOS and Android phones. In general, Android phones are much faster in terms of refreshing pages with push notificaiton, but it usually has a long delay on the iPhones. We have to write certain code specifially to handle the performance issues to run the tests on iPhones - which in my opinion should never be the case.
2. iPhones from BrowserStack doesn't support Push testing unless with an enterprise licence. I understand this is based off the limitations of Apple, etc. But the reality is our team needs to look for alternative solutions other than BrowserStack to achieve this goal. We really wish to continue using BrowserStack as device solution and even expand to broader areas.
1. In our mobile automation, we see performance difference between iOS and Android phones. In general, Android phones are much faster in terms of refreshing pages with push notificaiton, but it usually has a long delay on the iPhones. We have to write certain code specifially to handle the performance issues to run the tests on iPhones - which in my opinion should never be the case.
2. iPhones from BrowserStack doesn't support Push testing unless with an enterprise licence. I understand this is based off the limitations of Apple, etc. But the reality is our team needs to look for alternative solutions other than BrowserStack to achieve this goal. We really wish to continue using BrowserStack as device solution and even expand to broader areas.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Real device availability and testability
Comprehensive product for enhancing quality
What do you like best about the product?
I like the comprehensive coverage the tool provides on cross browser, test management tools, accessibility
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't have anything I don't like about BrowserStack
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Corss Broswer and platform testing
Browser Stack Review
What do you like best about the product?
Able to use on desktop and ease of use on desktop
What do you dislike about the product?
The tool slow response time and timeout.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack enables my team to simulate mobile testing on desktop which made it easier to see than mobile device
showing 1,101 - 1,110