MongoDB does well in being able to access our network devices and keep logs and reporting—that's about it.

I would recommend MongoDB as part of a template if anyone is considering free and open-source templating services such as LibreNMS, but as a standalone, I couldn't advise.

MongoDB has definitely helped us improve our network monitoring and reporting dashboard, so I would say it has impacted our operations positively overall.

I'm not sure about the documentation or the knowledge bases available for MongoDB because I don't interact with it at that level, but I would say it's minimal and could be improved.

I am not experienced with MongoDB enough to know any pain points or areas they could improve.

Nothing else comes to mind at this time that could be improved.

We deployed MongoDB about five years ago and it has been in operation since then.

I was not a part of the initial setup or deployment of MongoDB.

One person was involved with the setup team, and it took just a few days to deploy it.

Overall, on a scale of one to ten, I would rate MongoDB an eight; it's mostly because we're still running a monolithic environment on old hardware, so there are some limitations with read-write access.

At this time, I'm only looking into Cisco or Linux or other solutions out of curiosity about possibly switching to it, but currently all that we use are LibreNMS and Splynx.

From what I know, I would say the initial setup of MongoDB was pretty straightforward.

On LibreNMS, they have a template for setting up the environment that includes all the services, so MongoDB is just part of that template, meaning they weren't really too hands-on with setting up MongoDB itself.

One person was involved with the setup team, and their job title was Network Operations Engineer.

I'm familiar with open-source databases such as MongoDB, and I don't think it's Grafana, but it's similar to Grafana, though I'm trying to think of what it's called.

I'm not entirely sure about the main differences between MongoDB and other open-source databases that I've used.

We haven't really delved too much into looking at comparisons for databases.

MongoDB is not currently supporting our AI-driven projects nor do we use it along with AI at all.

I don't know how MongoDB's document-oriented model has benefited our management processes; that's beyond my expertise.

I don't have experience with QRadar or Auvik or similar products.

I'm familiar with some Linux tools, just things such as smokeping, which we use implemented in our LibreNMS environment.

I'm only an operator, so I don't actually spend a lot of time developing MongoDB, thus I'm not sure what the best features are.

I would rate MongoDB an eight out of ten.

Neutral

I am basically a developer and also a freelancer. I take up a lot of freelance projects for which I use MongoDB. I use it for the database system on my website.

The tool provides some free packages for freshers, which is very good because a lot of beginners or students don't want to spend too much money on it. The tool is also user-friendly. I don't make any connections a lot of the time if I use MongoDB in my project.

I previously encountered some issues with the tool, which included downtime issues. Sometimes, the tool goes down temporarily. There are some stability issues in the product.

There are some problems with the tool's website, and it can get laggy, but otherwise, it is pretty good.

I have been using MongoDB for more than a year. I am just a user of the tool.

The tool works most of the time, but it may go down at times. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

The tool's scalability is pretty good. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

MongoDB is pretty popular, and we have a lot of documents and support available for it. The community is pretty big for it. I never faced any problems.

I have a little experience with SQL, but. I have major experience with MongoDB because it is well compared to other tools.

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

The product's deployment phase can be done quickly. In a few minutes, we can create a database, get the APIs, and use it without any issues.

The pricing is normal. Price-wise, the product is not too much expensive.

Though the replication features in the product are pretty good, I don't use them a lot.

I definitely recommend the tool to other people. A lot of startups can use it, and some people can already use it. If some students want to do some project, they can use the tool as its pricing is reasonable. The support and stability of the tool are also okay.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

I use MongoDB mainly on the back end. We use it in my company for the database, and I also use it on my side projects.

MongoDB is a NoSQL tool that gives us much freedom to manipulate how the data works.

MongoDB should support TypeScript.

I have been using MongoDB for about two years.

I haven't had any issues with the solution's stability. However, our company faced an issue where the tool was down for two hours.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

MongoDB is a very scalable solution. About 10,000 users are using the solution in our organization.

I would recommend the solution to other users because it's scalable and easy to learn. The solution's documentation can be rigid and hard to understand initially. Users should use an ORM or ODM. They should use Prisma or Mongoose as the starting point for using MongoDB. MongoDB is easier to manipulate. The easier the onboarding, the harder the maintenance.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

MongoDB is a data storage platform. All our application databases are stored in JSON format, and we also use MongoDB replication.

MongoDB is pretty lightweight and fast on the web because we're using non-structured data. One of the reasons we chose MongoDB is that we don't have to worry about the schema. It is also available in the cloud, and we are going to move to Atlas Cloud for MongoDB. MongoDB has many good replication features and good performance.

Some of the solution's transaction capabilities can be improved. Not much support is available on the transaction side. The size of the document that we can share is also limited. MongoDB also has sharding capabilities, but they are a bit complex. There is some issue with the replication of MongoDB across clusters. We're not able to replicate MongoDB.

I have been using MongoDB for almost five years.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for stability.

The solution is more suited for small to medium-sized businesses.

I rate the solution’s scalability a seven out of ten.

MongoDB and PostgreSQL are very similar solutions.

The solution’s initial setup is very simple.

We are currently using the on-premises version of MongoDB, but we are moving to the cloud. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate MongoDB an eight out of ten.

We primarily use MongoDB as a database to handle large volumes of data. It's useful when we need to manage millions of records quickly.

The cloud solution offered by MongoDB, known as Atlas, has been invaluable to us. It provides a good, user-friendly interface. The ease of use and scalability make it stand out compared to relational databases.

Improvements could be made in query optimization, particularly when performing lookups or joining tables. Input functions to restrict the amount of data passed in pipelines would be beneficial for this purpose. Additionally, enhancing the documentation to make it more beginner-friendly is crucial. As someone with seven years of experience with MongoDB, I find the ecosystem intuitive, but newcomers often need help with the documentation. 

We have been using MongoDB for seven years now, and we are currently using the latest version.

The platform has good stability.

We contacted the MongoDB team for assistance whenever we encountered issues, particularly when optimizing queries that took too long. They helped us understand the root cause of the problem and provided us with discounts on certain occasions. For instance, when we accidentally used a larger instance, which resulted in higher costs, they understood the situation and offered us a discount to mitigate the expense.

Positive

We chose MongoDB over other solutions because it can handle large volumes of data and is flexible in data manipulation.

The initial setup process is easy.

The product is affordable, but I don't have direct comparisons with other products as I haven't been involved in the billing process.

The NoSQL structure, particularly the document-based data management, has made data management easier for me. MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

MongoDB's document-oriented model improves development speed by providing each document with its built-in key or ID, similar to a primary key in relational databases. This inherent ID facilitates faster execution of operations, such as searching for specific documents. Additionally, it allows for creating additional indexes, further enhancing performance. The familiarity of JSON-like structure makes it easy for developers, both front-end and back-end, to work with, leading to quicker development and visualization of data.

I advise others to understand the fundamentals of databases and how they store data. They should start with online videos to grasp the ecosystem, focusing on concepts like data storage. The document-oriented structure with binary objects is crucial for individuals with a programming background.

Several limitations related to querying certain documents can be challenging. They express concerns about the lookup process, where we sometimes need to fetch a large amount of data simultaneously. Additionally, there are limitations regarding the size of documents, which may require restructuring or storing data.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for database verification purposes. Typically, we integrate other analytics tools with the solution, like databases and other tools.

The Dynamic Application is a valuable feature.

The analytics needs improvement.

I have been using MongoDB for a couple of years. 

Hundreds of users use the solution at present. 

The initial setup is straightforward.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

I use MongoDB in our company since our overall data is stored on it. My company uses the tool as a back-end database.

The most valuable features of the solution are that it appeases our company's needs and is quick.

The dashboard is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required. The price of the product may be a concern for the customers who use it, so improvements may be required in the pricing model.

I have been using MongoDB for more than ten years. I use the solution's latest version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

It is always important to ensure that users use the latest version of MongoDB if they want to use the scalability features of the product.

There are more than 1,000 users of the solution.

My company plans to expand the number of users of the product.

MongoDB's technical support team is responsive and helpful.

I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

The product's initial setup phase was quite easy, but for some use cases, it was a bit difficult.

The solution is deployed on the private cloud services offered by AWS.

The solution can be deployed in a couple of hours. The product's initial deployment phase can be taken care of in an hour, and if any further deployments are required after that, it takes less than an hour.

Six to seven engineers are required to take care of the deployment and maintenance phases of the solution.

The integration capabilities of MongoDB are fine for the solutions that we use in our company.

The tool's vendor takes care of the product's maintenance.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.