The product is used for the core business processes like accounts payable, accounts receivable, and order management.

Celonis Studio was introduced recently. Earlier, Celonis was case-centric. It worked on a case level. Now, it groups object-centric things. Action Flows are good. Most of the features in Studio are valuable to us. The solution has many features.

With every upgrade, the product is completely changed. When we work on technological tools, improvements will be made. However, the product should be similar to its previous version even after upgrades. With Celonis, the product and its features are completely changed after upgrades. The new features launched are unrelated to the previous version's features. A person experienced with last year's version cannot use the features introduced in the latest version.

I have been working with the solution for almost four to five years. I am working with the latest version of the solution.

The tool’s stability is good. There are no issues. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the scalability of the tool an eight out of ten. Nearly 100 people in my organization are using the product. My clients are enterprise businesses.

Earlier, the technical support was the worst. Now, it has improved.

I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. The solution is deployed on the cloud mostly. The product can be deployed within eight to ten weeks if the process is less complex. A complex process with more use cases would take more time.

To deploy the solution, we need to understand the customer’s database environment and make a real-time connection. It is the most challenging part of the process. Customers don't allow us to connect to their databases. We must explain to them how we maintain their privacy and store their data. Once the connection is made, we just follow the normal procedures.

The solution’s pricing is high when compared to other process mining tools. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

People looking to use the solution should understand the basics and how Celonis works at the architecture level. Many users get trained and come to the job directly without understanding how the architecture works. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our main use cases for Celonis cover finance use cases and analyzing comparable performance.

Celonis provides business process analysis and technical consulting for deployment.

The process mapping is most valuable to us. It shows the sections of the different timestamps and the statistical information on the timestamps' waiting time. So that feature helps us give feedback to businesses and identify the final root cause.

They could provide artificial intelligence where, based on data they collect from reference cases, they could give us suggestions. For example, we see a long delay between steps, and based on the context, they could provide more suggestions on where the problem could be, and that would provide a very different value proposition for the solution. Likewise, if you can't define something as account receivable or account payable, Celonis could ask a lot of questions to fix the context to provide the right recommendation. It would be relatively easy.

It has been three years since we started using Celonis, and we are using the SaaS version.

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten because we have not seen performance issues so far.

I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten, it is very scalable. We have 200 end users using Celonis globally. Developers have multiple use cases.

Their consultants are quite knowledgeable.

We have used UiPath, they also have a process analysis tool. We did a POC and saw that it's lighter and easier to adapt, but the functionality was limited. That's why we don't use it anymore.

As a German software, Celonis' initial setup is difficult, so I rate the initial setup a five out of ten. Celonis has a learning curve. It's not very easy-to-handle software. It takes one month to negotiate and deploy the solution.

When deploying the solution, not counting the data of the consulting engagement, we have the environment discussion and the setup of the AWS environment their consultants put into the system. Then we do the rough testing, run some simple cases through the system, verify, and then go ahead. After that, we announce we can provide services to external customers. Overall, those are the general steps standard for any IT application. One or two people are enough for deployment. The solution is not a big one.

I rate Celonis' pricing a ten out of ten because it is expensive.

Celonis is now becoming the corporate standard solution. That's why we have been talking to the team at the global COE to get support for any future requirements. There's no extended collaboration with external companies anymore.

Celonis has identified the product's limitation, which is that it tells me where the problem is, but it cannot fix the problem. The tool only gives the proposal to fix it. Celonis is aware of the problem and provides transparency, and they are looking for solutions and options for businesses, but that is not in its scope. For example, when you go to a hospital and use an X-ray machine to understand what's happening, you won't expect the machine to fix your problem. You still have to get a doctor to do the operation and fix the problem. Celonis uses some of its features to solve problems, but not so successfully in all areas. Businesses are dynamic, and we are aware of our problems, and more transparency is great, but fixing that problem is much more valuable to us.

We are not considering increasing the usage at this stage because the business has just completed the first wave of deployment. Also, the license is not cheap.

Two things to keep in mind before choosing Celonis: do not think the solution can be easily adopted just because it is valuable for others. The system relies highly on the availability of data. Your company or business environment should provide the data that can fit the solution, especially since the timestamps available show the value. The second thing is that though process mining is valuable, double-check with businesses as to what they do to follow the transparency to convert the investment into business value. I rate Celonis an eight out of ten.

I use the product for technical support.

The main feature of the product is process mining. We can use it to discover processes and mitigate the mistakes in the process. It also helps in optimizing the processes.

First-time users would need help from the support team to implement the solution. The support costs are very high. We must pay a very high price if we need to involve the support team.

I have one year of experience implementing the solution in the mining industry.

We get support from the web pages dedicated to support. If we face any specific server situation we don't have any experience with, we can resolve it with the technical support team’s help.

We use other enterprise solutions like Make. We use Make to integrate other solutions like Microsoft Excel and SAP.

The initial setup is not complex. We need to get trained and have some expertise in using the tools and the platform.

We implement the solution to gather information about the service providers. We do not need to maintain the product after that.

The tool has different pricing plans. We use a cloud solution focused on enterprise businesses new to process mining and Celonis. If we want to scale it up in the company or another process and another business unit, the cost will be high.

Once we try to scale it up, the product becomes expensive. The pricing is not an issue in a medium and large company because it's very low. It will cost $15,000 a year when we start using the solution. However, if we want to scale these solutions, the pricing can go up to $200,000 and more.

We do only one project or one process. I do not have experience with the tool’s scalability. We use it to mitigate the mistakes in this process. It is a very good product. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

The main use cases for Celonis are twofold. Firstly, it involves the end-to-end implementation of Celonis for various business processes so that clients can monitor their business processes. Secondly, there's a secondary use case related to internal audits. Here, we analyze one to two years of data to identify process inefficiencies and other pain points.

In one of our client’s normal implementation projects, we identified different pain points using Celonis. Celonis identified a lot of rework, and we implemented some additional improvements, like RPA. This way, the rework can be minimized, reducing human involvement. This improvement was possible because of Celonis.

The product helps clients visualize potential savings by minimizing human errors and reducing manual work. These aspects can be effectively identified and implemented using Celonis. It is the goal for all the Celonis projects.

The purchase and ticketing management processes could be improved. The solution must be more user-friendly. Another room for improvement is the interface. A few different coding languages, such as Python, SQL, and YAML, are being used right now. To use the product completely, we have to know all these languages. It is a little difficult for beginners to learn so many new things together. If there are one or two languages or drag-and-drop features, it will be easier for new users.

Celonis provides many updates every month or every quarter. It is difficult for the implementation partners to stay updated with the features they are providing. The product is already adding many new features every quarter.

I have been using the solution for almost four years now. I currently use the latest version.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability an eight out of ten because it is already a market leader. I have worked with different clients from different regions of the world. Almost all the clients prefer Celonis for process mining. Many clients are also moving from traditional reporting tools like Power BI or Tableau to Celonis.

I rate the ease of setup a seven out of ten. It is moderately easy. The solution is deployed on the cloud.

A standard deployment process takes around six to eight weeks. Initially, we set up the connection with the client's source system and Celonis. Then, we extract the data, transform it, and create the dashboard and reports as required. Finally, we analyze the visualization to identify the pain points.

I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten. The solution is quite expensive. It has some customized plans for different partners. Sometimes Celonis sells the licenses directly to the client, and we only implement it. So the licensing cost depends on the requirement, but it is costly.

I mostly work on cross-industry projects with multiple vendors from different industries and domains. The projects mainly revolve around processes like purchase-to-pay, order-to-cash, accounts payable, accounts receivable, ticketing, and integration management. There are a few KPIs that we track, and it depends on the process. For example, in the purchase-to-pay process, we have KPIs like reworks, automation, and segregation of duties. Based on these KPIs, we try to implement improvements and optimize the process flow wherever we see room for improvement.

I will recommend the solution to others because it will open up completely new potentials in their existing business process. They can know how their existing business processes can be optimized and improved. We can discover so many new things using Celonis, which is impossible with any other traditional reporting tool in the industry. The tool has many different capabilities, like automation. It is a complete tool. The solution has a few issues.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to collect the logs from a particular process, inject them into the tool, and analyze them to create a flow diagram. It helps visualize the entire process flow.

The solution works excellently for large-scale implementations of the applications. It performs well for connecting multiple processes.

We encounter challenges while analyzing logs. They should leverage the solution's machine learning algorithms for better log analysis.

I have been using the solution for two years.

It is a highly stable solution. I rate its stability an eight.

We can use the solution in multiple ways in terms of processes. I rate its scalability a seven.

The solution's community and technical support team are good. Although, the response time depends on the subscription.

The solution's initial setup has medium complexity. We need to check whether the services are running in a particular order. I rate the process a seven. It takes a few hours to complete.

The solution is expensive. I rate its pricing a six.

We have evaluated a few solutions for their licensing models.

I advise others to opt for the solution if they want a process mining product. I rate it a six out of ten.