User Frindly Linux Distro for Start using linux
What do you like best about the product?
The user-friendly UI makes it easy to use for first-time users. And if you install with the full software package, you can use it without any issues. And if someone can't buy a license, it's best to use this.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some software is hard to install that make the user expariance bit hard.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Security is really good.
easy to use the GUI
No license and pro version available for personal users
Simple to use
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Ubuntu is easy to use. I have it on multiple servers and can normally get things up and running in less than an hour.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't have any complaints about Ubuntu. At least most of the problems I've encountered are user caused and not faults of the operating system
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Ubuntu to host web applications and have some home lab services running off of it.
Good compatibility and improvement needed in migration process
What is our primary use case?
I basically work only in Linux because I'm a Linux system administrator, so I preferably only work in Linux systems.
I'm basically a system admin in the Linux domain, and I work in EC2 instances only. My work revolves around Drupal websites, as I work in an organization that primarily focuses on Drupal websites. To run those Drupal websites, we use EC2 instances as our server, so that is the main expertise I have.
I am not exactly in development because I'm in operations, but that can come into the role itself because I'm involved in operations, not the development team itself.
What is most valuable?
I am currently using Ubuntu Linux internally in my company, and for customers too.
For long-term support, it has been good because in most enterprise environments, people still use Ubuntu Linux sixteen, which is quite obsolete now. Other enterprise versions do not support obsolete systems, so supportability is good in terms of Ubuntu Linux. For sustainability, it's quite a significant point of view for every organization. For us, Ubuntu Linux is the preferable way.
The documentation for Ubuntu Linux is quite extensive; you'll gain the information that we intend to, but you need to have the ability to navigate through the documents. That's very good knowledge that they provide, and that's a solid point from me.
Most people prefer Ubuntu Linux. If they want any specific tooling, such as SAP applications, people use SUSE or Red Hat for specific hybrid infrastructures related to security. If people want reliability and flexibility to run anything, they use Ubuntu Linux. Compatibility with hardware is very good with Ubuntu Linux; I have seen very few issues regarding compatibility.
The first advantage is that it's price-efficient as far as the enterprise version is concerned. There's not a very big difference, but if you are running ten to twenty thousand fleets, those few dollars could mean a lot for some organizations. The second advantage is compatibility with any hardware, and the third is reliable OS updates and support.
Any Linux is scalable in terms of capacity, and on a day-to-day basis, we use scalability options with the help of Kubernetes clusters. It's very convenient to scale it up to any form needed because Ubuntu Linux itself is a lightweight OS.
What needs improvement?
For long-term support, it has been good because in most enterprise environments, people still use Ubuntu Linux sixteen, which is quite obsolete now. Other enterprise versions do not support obsolete systems, so supportability is good in terms of Ubuntu Linux. For sustainability, it's quite a significant point of view for every organization. For us, Ubuntu Linux is the preferable way. For others, it might not be, so that is quite a subjective matter itself.
The pinpoint of the problem is that they take time because they need specific information. We need to go to AWS first, and then they'll contact the Ubuntu Linux support team itself. This creates a two-way hop for us, which is why it's not that great. It's not really Ubuntu Linux's problem but rather the way we are accessing Ubuntu Linux.
The migration part when migrating an application or one version of Ubuntu Linux to another is quite hectic. During the process, one or many applications might crash. That is something they could handle themselves, but I don't think that's something Ubuntu Linux will look into. During a migration project that I was handling, Ubuntu Linux was not completely compatible for the migration process from one application to another. This is an area they could improve in migrating from minor versions to major versions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Ubuntu Linux for three years now, and I've used different flavors from sixteen to twenty-two, and now it's the latest focal, which is twenty-five.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
For me, it's quite simple because we don't frequently update the stack itself. For many people, it is subjective because if you're running very dynamic applications, not only on Ubuntu Linux but any Linux systems, it can be quite subjective based on the applications they are using. If updates happen frequently, no system would be stable without tuning it every time there's an update. For us, it's quite reliable in terms of stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Any Linux is scalable in terms of capacity, and on a day-to-day basis, we use scalability options with the help of Kubernetes clusters. It's very good as there is no technical reasoning against it because Ubuntu Linux itself is a lightweight OS, so it's very convenient to scale it up to any form needed.
How are customer service and support?
The main issue is that they take time because they need specific information. We need to go to AWS first, and then they'll contact the Ubuntu Linux support team itself. This creates a two-way hop for us, which is why it's not that great. It's not really Ubuntu Linux's problem but rather the way we are accessing Ubuntu Linux.
How would you rate customer service and support?
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Ubuntu Linux a 9 out of 10. Any Linux is scalable in terms of capacity, and on a day-to-day basis, we use scalability options with the help of Kubernetes clusters. It's very good as there is no technical reasoning against it because Ubuntu Linux itself is a lightweight OS, so it's very convenient to scale it up to any form needed.
The migration part when migrating an application or one version of Ubuntu Linux to another is quite hectic. During the process, one or many applications might crash. That is something they could handle themselves, but I don't think that's something Ubuntu Linux will look into. During a migration project that I was handling, Ubuntu Linux was not completely compatible for the migration process from one application to another. This is an area they could improve in migrating from minor versions to major versions.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Using Ubuntu has been a great experience. It's fast, stable, and perfect for coding.
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about Ubuntu is its speed, stability, and the freedom to customize everything. What’s most helpful is the strong community support and easy access to open-source tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I dislike about Ubuntu is occasional software compatibility issues, especially with certain proprietary apps. The least helpful part is dealing with hardware drivers — sometimes they require manual fixes.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ubuntu solves problems like high system resource usage and lack of control in other OSes. It gives me a fast, customizable, and open-source environment that’s perfect for development.
Open-source nature enables flexible programming and device integration
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use
Ubuntu Linux for programming in embedded systems. My laptop runs
Ubuntu Linux, and I have installed various IDEs and open-source software on it. For microcontroller programming, I utilize AVR and STM32. In addition, I design electronic circuit boards using KiCad.
What is most valuable?
Ubuntu Linux is lightweight, fast, and works seamlessly with command-line terminals. It is resource-saving and suitable for automation through scripting. Additionally, Ubuntu Linux's open-source nature supports community contributions, bolstering its development and support ecosystem. This flexibility allows for efficient programming and integration with various devices.
What needs improvement?
While Ubuntu Linux offers flexibility, it can lack support, especially when utilizing new versions. Stability issues occur when integrating new components due to physical or technical challenges. Additionally, I would like to see more flexibility in integrating Ubuntu Linux with newer devices, particularly in terms of CPU performance, RAM upgrades, and power-saving features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Ubuntu Linux every day for over three years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
I face no significant challenges during Ubuntu Linux deployment. For example, setting up Ubuntu Linux on a Raspberry Pi involves a simple process of copying Linux onto an SD card, which takes about five minutes. However, configuring Ubuntu Linux for a server setup can be more complex and time-consuming, requiring up to a week.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Ubuntu Linux is generally stable, though there can be occasional issues with new hardware integration. Previously, I encountered downtime due to a new switch core integration, which resulted from physical cable problems rather than software issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Ubuntu Linux is scalable. In a server environment, it can seamlessly adapt to increased customer demand. Alarms help monitor resource usage, allowing for timely responses to scaling needs.
How are customer service and support?
I utilize community resources and
ChatGPT for support. The community around Ubuntu Linux is beneficial, providing answers to questions and assisting with issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used Windows. Windows is a closed system, which makes flexibility and integration with various devices challenging compared to the more flexible open-source nature of Ubuntu Linux.
How was the initial setup?
Ubuntu Linux setup is straightforward, with documented guidelines. It includes backing up systems regularly, automating processes through scripts, and ensuring stable configurations for different use cases.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Ubuntu Linux is open-source, leading to cost savings through its free availability. Its resource efficiency further reduces costs by optimizing system performance.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
During discussions, I've worked with both Windows and Ubuntu Linux, comparing their features and capabilities.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend using Ubuntu Linux for its faster processing capabilities and lightweight nature. Ubuntu Linux is ideal for tasks demanding high performance and flexibility. It's highly customizable, making it suitable for a wide range of applications, from server environments to embedded systems. My overall rating for Ubuntu Linux is eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Best OS for Research Scientists
What do you like best about the product?
Open source , Easy to use, Gnome updates . Regular updates , Inbuilt coding platform. Virus free.
What do you dislike about the product?
Become heavier day by day. Loosing smoothness. Eats lots of RAM.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
All the coding environment are intigrated . Lots of software support via snap store.
Ubuntu server: A very nice experience
What do you like best about the product?
I usually setup servers to host websites and such, and Ubuntu server just makes that job a breeze, it contains all the normal tools you'd want, and is setup quite fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
I honestly don't think I can find anything I particularly dislike about it, it's just plain old ubuntu with no GUI, I would say I'd like to have some sort of web UI available to look at some quick statistics without ssh, but setting that up using external packages isn't hard by any means.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows me to easily install it on a local server or a vm on azure/aws and quickly setup a hosting server for any web application we develop.
Reliable, Stable, User-friendly
What do you like best about the product?
It offers an easy to use Graphical User Interface, offering reliable functionality.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not a lot of sofwtare options compared with other commercial Operating Systems
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Reliable Linux Distribution with minimal hardware requirements
Efficient for large enterprices
What do you like best about the product?
It provides an intuitive setup process, with options to install additional software directly during setup, such as OpenSSH for remote access.
Here’s a breakdown of some key aspects:
Ease of Use
Performance and Stability
Security Features
Community and Support
Compatibility
Drawbacks
What do you dislike about the product?
Apart from all prons it has a con that it required so much memory and power of my laptop.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The security. Ubntu provide high class security and i like it most.
Ubuntu-OS
What do you like best about the product?
It has best database management system can be used for enterprise level softwares and provides enhance privacy
What do you dislike about the product?
Its not user friendly for personal computers and not suitable for cPanel and other middleware
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Best thing is it is Custemizable OS with well supported team at any time and is a great option for web development
