Skyhigh Security Service Edge (SSE) (AWS Private Offer Only)

The typical use case for our clients is cloud security.

The cloud security features are the most valuable. The solution significantly helps in enhancing security management. It also contributes to operational cost savings.

The solution has room for improvement in its DDoS protection. Additionally, the documentation needs enhancement to provide easier setup for users.

I have used the solution for two years.

I rate the stability as seven out of ten.

I rate the scalability as eight out of ten.

The initial setup was challenging, and the documentation could be improved to make it easier.

I would recommend Skyhigh Security to others. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Skyhigh Security  is used as a proxy security tool, including forward proxy and reverse proxy functionalities. If any client faces an issue related to proxy settings, I use Skyhigh Proxy to troubleshoot and fix the problem.

The tool has efficiently supported global operations with a large number of users, providing a good security posture while maintaining cost efficiency.

Skyhigh Security  is user-friendly in terms of configuration and UI. Customer support has been very helpful to my team, resolving most of the problems we encounter. Its name in the market is also a positive aspect.

Skyhigh Security needs more features, such as enhanced dashboards and login activity tracking. Updates sometimes introduce bugs, and Skyhigh Security needs to revalidate its versions before rolling out updates.

I have been working with Skyhigh Security for nearly two years.

The stability is rated seven out of ten. Sometimes updates introduce bugs, which requires Skyhigh Security to improve validation before updates are released.

The scalability is rated seven out of ten. While it is easy to deploy and use, there is a need to improve some features and indexes.

Customer support is rated eight out of ten. They are always very helpful and resolve most of the problems.

Positive

Previously, we used McAfee before it was acquired by Skyhigh. We have been using this tool for more than a decade.

The initial setup process was not challenging and is considered average in difficulty. It was rated seven out of ten.

I am not aware of the return on investment for the deployment of Skyhigh Security.

The pricing is rated six out of ten. Skyhigh Security is more cost-efficient and offers good security compared to other solutions in the market.

We did not evaluate other options; this has been our tool for over a decade.

Skyhigh Security stands out in the market due to its cost efficiency and good security solutions compared to competitors.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We have better data protection after implementing the product.

The product enables us to scan files for viruses and vulnerabilities. The threat protection capabilities are very strong. The product handles our compliance and governance challenges well. It enhances our security.

It is difficult for non-technical people to learn the tool. There are no training videos available for the product.

I have been using the solution for about five years.

We used Cisco IronPort before. It was very expensive, so we switched to Skyhigh.

The implementation is very easy.

The tool is not expensive. The cost is comparable to other products in the market. The licensing model is perfect.

I have also used Cisco Firepower.

I am a reseller. The solution does not have an AI mechanism, but it is connected to an SIEM system. The SIEM system has AI, and Skyhigh transports the events to the SIEM system. We are planning to stay with Skyhigh Security. We have integrated the solution with our existing infrastructure.

I will recommend the tool to others. The tool has all the features I need. It is very popular in our country. Many companies and government organizations use it. Bigger companies use the solution more. Small companies in our country do not use security products. The solution’s website provides documentation. I learned the tool myself.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

We use the solution to provide security to remote users.

Skyhigh offers solutions like WLP and CASB. These tools provide instructions and guidelines for enhancing data security. Additionally, they offer additional software solutions for further protection.

Skyhigh Security is complex to manage. While it should ideally be more user-friendly, customers often find themselves having to manage it post-deployment.

I have been using Skyhigh Security for six months.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

The initial setup is straightforward. It takes 30 minutes for normal while for bigger deployment, it may take upto two hours. You have to install the agent, and install the certificate. One engineer is enough to deploy to maintain the solution.

The pricing varies depending on factors such as requirements and the management. While it may not be the cheapest option, it's generally reasonable for what it offers. Ultimately, the cost depends on the deal and the level of service required.

FortiGuard is a little easy to manage.

The functionality of Skyhigh Security is comprehensive, but it may be complex for our customers. The technical team can navigate it, ordinary users may find it daunting without extensive research. They may require assistance from MSP for effective management. The portal should be designed to be user-friendly, ensuring ease of understanding for the IT team or any other relevant department.

The DLP component ensures compliance with HIPAA and PI regulations. They maintain a static portal to track other compliance requirements they're adhering to.

I recommend the solution. However, they'll need well-trained professionals to manage it effectively. If you have another VPN and connect it to this network, it may cause some issues and require constant troubleshooting. This could potentially block agents, so it's important to carefully configure the settings from the outset. Fine-tuning is necessary, so it's crucial to dedicate time and effort to the project.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.