Everlaw SaaS ediscovery solution (FedRAMP, GovCloud)

I used Everlaw for discovery, trial, depositions, and every other capability the platform offered.

I used the Storybuilder feature in Everlaw to prepare case timelines and link documents, and to create witness summaries, witness interview questions, and attach documents so I could prepare witnesses for trial.

I used Everlaw to operate paperless at trial and to review opposing counsel's exhibits in real time during trial. I also used the Storybuilder feature to track admitted exhibits.

The ability to handle the database in Everlaw without the need for a vendor is one of the best features. I can load documents myself, conduct productions independently, and the system is fast with easy searching. It is very user-friendly and does not require extensive training to use effectively.

The Data Visualizer in Everlaw is significant. It saves considerable time, and the way I can organize documents into binders is really helpful for my teams.

Everlaw positively impacts my organization because it speeds up review time and production timelines. It allows anyone to use it without the need for extensive ESI experience.

I would like Everlaw to be easier to use when adding documents as new versions. For instance, I would load the deposition exhibits and trial exhibits as new versions to the documents so that I did not have multiple random copies scattered throughout the database. I would appreciate if this process were simplified.

I used Everlaw for approximately four years.

Compared to other ESI software where you must wait and watch the program process while you are waiting to perform other tasks, Everlaw is instant when performing those operations.

I recommend that others looking into using Everlaw should not hesitate because it is cheaper, faster, and easier than any other ESI database.

When I first used Everlaw in the beta version and shortly after it was initially rolled out, it struggled with summarizing construction documents, and its accuracy in reviewing transcripts was adequate. I would rate this review a 9.

My main use case for Everlaw is document review.

A quick specific example of how I use Everlaw for document review is for antitrust review. In addition to antitrust review, I also use Everlaw for privilege review.

The best feature Everlaw offers is ease of use.

What makes Everlaw easy to use is its interface.

Everlaw has positively impacted my organization because it has been effective.

Everlaw has saved me time and made processes more efficient, as it has been easier to use than some software such as Exterro.

Everlaw can be improved because there could be more tutorials for new users.

There is nothing else besides tutorials that I want to add regarding needed improvements.

I have been using Everlaw for three years.

Everlaw is stable.

The scalability of Everlaw is good.

I previously used a different solution, which was Relativity.

Before choosing Everlaw, I evaluated other options including Relativity and Casepoint.

My advice to others looking into using Everlaw is to read the tutorials.

My main use case for Everlaw is document review. I use Everlaw for the review of medical records to create chronological documents in my day-to-day work. Everlaw helps me with reviewing medical records and creating those chronological documents by having all the documents within one database where I can quickly look through them, which is really helpful.

I find that the codes I can create in Everlaw are really helpful in filtering information, enhancing my experience with the software so far.

In my opinion, the best features Everlaw offers include its central database and the coding technology to organize the data. Having it centralized means that I don't have to switch between multiple programs in order to view the document set.

I think Everlaw can be improved because there is a lot of training that could use some work. It is a lot of information to learn about a software and sometimes that training is not individualized for my specific cases.

I have been using Everlaw for two years.

Customer service received a rating of 4.

In my opinion, the best features Everlaw offers include its central database and the coding technology to organize the data. My advice to others looking into using Everlaw is to know that it requires a lot of training in order to use the software to its full capacity. I would rate this product an 8.

My main use case for Everlaw is document review. I use Everlaw for document review to quickly search and redact documents for prosecution purposes.

The best features Everlaw offers are AI and the ability to produce directly out of the platform.

The AI features and direct production of Everlaw have helped my work by allowing us to review quickly and more efficiently, and it allows us to produce discovery in a much more efficient manner.

Everlaw has positively impacted my organization by allowing for quicker and more efficient discovery productions, and it has also decreased the errors in discovery.

Everlaw can be improved in the file structure, allowing us to load files more recently and accommodate different page numbers.

I have been using Everlaw for three years.

I rate Everlaw a ten on a scale of one to ten. I chose a ten for my rating because I feel Everlaw is the best review platform available.

Regarding Everlaw's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security seem very secure so far. I am still testing the accuracy and reliability of its output.

My advice to others looking into using Everlaw is to make sure you review the knowledge base and get certified in whatever area helps you the most.

I give Everlaw an overall rating of ten.