SnapLogic

My main use case for SnapLogic is dragging and dropping files from one SFTP to another SFTP.

A specific example of a workflow I set up using SnapLogic is picking up files from our SFTP which our system creates and drops there, then moving them across to our reconciliation team, a third party that does our reconciliation on an automated schedule.

The best features SnapLogic offers in my experience are that once you have your head around it initially, it is quite easy to use and can take away time from the development team because people with less technical skills can use it.

The learning curve at the start took maybe a couple of weeks just to know where things were, but there was a tutorial which helped with that, so for example, displaying the documents made it easier for less technical users.

SnapLogic has impacted my organization positively because many of the automations we made with dragging and dropping files used to be done by a human, so now there is less human error and it saves the team as it requires fewer people to do the work. There are two people less from a seven-person team now thanks to SnapLogic. I would estimate maybe an hour a day is saved, although I do not have exact numbers on time saved.

The only thing I do not prefer at the minute about SnapLogic is when I go into the monitor, it can be a bit slow, so when I am trying to diagnose why something went wrong and I am searching, it can take a bit of time.

SnapLogic could be improved in the monitor performance area.

I have been using SnapLogic for about two and a half years, the whole time I have been at Vitesse.

SnapLogic has been stable in my experience with no crashes.

Regarding SnapLogic's scalability, we have not needed to scale it as it has been stable.

The customer support for SnapLogic has been good as whenever we have raised an issue, I get a response within 24 hours.

I did not previously use a different solution before SnapLogic, as SnapLogic was already in use at this company before I got here.

The learning curve at the start took maybe a couple of weeks just to know where things were, but there was a tutorial which helped with that, so for example, displaying the documents made it easier for less technical users.

I have seen a return on investment with SnapLogic.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, it works as expected.

I would describe my experience with SnapLogic's integration capabilities as very easy; the ones I have used have been very easy.

I would rate SnapLogic's documentation and learning resources as thorough and easy to get to when you click through the snaps to access them, so they were helpful when I was getting started.

Overall, the performance and speed of SnapLogic, aside from the monitor I mentioned, have been good because I have never had any issues.

The reliability and availability of SnapLogic have been good, as there was something on our side where the node restarted, but there were no major issues I have seen.

I would describe the ease of maintenance for SnapLogic as simple to keep things running smoothly.

My advice to others looking into using SnapLogic is to take your time and go through the tutorial when starting, just to get your head around everything before making a decision. I would rate SnapLogic a 7 overall.

The main use case for using SnapLogic is to integrate external systems to Syndigo. For example, we have XML files that need to be converted into our Syndigo format to create entities in the Syndigo system.

The best features are that we can quickly consume the Snaps which are already available, so we don't need to write scalable code. We can quickly integrate our systems via SnapLogic Snaps, and that speeds up our integration process.

The pre-developed Snaps are really helpful for both non-developers and developers, and that reduces the time for integrations significantly.

Implementing the pipeline quickly, rather than developing code, has impacted us tremendously.

If we develop the same integration using any of the latest technology, it would take a minimum of one or two months. Using SnapLogic, we can develop the same logic via Snaps within two or three weeks, which provides tremendous time saving as well as cost reduction.

When we face errors in the existing scheduler run, we cannot trace the logs. Adding more logs in the existing Snaps could make it much easier to debug errors.

If more logs were added to the existing Snap, users could debug errors and view log information more effectively.

I have been using SnapLogic for the last one year.

Customer support is really good.

Previously, we were using a private app via Java logic to integrate the system.

It has really saved our time when we are using SnapLogic integration systems.

We have not validated or evaluated any other options.

SnapLogic AI capabilities have good potential, particularly with the integration and automation features.

The AI provides accurate and useful outputs, especially for common integrations.

SnapLogic is easy to learn because SnapLogic itself provides documentation for each individual Snap, making it easy to read and understand the existing Snaps.

When creating the scheduler, we provided email notifications for successful scheduler runs or failed scenarios, so whenever we receive the email notification, we go and check the monitoring tool to debug the failed scenario.

It is easy to connect with external systems via the existing Snaps, something like the 365 Snap or the API endpoint Snap.

The documentation provided by SnapLogic is really helpful, and it is all up-to-date information.

SnapLogic has a mapper Snap where we need to configure the mapping, and for simple and collection mapping as well as complex mapping transformation, there is an individual syntax to transfer the data.

We have created multiple users to provide them access only to specific project access.

SnapLogic processes a large amount of data within a shorter period of time and has good scalability for handling large integration data. I would rate this review 9 out of 10.

I have been using SnapLogic for one and a half years on various multiple projects from the perspective of data migration and ingestions.

My main use case for SnapLogic is migrating some legacy product data to our newest products.

A specific example of a migration project I handled with SnapLogic involved our legacy product, which has multiple modules within it.

Regarding my main use case and other ways I use SnapLogic, we import the data as part of the ingestion process. We edit the data into an Excel tool in an Excel sheet and, using SnapLogic, read the data from the Excel sheet and load it into our newest product.

The best features SnapLogic offers in my experience include excellent REST APIs and batch processing, which is a standout feature.

Batch processing has helped us load around five to six lakh records within two to three hours, which involves loading thousands of records in a single shot. This helped our process reduce from eight hours to a couple of hours.

SnapLogic has positively impacted my organization because the professional services team has been running the pipelines and migrations very easily without any technical knowledge or dependency on technicalities.

This has made my team more efficient and freed up time for other projects. It significantly reduced the migration timeline for multiple customers, as there is no dependency on developers to run the migrations, allowing us to move to other particular migrations from the development perspective instead of running the same pipeline and staying on the same product.

API integrations are also really good to handle from a front-end perspective or any interface perspective regarding the features.

Regarding how SnapLogic can be improved, I think the Snaplex page can be improved without any downtime. There are some updates with SnapLogic that are not very stable before the release. This can be improved so that there will be no downtime impact for us.

I have been using SnapLogic for one and a half years on various multiple projects from the perspective of data migration and ingestions.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, the accuracy and reliability of output are 50-50, but there is a lot of scope for improvement because I cannot rely on SnapLogic or SnapLogic AI or SnapGPT for the development which I am currently handling.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, I think the governance and security are fine, but there is some scope for improvement with respect to security and access to personal level data.

The advice I would give to others looking into using SnapLogic is that it is a low-code tool and can be helpful for people who are just getting into software engineering or data engineering. This should help developers gain much confidence before starting with coding.

I am not really sure about the details of a business relationship with SnapLogic other than being a customer, but I am sure that we are a customer of SnapLogic. I do not know what kind of business relationship exists.

I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

My main use case for SnapLogic is importing data to my CRM. I use SnapLogic by taking data from the JustGiving platform through an import file dropped into a specific location and loading it into my CRM.

The best features SnapLogic offers include its low-code nature, which makes it relatively easy for developers to pick up, and it has a wide range of connectors.

Reusability has been important for us with SnapLogic as well as being able to build MinePlexes and reuse them. We are also getting to grips with some of the AI capability.

SnapLogic has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to remove a big risk and cost in removing a legacy integration platform, and we have built the foundations to gain significant efficiencies in our integrations.

We want to get to grips with some of the automated testing functionality in SnapLogic, but we have not had the time to do that yet.

The main frustrations for us with SnapLogic have not been the technology, but the usual things of stakeholder capacity constraints and other hold-ups to the project.

One improvement that would be beneficial is better visibility of SnapLogic's environmental credentials.

I have been using SnapLogic for 18 months.

SnapLogic has been reliable for me with no downtime or disruptions.

SnapLogic's scalability as our needs grow or change is good.

The customer support for SnapLogic is very good.

I do not have any specific outcomes or metrics to share regarding time or money saved or how my team's workload has changed.

Learning SnapLogic for my team was fairly easy.

My experience with SnapLogic's documentation and learning resources is pretty good, although it always feels as though there is more to learn.

SnapLogic's integration with my existing systems and tools is easy and good.

SnapLogic's performance and speed when handling large data volumes are good. We have hit some snags, but we believe that is more on our CRM side than SnapLogic.

My advice to others looking into using SnapLogic is to go for it. I would rate this review as a 9.