Listing Thumbnail

    SharePoint Server 2010 Standard On Windows Server 2019

     Info
    Deployed on AWS
    AWS Free Tier
    This is a repackaged software product wherein additional charges apply for hardening, bundling and support. SharePoint Server 2010 Standard deployment
    4.1

    Overview

    This is a repackaged software product wherein additional charges apply for hardening, bundling and support. SharePoint Server 2010 Standard is a Microsoft product, the on premises collaboration and document management platform. It provides team sites, document libraries, and enterprise content management. This product has reached end of extended support; Microsoft no longer ships security updates for it. This image is intended for teams that need a documented SharePoint Server 2010 Standard deployment on aws without building the environment by hand. Review Microsoft's official lifecycle and product documentation for current servicing, security update, and compatibility guidance before production use.

    Cognosys is the world's largest publisher on All public Clouds with over 750+ images and 150+ Containers. If you need any specific OS with any specific Open Source or proprietary stack which is not available on Cloud Marketplace, we can provide you with your custom marketplace image without any additional charges. Please send a Custom Image Request  or Email us.

    We can provide confidential images locked to only your subscription in case you want your confidential IP/Data on your golden image.

    Highlights

    • Official SharePoint Server 2010 Standard deployment.
    • Documented against Microsoft's lifecycle page for aws.
    • You need an existing license to use this product. It is intended for customers who already have licenses and are migrating from on-premises or another cloud. Contact us to purchase a new license.

    Details

    Delivery method

    Delivery option
    64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)

    Latest version

    Operating system
    Win2012R2 2021.09.23

    Deployed on AWS
    New

    Introducing multi-product solutions

    You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.

    Multi-product solutions

    Features and programs

    Buyer guide

    Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
    Buyer guide

    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    Pricing

    SharePoint Server 2010 Standard On Windows Server 2019

     Info
    Pricing is based on actual usage, with charges varying according to how much you consume. Subscriptions have no end date and may be canceled any time. Alternatively, you can pay upfront for a contract, which typically covers your anticipated usage for the contract duration. Any usage beyond contract will incur additional usage-based costs.
    Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator  to estimate your infrastructure costs.
    If you are an AWS Free Tier customer with a free plan, you are eligible to subscribe to this offer. You can use free credits to cover the cost of eligible AWS infrastructure. See AWS Free Tier  for more details. If you created an AWS account before July 15th, 2025, and qualify for the Legacy AWS Free Tier, Amazon EC2 charges for Micro instances are free for up to 750 hours per month. See Legacy AWS Free Tier  for more details.

    Usage costs (72)

     Info
    Dimension
    Cost/hour
    t2.medium
    Recommended
    $3.20
    t2.micro
    $3.20
    c3.2xlarge
    $3.20
    d2.4xlarge
    $3.20
    i3.large
    $3.20
    t2.small
    $3.20
    i3.8xlarge
    $3.20
    x1.32xlarge
    $3.20
    i2.8xlarge
    $3.20
    cg1.4xlarge
    $3.20

    Vendor refund policy

    We do not currently support refunds, but you can cancel at any time.

    How can we make this page better?

    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.
    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.

    Legal

    Vendor terms and conditions

    Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .

    Content disclaimer

    Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.

    Usage information

     Info

    Delivery details

    64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)

    Amazon Machine Image (AMI)

    An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.

    Version release notes

    Updated with latest patches

    Additional details

    Usage instructions

    Connect to RDC and follow instructions

    Resources

    Vendor resources

    Support

    Vendor support

    Cognosys provides technical support for Solution issues in multiple ways.Support can be availed by: 1. Email to Support@SecureAnyCloud.com  (Preferred) 2. Live Support on

    AWS infrastructure support

    AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

    Product comparison

     Info
    Updated weekly

    Accolades

     Info
    Top
    100
    In Source Control, Project Management
    Top
    10
    In Data Warehouses, Databases & Analytics Platforms, Databases
    Top
    25
    In Financial Services, Databases

    Customer reviews

     Info
    Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
    Reviews
    Functionality
    Ease of use
    Customer service
    Cost effectiveness
    1 reviews
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    0 reviews
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Positive reviews
    Mixed reviews
    Negative reviews

    Overview

     Info
    AI generated from product descriptions
    Collaboration Platform
    On-premises collaboration and document management platform for team-based work environments
    Document Management
    Document libraries and enterprise content management capabilities for organizing and storing organizational content
    Team Site Functionality
    Team sites for creating dedicated spaces for group collaboration and information sharing
    Pre-configured Deployment
    Pre-built and documented deployment image eliminating manual environment configuration requirements
    High Availability Architecture
    Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) with high availability architecture across multiple Amazon Availability Zones and Amazon S3 for database backups designed to exceed 11 9s of durability
    AI Vector Search Capability
    Oracle Database 23ai AI Vector Search functionality for enhancing application intelligence and enabling vector-based search operations
    Exadata Hardware Infrastructure
    Oracle Exadata Database Service on Dedicated Infrastructure and Oracle Autonomous Database on Dedicated Exadata Infrastructure running on optimized Oracle Exadata hardware
    Zero-ETL Data Integration
    Zero-ETL integrations to unify data across Oracle and AWS for analytics, machine learning, and generative AI workloads
    Multi-Console Provisioning and Management
    Provisioning through AWS Management Console, CLI, or API with database instance creation and management through OCI console
    Distributed SQL Database Architecture
    Cloud-native, distributed SQL database with multi-region deployment capabilities and Postgres-compatible SQL interface supporting ACID transactions.
    High Availability and Fault Tolerance
    99.99% availability SLA for single-region deployments and 99.999% for multi-region deployments with automatic failover across nodes, availability zones, and AWS regions.
    Security and Encryption Controls
    Customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK), egress perimeter controls, private connectivity including AWS PrivateLink, and advanced security controls in Mission Critical edition.
    Elastic Scalability and Storage Model
    Usage-based storage billing with provisioned compute, elastic scalability across regions, and automatic scaling without manual resizing requirements.
    Change Data Capture and Replication
    Data Sync add-on providing change data capture to downstream systems and Data Replication capabilities metered only during active use.

    Contract

     Info
    Standard contract
    No
    No

    Customer reviews

    Ratings and reviews

     Info
    4.1
    10 ratings
    5 star
    4 star
    3 star
    2 star
    1 star
    30%
    70%
    0%
    0%
    0%
    1 AWS reviews
    |
    9 external reviews
    External reviews are from PeerSpot .
    Balogun Peter

    Centralized workspace has improved collaboration and now keeps documents organized and accessible

    Reviewed on Oct 07, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    We use Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 on a 24x7 basis for team collaboration, teamwork, and work involvement.

    You can integrate Microsoft Word and Excel for financials and calculations with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. We have been using it for large projects, and it has really helped to make our work clean and stored in one central place. We can hold our meetings on it and make use of different functions while keeping everything clean and well organized.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has impacted us positively. We no longer need to search for files, and files are not being lost. Files are well arranged and well stored, and information is well kept. Everything looks more clean and clear, and it makes it wonderful to use.

    We can request any back-dated file we want to check in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, going back two years or more, or three years or more, depending on the capacity we have arranged on Sharepoint. This makes it good when there are any discrepancies anywhere, as we can easily go back to the file, take it, and use it. If there is any damage or issue with anybody's access to it, there is always another person that can access it, which makes it wonderful.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers is the way it makes work storage in one central place, making it look easy for colleagues and the HR to navigate and see different files all at once in one place.

    When you mention storage and easy navigation in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, it saves time and reduces confusion. It makes all files accessible anytime, and it makes it easy for anybody without asking my colleagues for different files. I can just go there and pick files up and use them. It makes the work easier and faster, and it makes everything well organized.

    It makes it easy for you to search for any document in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. You can create different folders and set different permissions for different files for different people and different staffs, and it is the best for me.

    What needs improvement?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 could be improved when you have more AI integrated on it to make work faster and easier. AI is a tool that we always want to use, and a well-improved AI integration will make it better.

    There should be improvement with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. A good user interface would make a lot of sense. It can be redesigned to something better and something nicer. Ideally, it can be more accommodating for larger people, larger files, and larger things.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 for four years now.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is stable in my experience. It is very stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Regarding the scalability of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I think it is very scalable. There is always room for improvement, and it can always get better. We have millions of people using it already, and it is very scalable. It is one of the best tools you can see out there.

    How are customer service and support?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has great customer support. They respond on time and send every necessary detail you need. Any question you ask, they are always there to help you. It is fantastic, and I give them a ten out of ten.

    I rate the customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 a ten. They are good and very good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have not used a different solution before. I am really satisfied with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.

    What was our ROI?

    Regarding a return on investment from Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, fewer employees are needed. Money has been saved on raw files and printed documents. It has really saved time and the stress of overusing your phones for work when you have your work on a hub on your phone or any other device, laptop, or PC. It saves a lot.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I think that is really fair. Looking at the work it helps us do on time, faster and cleaner, the pricing and setup cost are very fair.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I have seen people talk about Slack and different ones before choosing Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. After I started using Sharepoint, I do not have any reason to use another. It has made my work easy and simple.

    What other advice do I have?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is one of the best, and I give it an eight on a scale of one to ten, which represents my overall rating for this product.

    Regarding Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7's AI capabilities, it is awesome. It protects data very well, and I do not have any issue with that. Sharepoint is really trusted.

    Regarding Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7's AI capabilities, it provides a very good response, and its level of accuracy is actually good. I could rate that on a nine.

    Please use Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. It is going to make your work good. It is going to make everything look easier, faster, and better. It will save your cost, arrange your files, and connect your staff and your client, everything all in one. It is good, and you can use it.

    Kristine Parrinelli

    Organizing team documentation and running agile boards has improved collaboration and accuracy

    Reviewed on Sep 23, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    I have been using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 for about two years.

    My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is to store documentation, images, and marketing materials, as well as using the planner as a Scrum board.

    A specific example of how I use it for storing documentation or as a Scrum board is that the planner board we use to create stories on projects that the team will be working on, as well as assigning to individuals for specific topics that they will be handling and to be able to track the progression of where the project is. When we hold our daily stand-ups, we can go through the board quickly and everyone can discuss what is going on and if they have any hold-ups. Since we're a small company, we did not want to invest in a Jira board, and the planner board works out perfectly for us since we also use Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 to store all of our documentations and organize our marketing materials and images.

    What is most valuable?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers the ability to send an email when you update an area if you want to tag somebody in it or they're already tagged in an area, and I also appreciate that the link is easy to copy and paste in Slack for the team to go directly to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 to see what you've created and give it a review and edit it there.

    I also value the permissions feature, so once a document is done, you can lock it and people can view it and share it, but it cannot be manipulated or changed if you are the owner of it. The integration with the planner tools is really helpful, allowing our team to use Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 in an agile way.

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted our organization by keeping us organized, allowing us to share our documentation with clients, and helping our team review things in a timely fashion. I have noticed specific outcomes, such as fewer mistakes because we have documents that we can lock down and not have to worry about a client changing anything when we're making a deal.

    What needs improvement?

    I think Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 could be improved if the planner section had more features instead of the limited buckets such as in progress, complete, and future backlog. It would be beneficial to have options to indicate if you are held up and waiting for somebody else, so that they are tagged in that instead of having to write it in the comments, which would keep the status accurate on the project.

    Regarding needed improvements, I think the interface can always be improved with AI. Everything can have a more modern appearance, and I think overall, brighter colors and faster speed would help with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 appears to be stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    As for scalability, as our usage increases and our team fluctuates, we have never encountered an issue. We can quickly add a user, get them set up, and access is never a problem. It is equally easy to remove somebody.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support can sometimes involve long phone calls on hold if you call in directly. It would be beneficial if there was an AI option where you can get in contact with somebody much quicker instead of having to call.

    I would rate customer support a seven, as once you finally speak to somebody, they are very knowledgeable and capable of helping you resolve the issue. However, the wait time to actually talk to someone is not that great.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have not previously used a different solution.

    What was our ROI?

    While I do not have specific metrics, I can say that time is saved because of how easily we are able to create a planner board, save documents, and share them with our partners and clients. As a small group, we have a controlled environment for our documentation and marketing images, allowing us to quickly access them.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I do not handle that directly. I know we have a small team, and I'm assuming that our CEO finds the cost to be acceptable because we have been continuing to use it for two years.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, we did not evaluate other options. The company only wanted Microsoft Office.

    What other advice do I have?

    For others looking into using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I think it is a wonderful tool for a small team just starting in a startup, as well as for a large team, since there are many documentations that companies have. Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 helps organize them in a way that suits your needs and your company's needs. Additionally, there are other features if you do not want to buy additional applications that you can use similarly in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, which is how we found the planner. I would rate this product a nine overall.

    davidmwilliams

    Centralized intranet has improved collaboration and simplified access to internal forms and news

    Reviewed on Aug 04, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has been as an internal company intranet, serving as a repository for all our forms, procedures, and documents, as well as providing daily news and a monthly focus on a particular person. Primarily, it is the main company portal for all news, including how people submit expense reimbursements or apply for leave, making it the home place for all the company's internal forms and processes.

    Before using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, my team handled submitting forms and sharing news through shared file shares that were scattered across different locations, leading to issues such as misplaced files. News was primarily shared via email, creating a chaotic environment where new employees struggled to locate necessary documents, which became streamlined once we transitioned to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted our organization by consolidating all company forms and documents into a single repository, creating a great intranet that avoids the issues of scattered file shares and email communications. Setting the intranet as a homepage ensured that everyone had easy access to news and forms.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers include a new Fluent ribbon-type interface that modernizes the look, making it more compatible with the changes in Office and still favored by Microsoft today, along with facilities for managing metadata. It also introduces Office Web Apps, allowing for direct editing of Word, Excel, and PowerPoint documents in the browser, which wasn't possible in previous versions, enhancing usability and collaboration capabilities.

    My team responded positively to these changes, finding that collaboration improved significantly, as we previously faced constant complaints about locked Excel spreadsheets on file shares. The ability for multiple people to edit documents in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 simultaneously transformed how we worked, as it eliminated the frustrations of file locking, making daily tasks much easier.

    What needs improvement?

    Regarding potential improvements for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I note that both products, including the server version, are out of support, so ideally, there should be extended long-term support for security fixes. For most users, I would recommend transitioning to a newer Sharepoint version or using the managed Sharepoint available in Office 365.

    If I could change anything about Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I sometimes wish it were as user-friendly as Lotus Notes, but overall, it was a great innovation that made Sharepoint more usable than previous versions.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 for about ten years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 was scalable. You could add extra Sharepoint nodes into a cluster, host data on a SAN or NAS, and utilize additional Windows servers in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 environment.

    How are customer service and support?

    We never used customer support, but it was provided by Microsoft, which could be a hit or miss depending on the engineer's expertise.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We did not have a sophisticated solution before. We relied on file shares and email, which were unstructured and unorganized, prompting us to switch to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.

    What about the implementation team?

    I cannot recall specifics, but licensing was not a major issue at the time, and I believe Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 was available with Windows Server at no extra cost. We did bring in a consultant to help set up the intranet and provide best practice guidance, but apart from that, I do not remember any pricing issues.

    What was our ROI?

    While I do not have specific metrics, I can state that Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 led to significant time savings, particularly in collaboration, finding information, and onboarding new employees, but it did not directly affect our headcount or profitability.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, we did not evaluate other options.

    What other advice do I have?

    We experienced a learning curve as we had little prior experience with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, except for simple file repository use, which made managing permissions and creating a more attractive Sharepoint page a bit challenging for us.

    My advice for others considering Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is to assess whether they will connect their machine to the internet, as it is no longer supported and lacks security patches. If they already have the necessary hardware and licenses and prefer to avoid subscription fees, it is still a stable solution with plenty of resources available.

    I would rate this product an eight overall.

    Rajkumar Gupta

    Centralized file backups have improved secure sharing and simplified endpoint transitions

    Reviewed on Jul 22, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is storing and backing up files from endpoint devices while sharing files securely across users.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers include an audit feature and the ability to maintain a backup of all files remotely by an administrator.

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by giving all users a backup, and whenever there are endpoint changes, they can easily switch over.

    What needs improvement?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved by combining it with some other features, such as the ability to restrict a single file by an administrator.

    That would be the feature that we can add to improve the product.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 for the past five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is pretty much scalable.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I did not previously use a different solution, and we did not search for any other solution.

    What was our ROI?

    I have not seen a return on investment for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. I probably have not seen a clear use case for the return on investment, but it has been a value addition.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has been transparent and on par with other Microsoft products.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I did not evaluate other options.

    What other advice do I have?

    On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 a nine.

    I chose nine out of ten for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 because it is good software and it is reliable, robust, and scalable.

    Regarding Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7's governance and security, I think they are good and on par with other software.

    Regarding Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7's accuracy and reliability of output, I find it to be accurate and reliable.

    My advice to others looking into using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that if you are looking for a hassle-free implementation, go for it.

    My overall review rating for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is nine out of ten.

    A Bardone

    Document collaboration has become faster and access control is managed consistently

    Reviewed on Jul 07, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My customer uses Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 for sharing files and content. I work in the development of an application that traces all the files and the permissions in the file. The goal of this application is to ensure that there is no user that is not approved or has been removed or needs to be removed in order to maintain updates and user access to files.

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 serves as a repository of project documentation for the customer. There is a folder structure with a root folder for each project. In the folder, the structure is defined in a way to have the same route and the same contents for each project. The main folders are related to contract offerings, technical documents, sales, and each meeting that advances the project.

    What is most valuable?

    The main feature is the ease of use of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. A minor area for improvement is the search functionality. Sometimes it is difficult to search some content by key or by key tag. However, the other functionality is very good.

    I also appreciate the tag functionality of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. I can tag a folder in order to search all folders by tag.

    The main feature of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is making document management easier. Because it is very simple to use, I can use the console web to share documents from some users. It is very fast to edit the document together with other colleagues and share it without sending emails.

    The customer can see in a fast way if there is a user that needs to be removed because there are many documents and many users can use these documents. Very often, users can change their areas. When a user changes area, they cannot access some documents or some projects. Then the customer needs a fast way to check if a user is correctly removed or a fast way to remove a user from a folder.

    What needs improvement?

    Because sometimes I cannot find some documents by searching for words in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I don't know why, but it can be improved.

    If you can improve the search in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I could give a ten. At the moment, I give eight because it is easy to use and it works very well.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I used Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 five years ago for one year.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is stable in my experience.

    When I used Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I did not have any problems with performance.

    How are customer service and support?

    I have not needed customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I used an internal solution and ECM before Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. I used Exo Portal and Liferay as content management systems.

    What was our ROI?

    I have given the metrics relevant to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, but I need my users to save a lot of time. Before using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, they had to share files by email. They also shared files by USB key. With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 instead, they can collaborate in a very fast way.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I evaluated OpenText before choosing Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, but the cost of licenses is high.

    What other advice do I have?

    I developed this application with API. I use Sharepoint API to create this application. I created an executable file that the IT user can run and check the permissions.

    I give the advice to ensure and give a stable Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.

    I have not used the AI capabilities of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 because I did not need this feature. If it works, my installation does not have AI features because I used it five or three years ago.

    In my project, I do not use AI functionalities of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. I do not know if it is available.

    I work in the office with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. I do not work in the office that handles the provisioning of the server and the installation. I only use the installation as a user, which my IT department set up.

    I have given this product a review rating of eight.

    View all reviews