Tenable Security Center

The typical use case for Tenable Security Center  is that it is an on-premise solution, and it can use the agent and active scanning, which is needed by governmental organizations and manufacturers, so that is the benefit of the Security Center.

Tenable Security Center  is a relatively very good solution, and I don't think it needs improvement; it's a perfect solution.

I haven't experienced any trouble with Tenable Security Center so far, and the support is very timely and adequate; we are satisfied with that.

The reason for rating it an eight out of ten is that the initial setup could be easier; the setup is rather difficult, and that's why we are focusing on the initial hearing.

I have worked with Tenable Security Center for almost three years.

It is a very stable solution.

The solution is very scalable.

The technical support from Tenable Security Center is very good; I'm satisfied with the support.

I would rate it an eight when one is the worst technical support and ten is the best.

I don't have experience with the CrowdStrike tool.

Regarding the initial setup of this solution, we have discussions with the customer about how to operate the solution, and it depends on the customer how they can use and operate it. We need to hear the customer's requirements, and it's a very flexible solution.

I have seen an ROI from this solution. It is quick if it fits the customer's operation, and it is very suitable for their operation. If we cannot adjust how to operate the solution, then it becomes very difficult, so hearing and initial tuning are very important.

The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.

Based on my experience, I would recommend Tenable Security Center to other people. I rate this solution eight out of ten.

The primary use case for Tenable Security Center  among my clients is risk-based vulnerability management. It involves not just a one-time scan but a continuous workflow that integrates with management and auditing processes.

The most valuable features of Tenable Security Center  for my clients are Vulnerability Priority Rating (VPR) and Asset Criticality Scoring. The tool also excels in data correlation and reporting, providing crucial insights into security performance, and aiding in measuring service level agreements (SLA).

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.

I have ten years of experience working with Tenable Security Center.

The stability of the solution is outstanding. I have never encountered an issue, and in case of any problem, Tenable provides decent SLA support to manage recovery and license transfer effectively.

The scalability of Tenable Security Center is impressive. I can easily scale it on a platform level as a virtual appliance or adding additional scanners. Also extend with the use of agents, allowing scanning in restrictive environments and loosely connected devices.

Tenable's technical support has declined in quality over time. While they used to be excellent, achieving ratings of eight or nine, they now rate around six or seven due to longer response times and less thorough assistance.

Positive

The initial setup of Tenable Security Center is straightforward. Clients can use virtual appliances or the software, and the process is very Linux-friendly.

Through the use of Tenable Security Center, my clients achieve more efficient patching and gain visibility and understanding of security operations, leading to improved resilience and infrastructure insight.

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pricing. The licensing requirements can be prohibitive for managed security service providers with smaller clients.

I recommend Tenable Security Center, particularly if the pricing can be adjusted to compete better in regions like Central Eastern Europe. I would rate it 9.6 or 9.8 out of 10, as it needs minor improvements, particularly in localization and report flexibility in the age of AI. Overall, I rate the solution 9.8 out of 10.

I use Tenable Security Center  mainly to detect vulnerabilities. One of its core functions is its capability for asset discovery, which aids in improving our security posture.

The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center  for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping. 

Additionally, the asset discovery feature significantly aids in enhancing the security posture.

There are challenges with customization in Tenable Security Center. In the next release, it should provide advanced testing and more accurate results. 

It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys.

I have been using Tenable Security Center for one and a half years.

Tenable Security Center is relatively stable, and on a scale from one to ten, I would rate its stability a seven.

Scalability is a bit limited with Tenable Security Center. I rate it six out of ten in terms of ease of scaling.

I've had varied experiences with Tenable support. The support service should be faster or provide better quality support.

Positive

Setting up Tenable Security Center is moderately easy. If rated on a scale from one to ten, it would be around five or six.

The cost of Tenable Security Center is reasonable for our company.

Before selecting Tenable, we evaluated other options like Qualys.

My advice for those considering Tenable Security Center is to note the benefit of upgrading vulnerable devices. 

Overall, I would rate Tenable Security Center eight out of ten.

In my previous job, Tenable Security Center  was used for a financial institution covering approximately eight thousand assets including servers, computers, network devices, and web applications. The scope was to scan every device within the IT environment. It is a robust solution with numerous plugins that streamline the scanning process, providing powerful results.

Tenable Security Center  provides an overall score of vulnerabilities, comparing an organization with others in the same industry. For example, it allows financial institutions to compare their vulnerability management to others in the same sector. This provides a comprehensive view of the organization's vulnerability status.

While Tenable Security Center is highly effective, there is always room for continuous improvements. The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements. Overall, it is a very effective solution.

I have had experience with Tenable Security Center for about a year.

Tenable Security Center is stable and runs smoothly when correctly configured.

The customer service and support team at Tenable were extremely helpful. They assisted us with any questions and provided support throughout the deployment process, making them a ten out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus , which focuses on endpoint vulnerabilities and includes patch management, unlike Tenable Security Center.

Although the setup requires preparation, it is manageable when everything necessary is set in advance, such as the firewall and user permissions.

The deployment involved about five to eight people, including a Tenable admin who coordinated with network, server, and PC teams. Tenable provided deployment assistance.

We were able to have a comprehensive view of all vulnerabilities across our assets, providing a single pane of glass to manage vulnerabilities.

The product is somewhat pricey, reflecting its valuable features and status as a high-quality solution in the vulnerability management market.

I rate Tenable Security Center ten out of ten. 

ManageEngine is also rated ten out of ten as it served different scopes and provided essential patch management features.

The primary use cases are vulnerability management and dashboard creation. I utilize it to exhibit the current security posture to higher management, prioritize which paths to fix first, and identify vulnerabilities. Additionally, I escalate issues to management based on their criticality and business rating.

Tenable Security Center  has significantly contributed to cost savings by identifying numerous bugs and security issues. It assists in safeguarding customer data, which is crucial to avoid fines imposed by local governing authorities.

The most valuable feature is the automatic and periodic management of security scans, along with the ability to consolidate all information into a single dashboard. This feature enables me to quickly identify which areas require attention, updating patches, and fixing bugs to stay protected against the latest security attacks.

The dashboard templates are limited. More templates that align with our daily needs would be beneficial. Current dashboards are available for Linux, separate unit systems, and other systems, but there aren't dashboards for app-related issues or application patches, such as Apache Tomcat  applications or Java applications. This would be helpful.

I have been using Tenable Security Center  for more than five years.

The solution is very stable. Still, it's not perfect. I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.

The solution is very scalable. It integrates easily with the environment, allowing for IP range management and concurrent scanning capabilities. I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.

Customer service is good. That said, there are sometimes delays in response from international support. The support teams can take time to analyze logs. I rate it as eight out of ten.

Positive

I previously used Qualys in a different organization, which I found difficult to use and not user-friendly. I chose Tenable Security Center for its user-friendly interface and feature set.

The initial setup was considerably tough due to deploying on Linux, yet it was manageable. I would rate its difficulty as seven out of ten.

We engaged partners from Singapore who remotely assisted with the deployment, supported by local partners for configuration and integration with SIEM  systems.

The ROI is substantial because it prevents data breaches that could lead to significant fines. By continuously updating patches as per Tenable Security Center's reports, we have avoided customer data leaks.

Tenable Security Center is considered pricey compared to other solutions, yet relatively cheaper than some like Qualys. However, when compared to Rapid7, it is more expensive. I rate the pricing six out of ten.

I evaluated Qualys and Rapid7 before choosing Tenable Security Center.

Proper configuration and automation are key to success with Tenable Security Center. Automating vulnerability scans and notifications can significantly reduce manual repetitive tasks, leading to better efficiency and time management.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.