
Overview

Product video
GitGuardian is an end-to-end secrets security platform that empowers software-driven organizations to enhance their Non-Human Identity (NHI) security and comply with industry standards.
With attackers increasingly targeting NHIs, such as service accounts and applications, GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability. This dual approach enables the detection of compromised secrets across your dev environments while also managing legitimate secrets and their lifecycle.
The platform supports over 450+ types of secrets, offers public monitoring for leaked data, and deploys honeytokens for added defense
Trusted by over 600,000 developers, GitGuardian is the choice of leading organizations like Snowflake, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom for robust secrets protection.
Highlights
- With Secrets Security, GitGuardian aims to eliminate leaks and sprawl, detecting compromised or misused secrets across both public and internal environments. This foundation of NHI security is strengthened by monitoring for incidents, policy violations, and illegitimate use of secrets.
- GitGuardian's Secrets Detection tackles internal secrets sprawl by identifying sensitive data in source code and productivity tools. The platform supports over 450 types of secrets, including API keys, private keys, and database credentials. With a robust policy engine, security teams can enforce rules across major Version Control Systems ( like GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, and Azure DevOps, CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Travis CI as well as tools like Slack, Jira, container registries, and more.
- To expand visibility beyond internal systems, GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub repositories, detecting sensitive information in both organizational and developers' personal repos. This is crucial, as 80% of corporate secrets leaked on public GitHub stem from personal accounts.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Security credentials achieved
(2)


Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
25 developers | Business Plan, per 25 contributing developers (annual contract) | $5,500.00 |
Vendor refund policy
Please contact sales@gitguardian.com to learn more about GitGuardian's refund policy.
Custom pricing options
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Support
Vendor support
Explore our guides to use the GitGuardian Platform https://docs.gitguardian.com or submit a support request at
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.


FedRAMP
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO/IEC 27001
PCI DSS
SOC 2 Type 2
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Automated secret detection has protected credentials and enables faster incident response
What is our primary use case?
As a SOC analyst, my main use case for GitGuardian Platform is to detect the exposure of secrets such as API keys, tokens, and passwords. It integrates with GitLab and Slack, allowing me to receive immediate alerts in Slack whenever a secret leaks in a commit. This helps me investigate incidents from the GitGuardian Platform dashboard efficiently.
From a SOC perspective, it aids in quickly identifying risk exposures and coordinating with developers for remediation. This is the primary use case.
In one scenario, a developer accidentally committed an API key into a GitHub repository, and within less than a minute, I received an alert in Slack from GitGuardian Platform. I quickly checked the alert, confirmed it was a valid key, informed the developer, and revoked and rotated the key immediately. If this was not detected quickly, that key could have been misused or exposed to the public, potentially allowing worldwide attackers or hackers to exploit it. This real-time detection has helped me significantly and has reduced the risk efficiently.
In another case, an API key was accidentally pushed into a GitHub commit, and GitGuardian Platform detected it within seconds. I immediately revoked the key before any misuse occurred. Without this tool, it could have gone unnoticed. GitGuardian Platform's primary use case for my organization is to detect API keys and manage modifications mainly for this purpose.
What is most valuable?
The best features GitGuardian Platform offers include wide detection coverage with an accuracy of 100 percent. In very few cases, it results in false positives. It also has a clean dashboard for incident tracking, which are the most valuable features.
Regarding the detection coverage and dashboard features, I find that its most valuable aspect is the detection coverage and real-time alerting capability. GitGuardian Platform can detect a wide range of secrets, including API keys, tokens, passwords, and cloud-related credentials across repositories. The coverage is strong because it supports various types of secrets, not just basic ones. What I find really useful is how fast it detects issues, usually within seconds after a commit, providing real-time alerts. This makes a significant difference in reducing risk. The dashboard is very clean and user-friendly, allowing any department employee to utilize it easily.
GitGuardian Platform combines detection, visibility, and quick response in one workflow, and this is the best aspect.
Since implementing GitGuardian Platform in my organization, I have noted several positive impacts. Before GitGuardian Platform, secret detection was mostly manual and unreliable. In both my previous and current organizations, tracking everything manually was highly impossible. After starting to use GitGuardian Platform, I can summarize the improvements in three points: the risk of credential exposures has significantly reduced, detection has become automated, and SOC and developer teams have saved a lot of time. Additionally, incident response has become faster due to real-time alerts.
What needs improvement?
I have three areas for improvement regarding GitGuardian Platform. One is the incident assignment process, which could be improved. The second would be the implementation of team-based assignments instead of individual ones, which would help significantly. Lastly, some minor false positives still occur, and they could improve that as well. Remediation actions such as key rotations are not handled inside the platform and need to be done externally.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using GitGuardian Platform for the past two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Based on my experience, GitGuardian Platform is very stable, and I have not seen any major downtime issues. The scalability is decent, but managing incidents manually can become slightly challenging as the number of developers increases.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability for GitGuardian Platform in my organization is manageable, but it can be challenging with a larger team.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before using GitGuardian Platform, I was utilizing GitLeaks, which is a free resource. I switched to GitGuardian Platform because it is a significantly better solution compared to GitLeaks, as the limitations of free products are always apparent.
I did not evaluate other options before choosing GitGuardian Platform.
How was the initial setup?
Since GitGuardian Platform is a SaaS product, the basic setup, including integration with GitHub and configuration of alerts, takes around ten to fifteen minutes. Some additional time is spent on fine-tuning alerting and workflows, but overall, the initial setup is very straightforward and fast.
What about the implementation team?
I have a business relationship with this vendor only as a customer; there is no partnership.
What was our ROI?
Regarding the return on investment from using GitGuardian Platform, I can say that it has reduced manual effort, allowed for faster detection within seconds, and decreased the risk of credential leaks, which directly improves security and saves time for both SOC and developer teams.
Since implementing GitGuardian Platform in my organization, I have noted several positive impacts. After starting to use GitGuardian Platform, I can summarize the improvements in three points: the risk of credential exposures has significantly reduced, detection has become automated, and SOC and developer teams have saved a lot of time.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My personal feeling about the pricing of GitGuardian Platform is that it is higher compared to free tools such as GitLeaks. I feel the cost is too high. However, the value from centralized dashboard features, incident management, and integration makes it worthwhile for an enterprise environment. Unfortunately, for a startup such as mine, it is not affordable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
If organizations currently using GitLeaks are considering GitGuardian Platform, I would advise them to switch, as it offers detection along with incident management and integration, making GitGuardian Platform a more complete and suitable solution for enterprise use.
What other advice do I have?
In my previous organizations, my main infrastructure was hosted on Azure and AWS . For GitGuardian Platform in my previous organization, I believe it was a direct purchase from the vendor, not through the AWS Marketplace . I would rate GitGuardian Platform an eight out of ten.