Sold by: Check Point Software Technologies
Deployed on AWS
Check Point WAF as a Service (WAFaaS) is an AI-based web application, generative and agentic AI, and API security solution, delivering the highest protection against known and zero-day threats using advanced AI and IPS. WAFaaS provides multiple layers of protection: rate limiting, AI engines, IPS signatures, zero-day file security, bot protection, and comprehensive API discovery and schema validation. WAFaaS delivers a non-agent WAF, deployable within minutes, and adds advanced DDoS mitigation. Traffic is seamlessly routed through Check Point servers, which automatically issue SSL certificates.
4.4
Overview
Check Point WAF as a Service (WAFaaS) is an automated solution that delivers superior benefits of a top-tier web application, generative and agentic AI, and API security solution, requiring minimal manual intervention. The AI engine continuously learns the behavior of your application, tracking changes throughout its lifecycle. This ensures a minimal false positive rate and reduces tedious rule tuning after each application change. WAFaaS delivers a non-agent WAF that can be deployed in less than 15 minutes. Traffic is effortlessly routed through Check Point servers, which automatically issue SSL certificates. Upon redirection, any HTTP requests are intercepted for inspection and forwarded to the application only after validating their security. WAFaaS is available in premium and advanced packages. Advanced package does not include API Discovery and Zero-day file security.
The Premium package provides:
AI-based engines for prevention of Zero-day Attacks and OWASP Top 10 known attacks.
AI-based contextual analysis engine to ensure precise detection rate with minimal false positives.
Real-time API discovery, sensitive data, and public exposure governance.
Snort 3.0 signature enforcement engine.
Advanced DDoS mitigation to ensure your applications stay accessible to legitimate users by mitigating attacks that overwhelm your network, servers, or applications.
Rate limiting, based on identifiers such as IP address and XFF - limited to 5 rules.
Intrusion Prevention (IPS), over 2,800 Web CVEs, based on award-winning NSS-Certified IPS.
Includes 6 months of full logs retention, based on the fair usage policy.
Auto-generated swagger schema for validation and schema enforcement. Unlimited rate limiting.
Rate limiting functionality adds identifiers such as keys within JWT, cookies, or headers.
Zero-day file security.
You are entitled to free usage of 7 days or 1M HTTP requests whatever comes first, after that you will be billed.
Highlights
- Zero-day prevention: Check Point WAF as a Service (WAFaaS) automatically prevents zero-day exploits across a wide spectrum of security events, including React2Shell, log4shell, text4shell, and MOVEit, all in real-time.
- Deployed within minutes: WAFaaS delivers a non-agent Web application firewall, deployable within minutes. Only a one-time DNS configuration is necessary for WAFaaS to start routing traffic securely to applications in the cloud.
- Unified Application Security Across the Full Attack Surface: Consolidates WAF, API, GenAI, bot, DDoS, file security, and CDN capabilities, eliminating the fragmented point solutions that create blind spots and increase administrative overhead.
Details
Categories
Delivery method
Deployed on AWS
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide
Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Pricing is based on actual usage, with charges varying according to how much you consume. Subscriptions have no end date and may be canceled any time.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
Dimension | Cost/unit |
|---|---|
First 10M HTTP requests | $1,800.00 |
10M-60M HTTP requests (price per 1M) | $44.00 |
60M-160M HTTP requests (price per 1M) | $24.00 |
160M HTTP requests and above (price per 1M) | $16.00 |
Vendor refund policy
No Refunds.
Custom pricing options
Request a private offer to receive a custom quote.
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Support
Vendor support
https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal 24x7 email support with emergency phone number. Premier support available for enterprise customers.
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Similar products
A single pane-of-glass security management console delivers consistent visibility, policy management, logging, reporting and control across all cloud environments and networks
Check Point Check Point Cloud Firewall is a cloud-native security gateway that delivers automated, advanced threat prevention and multi-layered network security for assets that customers migrate to or store on AWS. Try it free for 30 days.
A single security management console delivers consistent visibility, policy management, logging, reporting and control across all cloud environments and networks
Advanced threat prevention security for AWS and hybrid cloud environments, with Threat Extraction and Threat Emulation, and with GWLB (starting with R81.20)
**Please note: To ensure optimal operations, Check Point recommends a 4 vCores machine size. This provides balanced efficiency and smooth performance, which most customers find ideal for their needs.
Advanced threat prevention security for AWS and hybrid cloud environments, with Threat Extraction and Threat Emulation.
**Please note: To ensure optimal operations, Check Point recommends a 4 vCores machine size. This provides balanced efficiency and smooth performance, which most customers find ideal for their needs.
Customer reviews
reviewer2108088
Secure filtering and application control have protected web workloads and simplified deployment
Reviewed on Jul 29, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
Currently, I have no suggestions for Cisco Secure Firewall . I am not working on the next-generation firewall of Cisco. As I already mentioned, I have no suggestions regarding the features and improvements. I am not working on Cisco firewall currently.
For how long have I used the solution?
Overall, I have been working with Cisco Secure Firewall for almost three to four years.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the technical support by Cisco a nine out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
I think the implementation is easy. GUI-based implementation for firewalls is straightforward. Although the command line is a very simple process, next-generation firewalls now come with GUI-based interfaces.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In comparison to other vendors, the pricing is reasonable and affordable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I am currently using some Cisco products. I am currently using some switches of Cisco. I am working on the ASA series. I stopped working with Cisco Firewall more than one to two years ago. I am currently dealing mostly with other Cisco products. I am not dealing with Cisco Secure Access or Cisco Duo . I am working with different product vendors such as Check Point and Fortinet. I am working with Check Point Web Application Firewalls and using bundles with them. I am using some features such as WAF and UTP bundles with application controls, web filtering, email filtering, and DNS filtering and controls that are implemented with UTP enterprise bundles and other WAF applications. I have been dealing with Check Point for three to four years on different products. I am using other platforms and testing some things for the networks. I am also using some other products with them.
What other advice do I have?
I did not have new features or functionalities that I have used recently in Secure Firewall. Check Point WAF is used in my company and my customers are using it. I have seen measurable business and security outcomes since implementation of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) . All vendors design firewalls with application filtering. As per current incident reporting, we implement and update our feature updates and security databases. These databases are updated regularly. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) works fine for every product like Cisco, Check Point, Fortinet, and Palo Alto. I am currently not using Check Point WAF as a primary solution, just for a specific purpose. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is working fine and reports, detects, and stops attacks such as IPS and detection. I would rate Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) a nine out of ten. The existing features are working fine, but new day-to-day attacks and issues arise in the environment globally, dealing with attacks such as phishing and DDoS attacks daily. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) could improve by addressing the new day-to-day attacks and issues that arise in the environment and globally dealing with attacks. I have been satisfied with pricing, technical support, and performance. I am a customer of Check Point. I have been working in this field for several years. My overall review rating for this product is ten.
Babu K
Application security has reduced incidents and now needs UI fixes and shared exception rules
Reviewed on Jul 22, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
We have implemented Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) in our environment. We have been dealing with Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) for three months. We are using Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF ) for our company only.
Currently, we are handling only the L7 part with Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), and we are planning to expand to the APIs and rate-limiting capabilities. We are not handling the network part, as we are only taking care of the security part with Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF).
We have a team of 15 people who handle Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) and other security aspects. We have only two administrators dedicated to Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF).
What is most valuable?
We have seen measurable business and security outcomes since implementation. We have observed reduced incidents with Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF).
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) has helped us reduce our false positives rate. Compared to other WAF solutions, Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is user-friendly and very visible. When we review incidents with Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), it is clearly visible where the block occurred and it shows us detailed overview of the incident. In other products, I am not able to get the exact reason for the block, so I can identify where the block happened, and it is very user-friendly for me to add the policy or explicit policy there.
What needs improvement?
I face issues with the UI part of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), as it malfunctions sometimes. Sometimes I do not see the icons in Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), and whenever I refresh the page, the icons remain invisible.
Additional features I have considered with Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) include the ability to add an exception rule. Since we have multiple projects, I want to add an exception rule to all projects as a shared exception, but when adding it, I am unable to add it individually.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in this field for three years.
How are customer service and support?
When I raise any TAC ticket for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), I am satisfied with their points and their support, as I am receiving immediate responses from the TAC. I can easily rate their support for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) an eight out of ten.
An incident occurred regarding the Global Accelerator movement from CloudFront to Global Accelerator, and for that, it took one week to respond, which was delayed by five days.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We considered the F5 WAF, Edge, and Radware before finally choosing Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF).
How was the initial setup?
Compared to others, it was very easy for us to onboard Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) application.
What about the implementation team?
We received nice support from the OEM for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), so they guided us, and we completed it within a week, onboarding one full project.
What other advice do I have?
The main reason why I chose Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is about the cost, and we have a Check Point firewall and we also use endpoint security and email security, so we wanted to choose this as a one-stop solution.
I do not have an idea regarding Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)'s ability for preemptively blocking zero-day attacks and detecting hidden anomalies, as it has been only three months, so we are yet to explore things in Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF). Currently, we did not check the AI-driven threat detection and prevention capabilities in Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF). Are you referring to the Gen AI or the built-in part of the WAF?
Regarding the built-in AI-driven threat detection and prevention capabilities, I do not see any false positive detection based on the AI part in Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), so everything we are receiving is accurate results only. Based on that learning part, when Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is in learning mode, the learning part is very helpful for us to filter those things, so after moving it to blocking, we are not receiving any false positive alerts or incidents. If I want to add an exception in Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), I can either add it in the shared one or in a local one.
I have given this review an overall rating of 7.5 out of 10.
Ashith S.
Strong Web Traffic Visibility, But a Steep Learning Curve
Reviewed on Jul 17, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Check Point WAF is its clear visibility into web traffic and blocked requests. It makes it easy to identify suspicious activity and fine-tune security policies. Once configured, it provides reliable protection with minimal day-to-day effort.
What do you dislike about the product?
The biggest drawback is the learning curve, especially for first-time users. The interface can feel crowded, and fine-tuning policiesThe initial setup and policy tuning can be time-consuming, especially if you're new to WAFs. The interface isn't always intuitive, and some configuration options require extra effort to understand. takes time to avoid false positives. Some configuration tasks could also be more intuitive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Check Point WAF helps protect our web applications from common attacks while reducing the need for constant manual monitoring. It gives us better visibility into suspicious traffic, allowing us to respond faster and manage security more efficiently.
Samiksha C.
Complex Setup, but Strong Security Features
Reviewed on Jul 15, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
I feel Check Point WAF is very basic but it does its job well in protecting the organization. It definitely helps when an employee is clicking on a suspicious link, like, preventing phishing attacks. I appreciate that it logs everything so that the SOC team stays aware. The feature I love the most is the firewall policy management and log monitoring via the smart console. I regularly work on analyzing the logs to investigate issues and validate security alerts. I also use the threat prevention features like IPS and antivirus to understand patterns and tune rules.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel the setup is very complex and quite lengthy. It also has a high cost, and the performance impact is a bit lagging. It increases latency, reduces throughput, and needs proper sizing and tuning. I request the Check Point team to hopefully make the process easier.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Check Point WAF to protect my organization, detecting endpoint activities and preventing security breaches. It logs everything, keeping our SOC team aware of potential phishing threats and ensuring we don't visit suspicious links.
UTSAV A.
Intuitive and Secure Firewall Solution
Reviewed on Jul 15, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
I find Check Point WAF very easy to use. Even if someone is new to firewall stuff, they can handle it effectively with some guidance on using its GUI. The setup is also quite straightforward; you can set it up in five to ten minutes using the GUI interface, which is quite comfortable for first-timers.
What do you dislike about the product?
As of now, I've used many firewalls, and while Check Point WAF's interface is good, I feel it could be improved a little bit. Compared to Fortinet, their GUI interface is slightly better than Check Point's. That's pretty much the only thing I would say needs improvement, although Check Point does have very good features compared to Palo Alto and ForteGate.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Check Point WAF to secure our environment from vulnerabilities, performing URL and application-level filtering effectively.