Danielle Ruderman (12:35):
As an industry, we're facing a skills gap, so we cannot hire enough cybersecurity professionals to meet the needs of all the different organizations. AWS also, we're all challenged to do that. I think one really interesting thing I learned recently, I went and spoke at my son's school. We have cybersecurity classes, and the teacher asked if I would come in and talk to the classes. And of course, I got there and I spoke to seven different classes, and it was mostly young men.
And I was stunned because I thought that we've done so much work in the tech industry in security to really try to attract that diversity of gender, but most of the classes I was talking to was all boys. And I talked to the teacher afterwards and she said, "Oh, high school's too late. By then you've missed it."
Clarke Rodgers (13:18):
Oh, wow.
Danielle Ruderman (13:18):
Right. She's like, "You've got to start in middle school to get the girls interested." And that really made me wonder, “If this is an issue for our industry that starts in middle school, how do we address that?”
The other thing that's very interesting, if you think about bringing in maybe mid-career professionals, we look at things like, how can we make these roles more appealing to diverse candidates such as those with caregiving responsibilities? I worked with a solutions architecture team a few years ago, and they were struggling even to get women to apply for the job. We know women are out there, we know they have the skills, but they weren't applying to the jobs that were open.
The team did some digging and found that part of the issue was the travel requirements for the role. So, solutions architects tend to travel to customers. This role covered the entire United States — that means there's a lot of travel involved. And when they dug into it, they found that women weren't applying because they can't take that much time away from their responsibilities at home, because even today, disproportionately the responsibility for caregiving falls on the shoulders of women.
So, what they did is they changed the job description and they changed the scope of role to break the country up so that they had a smaller geographic footprint, and that allowed them to get more interest from women. And so again, it was thinking about the challenge differently.
And that's the thing, is people who are affected by these decisions we make, they're not going to raise their hand and tell you what the problem is — you have to go dig in. And so that really taught me that we have to be able to think differently about some of these challenges.
And I think there's some very interesting research that's come out recently. So, Claudia Goldin just won the 2023 Nobel Prize in economics, so she's a Harvard economist, and she's looked at the gender pay gap. And especially this is an issue in tech, right? Why do we have a disparity in pay for women versus men? And what she found is that this is not a skills gap, it's not an education gap, it's not sexism.
Actually, they noticed a dip in women's pay right around the time they have their first child. This goes back to, again, women disproportionately having that caregiver responsibility. When you have caregiver responsibility, you might not be able to take that higher-paying role that has more demands on your time, greater requirements for travel.
That research really resonated with me because of my own experience, because I had to leave a job with very high demands. I was on call because we worked with the blood system. I just couldn't meet that pace, I had a lot of issues with my first child and I had to take a step back in my career. And when I look back on my career trajectory, I had to take a complete turn in what I was doing and that was very hard. And I think it's something we don't talk about enough.
"If we are going to grow the number of women, or diverse candidates in technology and cybersecurity, we've got to be thinking about these issues. How can we help make it easier for people who have these other responsibilities that we're not seeing? Again, they're not going to raise their hand and talk about it, but we have to know that that's there."
Clarke Rodgers (15:59):
We have to ask those questions.
Danielle Ruderman (16:00):
Exactly. And look for ways to make it easier for us to take these roles and have impact in our organizations.
Technology leadership with a humanistic lens
Clarke Rodgers (16:06):
Well, as a leader, I think you're also setting an example. You've recently embarked on, I believe it's a fellowship in humanities and technology. Can you talk a little bit about that and how you think that's going to help your role at AWS?
Danielle Ruderman (16:21):
I had a friend actually forward me an email for a new program that was being stood up at Virginia Tech. And it was all around, they wanted to find some fellows to look at, “How can humanities inform our decisions as leaders in technology?” And I thought, "Oh, my."
And so, I applied to the program, I had to write a paper to apply, I met the founder. And it's a fascinating experiment, I don't think anything like it's been done before. But it's the idea of “How can we learn from that humanistic thinking?”, so how do you think about what is a person? And I think these questions are very important today in the era of generative AI with how we're thinking about the marriage of technology and humanity.
And I don't know that we step back enough to give ourselves time to think that way and think about over the course of human existence, much has been written, much has been said about what it means to be human and exist in this world. And technology adds another dimension, it's another phase of our evolution, if you will, and I think we should be very intentional with how we're using it. And especially as leaders in technology, how we're thinking about reasoning, about the place it has in our lives and how it can make existence better for all of us.
And those are the kind of questions we're noodling on. It's a very powerful experience and I think I have yet to really deeply understand how to bring it to my work, we're still in the early stages. But it's opened up so many channels of thinking. And I will tell you, when I tell people I'm doing this program, they all say, "Can you send me your reading list? I want to know more."
I think there's this untapped need in those of us who work in tech — we get caught up sometimes in I think the technical side of the work. But when you start applying that humanistic thinking and that opportunity to think more deeply about why we do what we do and the impact that it has on the world, people are hungry for that. And I think we need to create space to have those conversations and have conversations at all levels of the organization.
Clarke Rodgers (18:11):
Love it. It sounds like a great course and I hope I can have you back on the show to talk about it in greater depth at another time. Thank you so much for joining me today.
Danielle Ruderman (18:21):
My pleasure.