What's the Difference Between Amazon EMR and EMR Serverless?
Compare Amazon EMR and EMR Serverless side by side — features, pricing, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right product.
Compare side-by-side
|
Comparisons
|
Amazon EMR
|
EMR Serverless
|
|---|---|---|
|
Category
|
Analytics, Big data processing |
Analytics, Serverless Big Data |
|
Description
|
Easily run big data frameworks |
Run big data frameworks like Apache Spark and Hive without configuring or managing clusters. |
|
Best for
|
|
|
|
Key features
|
|
|
|
Pricing model
|
Pay per instance hour + EBS storage |
Pay per vCPU, memory, and storage per second |
|
Free tier
|
No |
No |
|
Expert take
|
“EMR is the go-to for teams already invested in Spark, Hive, or Presto. Amazon EMR Serverless removes cluster sizing decisions entirely; you submit jobs and pay per vCPU-second. For teams that want SQL-only without Spark expertise, Athena or Redshift are simpler paths.” |
“Amazon EMR Serverless runs Spark and Hive jobs without managing clusters. Submit jobs and it provisions the right amount of compute, then releases it when the job completes.” |
|
Product page
|
When to use Amazon EMR or Amazon EMR Serverless
Use Amazon EMR when:
- Big data processing
- Machine learning
- ETL
- Clickstream analysis
- Genomics
Use Amazon EMR Serverless when:
- Serverless Spark
- Serverless Hive
- ETL jobs
- Data transformation
Next steps with AWS for Analytics
AWS product comparisons
Read about AWS products side-by-side
Did you find what you were looking for today?
Let us know so we can improve the quality of the content on our pages