What's the Difference Between Amazon EFS and Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP?
Compare Amazon EFS and Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP side by side — features, pricing, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right product.
Compare side-by-side
|
Comparisons
|
Amazon EFS
|
Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP
|
|---|---|---|
|
Category
|
Storage, File Storage |
Storage, Enterprise File Storage |
|
Description
|
Serverless, fully elastic file storage |
Fully managed NetApp ONTAP file systems with enterprise features |
|
Best for
|
|
|
|
Key features
|
|
|
|
Pricing model
|
Pay per GB stored; no provisioning required |
Pay per GB provisioned + throughput + IOPS |
|
Free tier
|
Yes |
No |
|
Expert take
|
“EFS is the answer when multiple EC2 instances or containers need concurrent read/write access to the same file system. It grows and shrinks automatically, so you never have to provision capacity or worry about running out of space.” |
“Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP provides multi-protocol access (NFS, SMB, iSCSI) with data tiering, cloning, and SnapMirror replication; ideal for migrating NetApp workloads to AWS.” |
|
Product page
|
When to use Amazon EFS or Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP
Use Amazon EFS when:
- Content management
- Web serving
- Home directories
- Machine learning
- Container storage
Use Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP when:
- Enterprise applications
- VMware workloads
- Database storage
- DevOps environments
Next steps with AWS for Storage
AWS product comparisons
Read about AWS products side-by-side
Did you find what you were looking for today?
Let us know so we can improve the quality of the content on our pages