CodeRabbit - AI Code Reviews
CodeRabbitReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
24 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Good PR assistant
What do you like best about the product?
It's pretty good to maintain good code quality and prevent potential bugs, it catches them directly in the PR and even suggest code changes directly, saves tons of time. In case of false positive, you can easily tell it to ignore it next time and it'll keep it in mind for future PRs, same for code style, preferences, etc.. Pretty much anything
What do you dislike about the product?
Although it is pretty good and I'm 99% happy with what it suggests, it can happen that some times some suggestions arent that great or valuable, but this is an AI and it's pretty much to be expected, you can always easily discard them and let it know so it doesn't do it again.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I'm pretty much the only person working on a project and it makes it so I have "someone" else watching over the code I make
CodeRabbit has been consistent and has saved some bad code from going to prod many times
What do you like best about the product?
- easy to use, easy to converse with and interact with
- easy to implement
- easy to implement
What do you dislike about the product?
I wish there was a progress meter or something when it is reviewing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- right now we have a small engineering team, and CodeRabbit gives us the extra security in having PRs reviewed, when we have limited engineers to run reviews currently.
The best assistent for open-source projects
What do you like best about the product?
- It explains analyzed PRs with diagrams and detailed descriptions, which really helps to review them later and make sure that the code does exactly what was expected
- It provides good quality code reviews, detecting bugs, not optimal implementations, missing tests, and suggests improvements
- It learns from feedback and communication with humans and does next reviews better
- It saves PR reviewers a lot of time by checking all the prerequisites.
- It provides good quality code reviews, detecting bugs, not optimal implementations, missing tests, and suggests improvements
- It learns from feedback and communication with humans and does next reviews better
- It saves PR reviewers a lot of time by checking all the prerequisites.
What do you dislike about the product?
- It is unstoppable in its suggestions, providing comments and change requests even to the code, it suggested in previous iterations, so the process can run forever
- It still makes mistakes, and even after I ask to verify the suggestion or the fix, it is going to post, before the posting, it still doesn't do that, so we need to run another iteration of our discussion to verify it and correct if needed.
- It still makes mistakes, and even after I ask to verify the suggestion or the fix, it is going to post, before the posting, it still doesn't do that, so we need to run another iteration of our discussion to verify it and correct if needed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have many PRs from our community and lack of time fro review them by our maintainers of the project. CodeRabbitAI adds PR summary and explains the implementation. Also, it does code review before our maintainers and authors of the PRs can fix found issues even before a maintainer spends time on the review.
Faster turnaround on code review
What do you like best about the product?
The review process has sped up greatly on my team. We less worry about nitpick comments manually and leave the reviewer up to reviewing the PR as a whole.
The automation here is great! Far deeper than I expected it to. Comittable comments are lovely.
The automation here is great! Far deeper than I expected it to. Comittable comments are lovely.
What do you dislike about the product?
Only thing I can find is that there isn't a way to disable code review at an individual repo. I can edit lint rules and other settings. However I have some projects that I just don't care about automation and I would just rather have it skipped altogether.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Smaller team so review is often overlooked or no one has the background to fully review the changeset.
Having someone over my shoulder nitting something that I forgot or just set as a placeholder value is really nice.
Having someone over my shoulder nitting something that I forgot or just set as a placeholder value is really nice.
Used in personal and company repo works like butter
What do you like best about the product?
Its easy to review prs with the help of ai summaries make the tasks abit simpler for me to review prs of anyone
What do you dislike about the product?
sometimes it pauses the auto reviews which we need to trigger manually soo yeah
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows us to easily review the pull requests.
Easy to use, no effort setup, actually adds value
What do you like best about the product?
I've been using code rabbit since the old days when it just used to be a GitHub action. Now it's a one step install GitHub app and it's become even more convenient.
Although I miss self hosting it, infact I still do a patched GitHub app from the old GitHub action, I can't sent that coderabbit has been awesome in adding new features and quality prompts/prompting techniques.
It really feels like the PR Review is there to help you, not just to say oh we got this cool this done by AI.
Although I miss self hosting it, infact I still do a patched GitHub app from the old GitHub action, I can't sent that coderabbit has been awesome in adding new features and quality prompts/prompting techniques.
It really feels like the PR Review is there to help you, not just to say oh we got this cool this done by AI.
What do you dislike about the product?
I understand that it requires funds to run an org, but yeah, it's sad that coderabbit isn't mit or gpl anymore, though it's not that hard to make a GH app out of thier old GitHub actions, but I'd still recommend using their services since they improve so much so frequently.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
PR Review is a big bottleneck, often people that do it are a valuable resource for any org, and thier time could be well spent not worrying about low hanging fruits. This helps them not get overwhelmed and helps even someone that doesn't have much idea about the PR, get context and summary on it really fast and then walk through the code change hunks.
Huge amounts of potential
What do you like best about the product?
Surprisingly, CodeRabbit's PR summaries, auto generated diagrams and table providing an overview of changes in each file ended up being one of the most helpful things for our team. This was especially true in complicated PRs but also helped when team members reviewed code from projects they weren't as familiar with.
What do you dislike about the product?
For a larger team, we found that sometimes CodeRabbit's PR feedback was a bit too much and added to the noise of PR reviews, even when set to a lower frequency setting. For some projects, this detail was more useful (e.g. front end web) and for others less so (e.g. back end).
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
PRs are overwhelming in bigger teams, CodeRabbit provides a second pair of eyes which can help with a first pass over code. Their summaries and diagrams help speed up our team getting across the code changes faster as they get context on the change before seeing the code itself.
Great assistant for solo projects
What do you like best about the product?
When working on a project as a solo contributor, CodeRabbit gives you a "second set of eyes" to verify your work, and check for things as simple as spelling mistakes, to proper error handling, interface definition, and more. I especially appreciate how the github integration works seamlessly, allowing me to spend more time focusing on solving problems, and less time on tooling. It suggests test suites, which is wonderful for devs who don't have the capacity to write a thorough set of e2e tests from scratch. Best feature has to be that it's free for open-source projects, so I am able to deliver higher-quality code without taking on a financial burden. Finally, it also adjusts to feedback, so if it suggests something incorrect, you can refine its behaviour by responding with natural language.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some of the recommendations are nonsensical or just plain incorrect. At times, the suggested code changes result in a broken state. Overall, it's not a code author, so you cannot treat it as one - engage in a review process with it as if it were a junior developer who has a lot of knoweldge, but little practical experience, and you will probably find it of some use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am a solo maintainer of an open-source project, and code rabbit gives me confidence in merging my PRs without having another human to check on the state of the code.
No brainer plug and play review companion
What do you like best about the product?
I use CodeRabbit daily on my pull requests, as I am a solo maintainer on an open source project, CodeRabbit is the dev companion I was missing.
It is probably one of the most easiest tool to setup out there. You just link it to your Github repo and you are good to go.
It has an active community on Discord. We see that the CodeRabbit team value their user's feedback.
It is probably one of the most easiest tool to setup out there. You just link it to your Github repo and you are good to go.
It has an active community on Discord. We see that the CodeRabbit team value their user's feedback.
What do you dislike about the product?
Downsides are related to the LLM limitations such as context window. So CodeRabbit won't work on huge pull requests.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
CodeRabbit helps me making sure I am not pushing a critical regression or a dumb bug in production. It also helps me write better, maintainable code.
Like having an on-call dev for code reviews!
What do you like best about the product?
CodeRabbit enables me to build confidently knowing that I will get feedback on my code no matter who is around or what dev availability looks like. The generated descriptions and diagrams act as a running source of documentation that saves time when trying to build quickly!
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing that comes to mind!
Feature request: Auto-generated documentation outside of PRs
Feature request: Auto-generated documentation outside of PRs
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
CodeRabbit helps me gather feedback on large chunks of code that my team is working quickly to develop. It helps us catch performance optimization opportunities without slowing us down.
showing 1 - 10