External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
I wanted to like them, but poor security
The product idea is great and I was looking forward to working with them, but the IAM permissions they require are far too permissive and they wouldn't work with me to come up with a least-privilege permission set. They are violating the AWS Well Architected Framework recommendations. They want you to add the ReadOnlyAccess policy (which is too permissive) and then add explicit Denies to counteract the permissiveness. This is not a good approach as ReadOnlyAccess is managed by AWS and changes occasionally as new products and features are released. If you don't actively monitor this, you will end up inadvertently give nOps too much access to your accounts. nOps should fix this by issuing an IAM policy that has explicit grants for all the permissions it needs rather. This is necessary in order to be taken seriously given how much access nOps needs on an account.
Feature Rich Product
Some of the features:
* Buying and selling of reserved instances (Windows/Linux/RDS)
* Cost reports
* Chargebacks
* nOps Rules backed by controls based on the AWS Well-Architected framework.
~ Update
More of the same. The product could be relaly great, but it is riddled with bugs and not mcommunicated changes to existing features which change operational use.
Their support is also lacking and the responses will seem AI generated.