In the healthcare sector, my use case involves securing privileged accounts across the entire organization. Although this is not specific to any sector, I also work for banking and financial services. As a PAM solution, I secure privileged accounts while provisioning access.

With nine plus years of experience, I can develop and suggest solutions for various infrastructures, install, build, onboard, upgrade, patch, reboot, and maintain backup and restore solutions, as well as handle disaster recovery activities. I address troubleshooting of infrastructure issues and end-user requests, effectively managing onboarding and deboarding, and access provisioning for end-users. This allows me to provide end-to-end support in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's best features include password rotation and an excellent monitoring solution, with the additional benefit of monitoring for Enterprise Password Management (EPM) where I provision privileged access.

Delving deeper into the solution reveals many valuable features, but I particularly find password rotation and monitoring capabilities highly effective for auditing purposes. These features restrict users from unauthorized communications outside of CyberArk.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has helped reduce privileged accounts in my healthcare organization, where I generate reports for approximately 500,000 accounts. This reporting capability allows me to analyze and restrict based on the reports tab effectively. I note that there are limitations with supporting the pass reporter feature, although I still find it valuable for generating comprehensive account and safe level reports.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager assists in meeting compliance and regulatory requirements such as HIPAA and SOX, ensuring I adhere to necessary standards in my operations.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has room for improvement regarding notifications for service account password rotations. Currently, notifications are sent at the platform level rather than at the account or safe level. I suggest enabling notifications at lower levels to help users and application owners easily identify which specific accounts are due for password rotation.

This would alleviate confusion among multiple application accounts on the platform.

With CyberArk Privileged Access Manager implemented in the healthcare industry, I observe benefits in efficient password rotation for individual and generic accounts. However, there are challenges with service account password rotation. Application teams often do not adhere to standards for rotating service account passwords, fearing failure in their jobs. While the feature exists, the delay in updates can lead to reluctance among teams to use it effectively. This reveals a need for better integration at the application level for immediate password updates.

Regarding my relationship with the vendor, I am currently a customer. Previously, I was a partner while working in the banking and financial sector, but now in healthcare solutions, I associate as a customer. I reach out to the vendor whenever I encounter issues, seek information, or require assistance with upgrades. I maintain consistent communication on a weekly or biweekly basis through calls, emails, or tickets.

I rate CyberArk's technical support as an eight. The vendor provides solid support when needed.

In comparison to other PAM solutions like Delinea and BeyondTrust, I find CyberArk Privileged Access Manager continues to lead in effectiveness. With over nine years of experience, I believe CyberArk is superior in its password rotation capabilities and overall management, despite competitors having similar functionalities under different names.

I recommend CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to small and mid-level organizations needing a PAM solution. I assert that it has been a reliable tool for me for over nine years. Even a proof of concept might be beneficial initially, with an emphasis on understanding the budget aspect. I would rate this product a nine overall.

I find CyberArk to be expensive in general. Many organizations have considered alternatives due to budget constraints, even though CyberArk is a leading product in the PAM industry, recognized for its quality and long-standing presence. However, the high cost can drive some customers away.

Integrating CyberArk Privileged Access Manager with existing EHR systems and healthcare workflows, such as SailPoint, presents challenges. SailPoint integration often hinges on third-party tools, making the process complicated and critical for many organizations. I endeavor to manage this necessity.

In terms of mean time to respond, I acknowledge variable response time. The L1 team is proactive, yet the vendor often pushes to close incidents swiftly, even when issues remain unresolved. This can extend the resolution timeline significantly.

When assessing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for protecting against ransomware attacks, I find that it effectively isolates components such as the primary vault, DR vault, PVWA, CPM, PSM, and PSMP, ensuring communication is limited to internal only. This isolation prevents any interaction with the external world, including AD, thereby safeguarding my systems. The feature of maintaining a DMZ for the vault, which ensures that attackers cannot reach it, is critical in protecting against ransomware threats targeting Active Directory.

Every infrastructure requires maintenance, including upkeep and patching. I find managing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's infrastructure is straightforward. It can run effectively in physical or virtual environments, whether on cloud machines or VMware systems. Overall, maintenance is not overly complex.

If deploying in a lab environment, setting up the primary and DR vaults, PVWA, and CPM can usually be completed within one and a half to two hours. Organization-wide implementations may require more time due to necessary approvals and hardware availability, but the actual installation process itself remains swift.

I assess the granular controls provided by CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as robust because they enable tailored access at the individual user level or through AD groups. This includes detailed role definitions such as safe reader, safe auditor, safe approver, and safe manager. As an administrator, I can manage all access. By provisioning least privileged access and allowing users to connect and view their accounts without exposing passwords, I uphold the principle of least privilege at the safe level.

My use case for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is that I work as an administrator where I can configure and integrate all those CyberArk Privileged Access Manager components such as PSM, CPM, hardening the CPMs, checking the services of the PVWA and Vaults, and making sure everything is operational. I am responsible for creating safes and managing the accounts. I onboard the accounts on the platform based on their vendor requirement.

We also provide the SIEM integration to check the logs and we are responsible for Splunk integration too, but it is not related to CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. We actually implement all those application logs to Splunk for the dashboard monitoring and the alert-based system through ITSI.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has improved how my organization functions as we have 24 PSM servers, four CPM servers, one primary Vault, and one DR Vault. We are in the process of upgrading from version 11.3 to 14.6 and maybe next month, we are going to update our servers.

The best features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager include that it is normally used for securing passwords because nowadays, most of the breaches happen due to leaking passwords. So we actually manage the passwords in a secured way. In a Vault, there is end-to-end security, with seven layers of security that we are maintaining. That is called session encryption, firewalls, authentication, authorization, and auditing. At the end of the day, we are doing the file encryption. Through this, we are actually managing the passwords in a very secure way. We can explain this architecture to the vendor to convince them to come to CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

What I appreciate about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is that it is not only for password security; we can also manage their applications and platforms. Each and every thing, whenever a user is coming to CyberArk Privileged Access Manager or logging in to CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, end-to-end protection will be handled by CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. Whenever they connect to their target servers, each and every thing will be monitored and reviewed by CyberArk Privileged Access Manager administrators such as us. We see whatever incidents happen and whatever is going to happen. Whatever the user does from the target system, we can monitor everything through the PSM servers. We also have PTA, Privileged Threat Analysis. Whenever a user is doing unwanted things such as running unwanted scripts in their target system, the PTA incident automatically closes their target system. For example, if a user is working beyond their scope and is running some scripts, it will show that and raise an incident. We get the tickets and we can monitor it and have a call with the user. We are giving end-to-end security from the user to the platform level.

In CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, I see room for improvement as I am working in the on-premises networks, and now we are also having the cloud-based PAM. So there, everything is maintained by the CyberArk Privileged Access Manager team, and we are only maintaining the PSM servers. So it is already upgraded from the on-premises network to the cloud network. If you ask me what we can implement beyond that, I just need a few minutes to think about what new things, because it is already an end-to-end security on-premises itself. Now, when it comes to PCloud, Privileged Cloud, it is more secure than the on-premises networks because most of the things are handled using the cloud itself. So it is an already upgraded version; we do not need to implement something new. But if you think in that way, we can have a chance to implement our things.

If anything could be improved in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, I think we could build a small agent AI in my team, we could give access to these logs—the Vault logs, PSM logs, and CPM logs. Whenever the system is going down, the AI will automatically check. If we actually implement agent AI in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it will check the logs, and if any errors are coming, it automatically triggers alerts and gives the solution. That is the best improvement I can think of because these days, most things are done by agent AI. So if we also implement this agent AI in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, we can add more features.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for around three years. I have exactly three years of experience with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

I would rate the stability of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as an eight.

I will rate the scalability of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as a ten, indicating it is a scalable solution.

I rate the technical support for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as the main thing in any environment. It can be a production environment such as CyberArk Privileged Access Manager or any production environment with any project. Because of technical support, we have continuous deployment and continuous monitoring. Whenever they are doing their work best, and at that time, when something is going down, they are the first point of contact to check what the issue is. After that, it will come to the developers to check that issue. So I will rate the monitoring team, the operations team, a ten.

I have used other PAM solutions, and I find that when it comes to CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it is a company that has a long history of trust with users and vendors, which provides a more secure way of doing things for their platforms and their work. So in my opinion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the best solution we can give to vendors for PAM solutions.

The time it takes to deploy CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is actually based on the architecture of their requirement, such as the number of users, accounts, and the platforms they are onboarding into CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. If it is less than ten users and four platforms, it will take one or two days. If the communication between our servers and the platforms is already good, it will normally take one to two days. If their requirement is more, such as at the platform level where they have both Windows and Linux operating systems and database operating systems and they want to segregate multiple users based on their OS, at that time we just need some time to create the SOPs and we have to proceed based on that requirement.

My team works with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, and we have 12 members.

My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four types of pricing. Based on their requirement, we will actually propose the pricing to the vendor. If their platforms and accounts are fewer, we can go for the minimal requirement of a PAM solution. And if they want more upgraded servers in their system, we can go for the maximum pricing.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager solution requires maintenance, and definitely, we are actually doing rotations 24/7 to make sure every system is active 24/7 so a user will not get interrupted when accessing their platforms.

My clients use CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for around 12,000 accounts.

The vendor can contact me if they have any questions or comments about my review.

I'm interested in being a reference for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

I definitely recommend CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to other users because it gives more security to their platforms and users to store their passwords and provides end-to-end security. If they do not want to breach their platforms, I would recommend CyberArk Privileged Access Manager 100 to 200 percent to keep it secure. My overall rating for this product is a ten.

We are working with CyberArk solutions such as PAM on-premises. We are working with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, including AIM, PSM, and PSMP components.

The ability of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to safeguard financial service infrastructure is important; without it, banking and financial clients cannot secure their operations. Despite various attacks affecting other companies, CyberArk's implementations ensured that we remained unaffected.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has been helpful in managing over 125,000 privileged accounts in a single environment for our client, and we have multiple CyberArk environments for different clients with different numbers of accounts. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is excellent at helping companies meet regulatory requirements due to its ability to cater to the specific needs of clients across different countries, ensuring compliance without data transfer issues.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager provides security and video recording of user sessions for audit purposes. This feature is critical in financial sectors where auditing who performed specific actions is essential. Having video records adds a layer of proof and ensures compliance with audit requirements.

The key feature of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is that it's a comprehensive package rather than just dependent on components such as Vault or Privileged Session Manager. Each component is necessary, and the Vault is the heart of CyberArk; everything connects via PSM and PSMP. I particularly appreciate PSM and PSMP because they simplify troubleshooting and charging.

A potential area for improvement is enhancing support for cluster environments and distributed Vaults. Clients in multiple countries that need central access have different challenges that require better solutions from CyberArk.

For financial services, CyberArk can improve incident response by ensuring fast support for critical priority tickets to meet compliance requirements. Providing more documentation on CyberArk is recommended for new team members to enhance their troubleshooting capabilities. I understand it's up to the client, but 99% fail to change the demo key, so it's crucial for CyberArk to emphasize changing the key and documenting it as part of the installation process.

I have been working with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for more than nine years.

For stability, I would rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager a nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as a nine.

Regarding technical support from CyberArk, while L2 and L3 teams are effective, L1 support requires improvement due to longer response times in critical situations. Coordination with higher support levels sometimes takes longer than expected, which should be addressed.

After implementing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it typically takes about four to five months for a company to realize time to value, assuming they have a strong implementation team and infrastructure in place.

Integrating CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is very simple due to the provided connectors for Windows and UNIX, as well as plugins for databases. Custom integrations may take longer, around one month, due to development requirements.

Regarding costs, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is not a cheap product; hence, many companies struggle with its high licensing cost. While it's valuable, it comes with a high price tag, making it hard for every company to afford it.

After comparing with other products, I find that no other product currently matches CyberArk's performance; the performance issues in alternative solutions make them less desirable. While there are competitors, I cannot definitively name one that compares with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

The requirements for CyberArk, particularly in India, have evolved significantly since the company acquired several businesses in 2014. Every organization needs an identity and access management (IAM) and privileged access management (PAM) solution. CyberArk stands out as the leading product in this category. While there are other protocols available in the market, CyberArk is known for its security, reliability, and user-friendly access.

In my experience working with multiple companies and clients using CyberArk, I have not encountered any cases of breaches or malicious activity associated with the platform. This track record provides a strong sense of security and assurance regarding CyberArk’s capabilities. Although the privileged access management solution can be costly, it offers extensive security features, including multi-factor authentication (MFA). Overall, CyberArk is an excellent product for organizations seeking robust security solutions.

Regarding granularity of PAM controls in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it means having centralized control in the Vault. Standalone CyberArk Vaults perform best compared to cluster systems, which present challenges during maintenance or network connectivity issues.

Overall, I would rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager a nine out of ten.

We use CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for least privilege and accountability purposes, while we also utilize the EPM solution for endpoint protection. Additionally, PTA is one of the most important tools from CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, which we use on a real-time protection basis. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager effectively prevents attacks on the financial service infrastructure, as we protect against lateral movement, credential stuffing, and since no passwords are available because they are rotated through CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, we can isolate every session and record all activity while monitoring in real-time.

The ability of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to safeguard the financial services infrastructure by protecting credentials is extremely important, as every activity in a financial organization needs to be recorded for accountability in auditing. Therefore, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a crucial tool, and we utilize credential rotation as 85% of successful attacks in the last 10 years have been initiated through credential theft. Monitoring, recording, and credential rotating activities are crucial because if CyberArk Privileged Access Manager goes out of service, the total environment would collapse due to the lack of passwords for respective servers.

While I cannot suggest major changes, I did encounter a vulnerability concerning RADIUS blasts, which was recently mitigated by CyberArk Privileged Access Manager in their latest version, indicating an area for improvement in vulnerability assessments. Improvements in vulnerability assessment are essential. A notable request I have regarding CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is to address the issues of database corruption identified in cluster environments experienced by multiple clients.

From 2021 to now, I have been working on CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

I have not experienced any stability issues with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

It is easy to scale.

In terms of technical support, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has provided excellent support without any doubt. Based on the issue resolution and support quality, I rate the support 10 out of 10.

Before using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, I did not evaluate any other PAM tools.

Setting up CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is not complex, especially if you properly follow the recommendations from CyberArk.

I handled the deployment myself.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has been very effective in helping my company meet compliance and regulatory requirements. Implementing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager saved time on compliance requirements in finance, typically around one hour.

There has been no reduced cost associated with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, as when it is required, you must pay for their licensing and prepare the full environment. While there are costs for the licensing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it definitely provides value when I need any accountability or session recording.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is one of the most important components from CyberArk, along with EPM (Endpoint Privilege Manager) and PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics tool). I recommend anyone considering CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to view it as a friendly environment, as it stands out among the other PAM solutions I have encountered. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is highly recommended for its user-friendly nature. I rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager a ten out of ten.

For CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, use cases are providing just-in-time privileged access. The most simple use case is hosting all privileged credentials in a secure manner and managing and controlling access to those credentials. Therefore, controlling access to privileged endpoints is the usual thing that will be done with PAM.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has several valuable features. The basic feature is privileged access management with all the processes and procedures that are needed. It has all the relevant features required to provide a PAM project or PAM program. It does everything that is needed. A tangible benefit is that we already have full control of privileged access. We have just started and have onboarded all privileged accounts into the system.

I have noticed areas of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager that could be improved or enhanced in integration with automation tools. It's not quite the same in the cloud, the Privilege Cloud version. The on-premises version allows users to do absolutely everything. When they took it to the cloud, they started cutting things out. The other issue with CyberArk is that they are marketing their new product, SIA, which is based on Privilege Cloud. Users still need to have Privilege Cloud to achieve the same level of functionality as the on-premises version.

We are still early in the roadmap and haven't progressed far enough to identify additional needs. When organizations reach the end of their maturity roadmap, they can better identify specific tool requirements that aren't currently available.

We have been deploying CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for two years now and counting.

The evaluation of customer service and technical support for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depends on several factors. When receiving support directly from CyberArk, they are the most knowledgeable, though they don't always have immediate solutions as they might need to create them, which can take considerable time. For instance, the Ansible integration for the cloud version has been requested for years.

When working with CyberArk partners for support, it's crucial to ensure they have actual knowledge and aren't just acting as middlemen. There have been instances where third parties are hired to provide first and second line support, but they simply forward requests to CyberArk without adding value to the process.

We used a deployment partner recommended by CyberArk for the deployment and maintenance process. One crucial step that should be done first is creating an inventory of how privileged access is currently handled and where it is needed. Without this inventory, you might deploy CyberArk and realize it doesn't work with your existing architecture or infrastructure.

Our implementation team consisted of approximately 15 people, including architects, engineers, application owners, network specialists, Windows and Linux administrators, database administrators, and cloud specialists. While maintenance requires fewer people, input from all these stakeholders is crucial for successful implementation as they each have different requirements.

Most importantly, this needs to be a management-driven initiative with a top-down approach. Management must establish new working methods, as the biggest barrier to acceptance is typically resistance to changes in working procedures.

For ongoing operations, the staffing requirements depend on the company's operations. Typically, 24/7 coverage requires at least three people per shift in a follow-the-sun model. This accounts for first and second line support only, with additional staff needed for server maintenance, totaling around nine people.

The primary problem addressed by implementing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the lack of control over privileged access - where it happens, how it occurs, and what is done with that access. When attempting to attack an enterprise, attackers target the highest-privilege credentials available. Therefore, protecting the most critical credentials within your organization is essential.

For those planning to deploy CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it's crucial to understand that it's a multi-year program. It's not just about deploying the tool; it needs policies and governance around it. Additionally, infrastructure modifications are necessary to ensure PAM is the only way to provide privileged access to endpoints.

It's a great product that does everything required from a PAM tool. I would rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as a nine out of ten.

My main use case for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is installing it to prevent direct access to the users. For the privileged account, we are using the PAM, and all sessions have been monitored, with all logs shared and logged on the vault.

I have more to add about my main use case for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, specifically our Privileged Threat Analysis, which detects any suspicious event and alarms us.

The best features CyberArk Privileged Access Manager offers are PTA, Privileged Threat Analysis, and Alero, Remote Access Management, and these features are essential for enhancing security.

PTA and Alero have made a difference for my team by providing a predefined rule assigned and implemented on the PAM; for example, it sends us an email if there is any suspicious activity or threat credential loss, offering feedback related to user behavior. For Alero, Remote Access Management, it is a very wonderful Identity and Access Management with biometric MFA, mobile access, location tracking, and a small RBAC role-based matrix access that defines user roles, serving as a replacement for VPN.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has positively impacted my organization, showing significant improvement since all sessions are monitored and isolated using isolated RDP sessions, which are created temporarily and expire if not used.

In terms of specific metrics or outcomes, the time savings have been noticeable, and while it is not direct access, the PAM works efficiently between servers and end users, preventing users from running or installing unauthorized applications through the AppLocker application created on the PSM.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager can be improved because I have experienced one issue where a user connected through RDP to a Linux server and the PAM could not fetch any commands or key store logging from the Linux server, which works fine on Windows servers. If they could combine both into one keylogger solution, it would be great, and increasing the number of CPM plugins for password retention while providing common web portal applications out-of-the-box would also help.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for more than five years.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable in my experience, with no issues of downtime or reliability due to our disaster recovery (DR) and high availability (HA) servers in place.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's scalability is good, as it can handle more users or workloads with our five-year roadmap indicating that the PSM server can manage around 20 sessions per hour, which is sufficient for our organization.

I would rate customer support a nine on a scale.

I previously used BeyondTrust and Delinea, but I did not switch because I noticed many features in CyberArk that are not available in other solutions.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, as I had good experience with another live product.

My advice for others looking to use CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is to pay attention to the vaulting part, which is essential for every organization, as each server has a secured vault that connects over TLS with a lot of encryption details. The product is consistently enhanced, and the latest release is 14.6. I rate this solution 9 out of 10.

The use cases for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager include access to Windows, Windows servers, Linux servers, firewalls, clouds, GCP, AWS, and Azure, but I do not administer the clouds. I only administer CyberArk.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager helps us maintain an inventory of our privileged credentials and manage password rotation easily for our organization. It provides a secure way to access and monitor.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has positively impacted visibility into the PAM accounts. It has a very good dashboard that provides visibility into our accounts and password information.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's abilities to safeguard the infrastructure are important, as protecting credentials provides us with security and visibility.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is effective for preventing attacks and threats. It's very effective since it connects to a SIEM, such as Splunk and ArcSight. The functionality called PTA, Privileged Threat Analytics, is very good.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager integrates well with other products.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager improves operations because it's all centralized. When you have CyberArk to gain access to the admin console and other applications, it's the easiest way to configure your firewall rule because everything comes from CyberArk.

It's user-friendly and very configurable. We can do many things with it, especially with password management. It's easy to manage, and the controls are straightforward. It's a specialized solution for which it's hard to find professionals to work with, but it's very effective.

It's a very good solution for data privacy.

The reports could be more editable. I want to be able to edit a dashboard to see other information or graphics. Making the reports more editable would be beneficial.

I've been using this solution for at least five years.

I would evaluate the customer service and technical support of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as very good.

I worked with Senhasegura, which is a Brazilian application for password security. We switched to CyberArk Privileged Access Manager because it is recommended for larger environments.

The initial setup is easy. I was involved in the setup process and was part of it.

It takes six months for the full implementation in a big company.

The deployment team consisted of approximately 10 people. While I don't know the exact job titles, a manager and at least two engineers on the CyberArk team were required.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has helped our organization save on costs. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is expensive, but it helps protect us from losing money.

Its benefits are visible immediately after the deployment, but in Brazil, people generally implement CyberArk Privileged Access Manager after an incident.

It's not a cheap application. It's very expensive.

Don't wait to be attacked or lose your data. Protect your credentials, even if you use other security tools.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.