I have used IBM SPSS Statistics primarily for survey analysis. It did what was necessary, including crosstabs, correlation, regression, chi-squared, and similar analyses that you see in published papers. These are the types of analyses I have used it for in my research.
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SoftwareReviews from AWS customer
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Good Analytics tool at market
drag and drop option increases time efficiency.
changing and using algorithm and seeing result is good.
easy implementation for recurring datas.
customer care is topnotch
can incorperate additional algorithms.
Best analytic tool
one stop solution for statistic analytics and visualization.
All-in Package for statistical analysis
It is a good analytic tool for simple and light dataset
can get an overview of our data Quickly.
Automation is good and scaleable.
Drag and drop method enables for easy implemenation.
Customer support is excellent.
Cost is too high compared to features.
By improving the efficienty for larger and complex dataset can improve the number of frequency of usage
SPSS : A Vital Tool in Market & Social Research
IBM SPSS: A User-Friendly Tool for Powerful Data Analysis
Limited Customization
Slow Performance with Large Datasets
Limited Advanced Visualization
Dependency on Syntax for Advanced Features
Efficient Statistical Analysis
Streamlined Reporting
Good for correlation, regression, and chi-squared analyses
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Using IBM SPSS Statistics allowed me to conduct necessary survey analyses for research, including cross-tabs, correlation, regression, and chi-squared analyses, which are often utilized in published papers.
What is most valuable?
IBM SPSS Statistics is good for obtaining necessary results like cross tabs, correlation, regression, and chi-squared analyses. It is perfectly adequate if all you need are the results and not the trail of evidence.
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used IBM SPSS Statistics for several decades, over 40 years or more.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
IBM SPSS Statistics has been pretty reliable for many years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
IBM SPSS Statistics is widely used in universities or organizations with a budget for it, so scalability issues are more about financial constraints than technical ones.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Recently, I have moved away from IBM SPSS Statistics and have been using KNIME instead. It's easier, particularly for students. I've been using R alongside KNIME as well.
How was the initial setup?
I did not have to do the initial setup for IBM SPSS Statistics since it was managed by the university.
What about the implementation team?
The university's tech team handled the implementation and setup for IBM SPSS Statistics.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of IBM SPSS Statistics is managed by organizations, not individual researchers. It is a very expensive product, despite being good.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Besides IBM SPSS Statistics, I have used KNIME and recently started using R, which is free of charge and more powerful but cumbersome. RStudio is its front end, making it useful to scientists.
What other advice do I have?
While IBM SPSS Statistics is a good product, it is very expensive and might be a better fit for those with a sufficient budget. KNIME provides a desktop version free of charge, which helps users get started.
It's usage benifits and drawbacks
It literally take 5-6 hours to process 1 lakh raws of data
Data modification
Charts and reports prepration
Data analysis