My main use case for Veset Nimbus is using it for OTT TV channels to change the format of the content. I also use it for the subtitles for the content.
Cloud workflow has improved multi-format OTT delivery and streamlined subtitles management
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I am Ravindra Arakati, working for IAMGEN as the Data Analyst Manager in the SaaS platform. Veset Nimbus is mainly used for broadcast OTT TV channels. It handles everything, from multi-format delivery, captions, and subtitles, to secondary events. The main key features are that it is cloud-based with intuitive graphics, delivery, and audio quality. It has all these features, and also recent enhancements such as the Dolby audio system and UI speed stability.
Regarding limitations, I believe there is room for growth in how Veset Nimbus can be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
In the recent past, I have been using Veset Nimbus.
What other advice do I have?
Based on my experience, I would rate Veset Nimbus between seven and eight. I choose that number because I need to use it more and more to gain a more comprehensive understanding, which will allow me to provide a more accurate rating.
I can encourage others to use Veset Nimbus as advice for those looking into using it. I find this interview to be very valuable. I do not believe anything should change for the future. My overall review rating for Veset Nimbus is eight.
showing 1 - 1