Control-M SaaS
BMC SoftwareReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
132 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Best views for complex data
What do you like best about the product?
The reporting and forecasting abilities.
What do you dislike about the product?
The loss of what services a specific job belongs to from a historical view.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Accurate predictions of end times for critical services.
Centralized Automation with Room for UI Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
I love how Control-M centralizes and automates complex batch processes, significantly reducing manual effort and minimizing the risk of human error. The centralized dashboard is particularly impressive as it allows me to see every job, dependency, and workflow in real-time. This feature lets me immediately view job statuses, dependencies, and potential bottlenecks without the need to dig through multiple screens, making it extremely efficient and user-friendly. Additionally, the tool integrates seamlessly with monitoring tools like Splunk and CloudWatch for tracking logs and alerts, and with ticketing systems such as ServiceNow or Jira for incident management and workflow tracking, ensuring a smooth operational workflow. The initial setup was straightforward, and the visual tools made defining workflows easier once the core setup was established. The comprehensive documentation is also a big help for getting started, although there is a learning curve. Overall, based on my experience, I confidently give Control-M a recommendation score of 10 out of 10.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some areas of the Control-M interface still feel outdated and could benefit from a more modern, streamlined design. The visual layout can become crowded, especially when navigating large workflow maps. This makes improved zooming, grouping, or filtering options a desirable enhancement. Additionally, while the installation process was straightforward, configuring the environment, agents, security settings, and integrations required planning and technical knowledge. The documentation was helpful, but there remains a learning curve for new users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I find Control-M helps by centralizing and automating complex batch processes, reducing manual effort and human error. The dashboard offers real-time overview, making it easy to track job statuses and workflows.
Effortless Workflow Automation and Seamless CI/CD Integration
What do you like best about the product?
Control-M lets us design workflows as code and keep everything in Git. It fits well with CI/CD, so job changes can be tested and deployed just like application updates. This makes our automations more consistent and easier to maintain.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some advanced options take a while to learn, and creating new integrations often requires coordination with other teams. When multiple groups add jobs without a structure, the workspace can feel cluttered and harder to search through.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It gives us one place to create and manage automations, keeps tasks running in the right order, and reduces manual fixes. This makes our processes more stable and easier to maintain.
Effective Job Scheduling with Debugging Ease, But Slow Performance
What do you like best about the product?
I find Control-M incredibly helpful for job scheduling as it simplifies the process of scheduling tasks. The feature I appreciate the most is the ability to track failures and access debug logs, which are essential for troubleshooting. Whenever a job fails, I can quickly check the debug logs to instantly identify and solve problems, making the troubleshooting process much more efficient. This capability of Control-M adds significant value by ensuring that any issues can be resolved swiftly without prolonged disruptions.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find Control-M to be slow at times, which can be frustrating and potentially impact my productivity. Additionally, the software feels like it's based on legacy systems, which might suggest that it lacks some modern features or user-friendly interfaces that newer software options could offer.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Control-M for easy job scheduling, tracking failures, and debugging logs, which simplifies troubleshooting processes.
Streamlines Automation, Needs UI Modernization
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate the user interface of Control-M, as it is both simple and effective. It features a design that is basic and decluttered, yet it resembles a control room dashboard, offering both simplicity and depth. This combination is refreshing and provides a lot of functional detail while remaining highly customizable. Control-M maintains a user-friendly approach that keeps things straightforward without sacrificing complexity for those who need to dive deeper. Additionally, the ability to visually arrange workflows through drag-and-drop is incredibly useful, allowing for easy adjustments and amendments as needed. The inclusion of analytics graphics, like pie charts, is also a significant advantage, making it easy to comprehend data at a glance. This is particularly beneficial for management, providing well-presented, good data that can be extracted seamlessly.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the visual design of Control-M to be very dated due to the inability to change the color scheme easily. The current colors appear somewhat childish and reminiscent of an old-fashioned PowerPoint presentation. It would be beneficial if the software allowed for customization in alignment with our core branding to avoid having to modify the graphics through another tool post-generation.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Control-M to automate database processes, ensuring consistency and freeing up my team to focus on other tasks. It standardizes operations, reduces manual oversight, and simplifies complex workflows, allowing us to maintain operational efficiency without variation.
Centralized Task Management with Proactive Alerts
What do you like best about the product?
Control-M shows all the tasks that feed into our applications in one clear place. I can quickly check if a data load, report, or system update ran the way it should. The alerts also help us catch issues early.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some menus take a few clicks to reach, and new users need time to learn where everything is. The design could be simpler, especially when you have many jobs linked together.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M helps us see job status fast, fix issues before users notice, and understand how different systems connect. It reduces guesswork and speeds up daily support work.
Reliable and Efficient Workflow Management with Control-M
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate how Control-M simplifies the management of complex workflows. The centralized dashboards are extremely valuable to me, enabling a comprehensive view of all my jobs, dependencies, and SLAs in one location. This centralization significantly improves my efficiency by providing quick access to critical information. I also love how swiftly I can troubleshoot failures thanks to the clear logs and alerts, which save me a lot of time. Overall, Control-M makes my batch processes more reliable, automated, and predictable. These features collectively streamline my operations and ensure that our workflows are both reliable and highly efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel that the user interface of Control-M is a bit heavy and not very intuitive, especially for new users. This complexity sometimes leads to creating complex workflows requiring more clicks than anticipated. Additionally, the logs provided can be overly detailed, which makes identifying the exact error line time-consuming. While the platform is reliable once familiar, these initial challenges can be a hurdle.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Control-M to automate and monitor workflows, minimize manual errors, ensure timely batch processing, handle dependencies, and swiftly resolve failures, enhancing the reliability and efficiency of our operations.
instrument for overseeing daily operations
What do you like best about the product?
Managing tasks across various systems without switching between tools is made simple with Control-M. The timeline view makes it easier to keep track of what's pending, what's running, and potential delays. Additionally, it provides unambiguous alerts, making it simple to respond before a problem impacts workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
When establishing new workflows, some configuration steps seem a little onerous. In some places, the interface might use some updating. Because the platform is so feature-rich, it also takes time for new users to comprehend all of the options.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M minimizes manual labor and scheduling errors by assisting in task coordination across various applications. It makes it simpler to locate bottlenecks by centralizing all job monitoring in one location. This keeps things running smoothly and increases the overall stability of our processes.
Effortless Scheduling That Saves Time
What do you like best about the product?
I like how it allows me to schedule jobs all on one. It gives me full visibility
What do you dislike about the product?
It looks really old and blocky, not good ui and not intuitive
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Apps on my team rely on scripts, or separate pipeline tools. Hard to track, no central view, and easy to miss failures. I don’t need to log into multiple servers to understand batch behavior. It saves time debugging because everything is in a single pane of glass.
Efficient Workflow Management, But Pricey
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate Control-M for its ability to automate and manage various workflows, which significantly reduces the need for manual monitoring. It efficiently schedules jobs and tracks dependencies, ensuring that processes run smoothly, even when multiple systems are involved. One of the standout features for me is how it consolidates all workflows into a single platform, providing clear visibility over every job, its status, and its dependencies. This integration minimizes the need to switch between different tools, drastically reducing manual work and simplifying the management of complex processes. Overall, Control-M saves time, reduces errors, and enhances operational organization.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find Control-M to be somewhat complex initially, which slows down development. Its performance tends to be sluggish, particularly when managing multiple workflows. The pricing is quite complex and the licensing fees are very high, which makes the cost aspect challenging. Additionally, the user interface could use some improvement, and I feel that cloud integration needs to be enhanced.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Control-M to automate workflows across systems, saving time and reducing errors. It centralizes job scheduling and monitoring, providing clear visibility and simplifying management. This reduces manual work and keeps operations organized despite initial complexity.
showing 31 - 40