Horizon3.ai NodeZero Platform
Horizon3.aiExternal reviews
2 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Deploying autonomous security tools improves network protection and efficiency
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case for the NodeZero Platform is as an extension to existing vulnerability management systems. Initially, it complemented solutions like Qualys or Tenable. However, there has been a shift towards using NodeZero to replace existing vulnerability management solutions altogether. The motivations include cost savings and addressing issues that traditional vulnerability managers might report but do not actually affect system security.
What is most valuable?
Deploying the NodeZero Platform is straightforward for me as it involves just a Docker container in a network or a network segment, saving time and eliminating the need for agents on every endpoint. Its autonomous operation, safe for production use, makes it practical to schedule pen tests during business hours. The tripwires feature acts like a honeypot, providing network alerts for potential threats. These factors make it an effective tool for enhancing security in organizations.
What needs improvement?
One of the areas where improvement is needed is in the visibility and reporting for large enterprises. The existing GUI or NodeZero insights provide better visibility, but there's still room for enhancement. Moreover, there is a need to automate interactions with other systems, particularly in triggering or opening tickets in ServiceNow. Adding the application layer would also be valuable for clients.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for 1.5 years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No issues were encountered in deploying the NodeZero Platform. Once the firewalls are open and communication with the cloud is enabled, it's a matter of installing a Docker container or VMware and opening the ports for smooth operation.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the stability of the NodeZero Platform a ten out of ten. We have not encountered any issues on the platform regarding accessibility, performance, or stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the scalability of the NodeZero Platform a ten out of ten. We have conducted pen tests in environments with hundreds of thousands of IP addresses without any scalability issues. The platform is built for large scale deployment and operation.
How are customer service and support?
I rate their support an eight out of ten. The support is skilled and effective, although there are sometimes delays due to bandwidth issues, possibly due to the size of the team.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Initially, NodeZero and similar solutions were used alongside existing vulnerability management solutions like Qualys or Tenable. However, there has been a shift towards replacing these existing solutions as businesses seek to address vulnerability issues more efficiently.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy, rated 10 out of 10. It involves straightforward steps of installing a Docker container, configuring firewalls, and ensuring communication with the cloud.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment process involves an initial meeting with the client to choose the deployment method—either on a VMware or Docker container. This is followed by defining and setting up firewall rules. After preparing everything, deploying the Docker container or VMware takes a few minutes, and the pen test can begin.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate the pricing a six out of ten. Pricing is moderate compared to competitors but depends on the solutions in comparison. While cheaper than XM Cyber and human pen testers, it's more expensive than vulnerability managers.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated Pentera and XM Cyber alongside the NodeZero Platform at various points. Pentera was assessed about two years ago, and we have clients currently using XM Cyber.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the NodeZero Platform an eight out of ten. The platform is scalable and stable, suitable for large enterprises and businesses. It needs improvement in areas like visibility, reporting, and automation with third-party systems. The overall product rating is eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Penetration testing adapts to our schedule with cloud integration
What is our primary use case?
To meet standards, I am required to do penetration testing periodically. This is something I can do on-demand anytime I choose, or I can set it up to recur on a recurring schedule.
What is most valuable?
The NodeZero Platform has a great cost, and its usability is straightforward. It can be deployed in the cloud. There is an on-premise container that I need to spin up to allow it to run in my environment, but it is automatically updated because it is cloud-based. It uses AI to try and gain access to my network and learns from the environment as it goes, providing a report on vulnerabilities, and demonstrates how their system exploits them to either elevate privilege or gain access to specific credentials or devices.
What needs improvement?
I haven't really come across anything that I say needs to be improved with it, other than the container runner, which tends to lose time. It does not always sync with the cloud versions, so I have to do it manually.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for over a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Initially, there were some devices that, when it scanned, it caused network issues. So I had to exclude those, but that was fairly simple to do.
How are customer service and support?
I reached out to support and they were very responsive. I would rate them a nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have reviewed other penetration testing solutions but haven't used them due to cost constraints, as they were really expensive compared to the NodeZero Platform.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was simple and easy to operate.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is much more affordable than traditional penetration tests.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have reviewed other penetration testing solutions but did not use any due to cost constraints.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise taking advantage of the support when you have it. For Horizon360 NodeZero, they are always responsive. Let them show you how to use it and the best way to get the most out of it. Overall, I'd rate NodeZero at nine to 9.5 out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Fast, Accurate and Affordable
What do you like best about the product?
Finding the misconfigurations that have been inherent to an environment for years. Finding weaknesses that I didn't realize were an issue. Finally the ability to be alerted by Rapid Response for existing new vulnerabilities that are exploitable.
What do you dislike about the product?
No downside. If there is one part that I would like more out of is the application testing (specifically on the external pentests)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Securing environments by finding weaknesses that creat major gaps within. Also validating security tools.
Doesn’t identify threats and vulnerabilities, and the reports are quite useless
What is our primary use case?
The solution is used for penetration testing.
What is most valuable?
Penetration testing and scans are useful features. These features are the reason why we started using the product.
What needs improvement?
We run the penetration testing and look at the reports. The reports are quite useless. We are looking for a different product. The tool did not help enhance our organization's cybersecurity posture. The reports had a lot of false positives. They didn't detect anything. The tool didn’t identify any vulnerabilities. The solution must detect threats and vulnerabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for about a year. I am using the latest version of the solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We didn’t have any issues with stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We didn’t have any issues with scalability. We didn’t need it.
How are customer service and support?
My team interacts with the support team. I haven't heard any complaints.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is deployed on the cloud. The initial deployment was easy.
What was our ROI?
We haven’t seen a return on investment.
What other advice do I have?
We used another solution parallelly. We got help from a third-party vendor to do that. I will definitely not recommend the product to others. It was quite useless for us. It didn't give us any useful results. Overall, I rate the solution a one out of ten.
showing 1 - 4