BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,615 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Comprehensive Testing with Real Device Emulation
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to do design reviews of mobile application builds, and it helps me verify whether development matches the provided design. BrowserStack lets me view APK builds on different resolutions of mobile devices at the same time, reducing my time and effort. I appreciate that it gives the experience of testing on a real device, offering various mobile and desktop resolutions. It offers features similar to a real mobile device, like network and screenshots. The screenshot feature is incredibly valuable as I can take screenshots, verify them against the Figma designs, and create documentation for developers if changes are needed. This definitely makes my work better and provides proof of what changes need to be done.
What do you dislike about the product?
I noticed that when using multiple devices at once while testing an APK build, they don't sync properly if one of them is on an older version, like below V11. Also, the initial setup was a bit confusing and the UI can be better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for design reviews of mobile apps, verifying development against provided designs. It offers multiple device resolutions, saving time and effort. I also value the screenshot feature for matching designs and marking differences for developers.
Essential for Pre-Release Mobile Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I primarily use BrowserStack to test mobile versions before releases and updates. It allows me to validate new features, fixes, and UI changes across different devices and operating systems, ensuring stability and a smooth user experience before going live. I especially like being able to view network traffic and easily see which endpoints the mobile app is calling. This helps me quickly see whether issues are caused by a 500 error on the backend or by an incorrect payload sent from the UI. The initial setup was quite easy too.
What do you dislike about the product?
The network inspection could be improved to be more detailed and easier to use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test mobile versions before releases, catch device-specific issues, reduce release risks, and ensure smooth user experiences across various devices and operating systems.
Extensibility That Sets It Apart
What do you like best about the product?
extensibiility and ease of use and deployment
What do you dislike about the product?
complication when just starting off, number of features can be little overwhelming
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
compatibility checking
Quick Support and Easy Setup, Needs Enhanced Mobile Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack's support team responds very quickly and is willing to connect over call to solve our problems. The tool is also user-friendly, making it easy for any manual tester to adopt quickly. The initial setup was very easy, and I appreciate the guidance from the BrowserStack team, who helped us set up and start our proof of concept.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the support for native mobile app automation and performance testing lacking. Right now, BrowserStack only supports web responsive mobile apps. It should extend support to native mobile apps and include performance testing with load.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves scenarios like data entry in Word Documents, drag-and-drop actions, creating actions using AI, and repeating test steps multiple times using loops. It's user-friendly and offers quick support, making it easy for manual testers to adopt.
Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Seamless Automation Integration
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is a very reliable platform for cross-browser and cross-device testing, especially in automation scenarios. The biggest advantage is the wide range of real devices and browsers available without the need to maintain physical hardware or complex local infrastructure.
From an automation perspective, BrowserStack integrates well with Selenium and supports modern CI/CD pipelines. Running tests in parallel significantly reduces execution time, which is critical in larger projects. The stability of sessions and overall platform availability are also strong points.
Additionally, the UI is intuitive and makes it easy to quickly debug failing tests using logs, screenshots, and video recordings.
From an automation perspective, BrowserStack integrates well with Selenium and supports modern CI/CD pipelines. Running tests in parallel significantly reduces execution time, which is critical in larger projects. The stability of sessions and overall platform availability are also strong points.
Additionally, the UI is intuitive and makes it easy to quickly debug failing tests using logs, screenshots, and video recordings.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasionally, browser or device availability can be limited during peak hours, which may require some scheduling adjustments. In rare cases, test execution can be slightly slower compared to local environments, especially for more complex test suites.
Pricing can also be a consideration for smaller teams, although it is understandable given the scope of features and infrastructure provided.
Pricing can also be a consideration for smaller teams, although it is understandable given the scope of features and infrastructure provided.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of maintaining and scaling cross-browser and cross-device test environments. Instead of managing multiple local machines or physical devices, we can execute tests reliably in the cloud.
This significantly improves test coverage and confidence in releases while reducing maintenance overhead. It also enables the team to catch browser-specific issues earlier in the development cycle, which directly improves product quality and release stability.
This significantly improves test coverage and confidence in releases while reducing maintenance overhead. It also enables the team to catch browser-specific issues earlier in the development cycle, which directly improves product quality and release stability.
Streamlined Mobile Testing with Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack simplifies mobile automation testing and improves efficiency. The ability to run automated tests on real Android and iOS devices in parallel is fantastic because it helps us catch real-world issues that emulators might miss. The inbuilt Appium inspector is very helpful, speeding up element inspection and debugging, making script development and troubleshooting much quicker. Percy visual testing is another feature I appreciate, as it makes it easy to catch UI regressions across devices and maintain a consistent user experience. The platform also saves significant time during testing cycles, improves test coverage, and reduces the risk of bugs reaching production. The initial setup was very good due to the elaborated document provided by BrowserStack, making it easy for us to get started. Overall, it helps reduce manual effort and the automation runtime.
What do you dislike about the product?
During multiple platform testing, the Appium inspector can sometimes load slowly when switching back between devices, and test execution may occasionally feel slower on certain devices. It would be better if BrowserStack allows stability while using multiple devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for cross-browser and cross-device testing, which simplifies catching compatibility issues early. It eliminates maintaining physical devices, speeds up testing cycles, improves test coverage, and reduces bugs reaching production.
Outstanding Experience from Start to Finish
What do you like best about the product?
Real device testing offers broad coverage, straightforward integration, and a setup process that is free of complications.
What do you dislike about the product?
It can be costly at times, and I have noticed occasional performance lags. Additionally, the options for offline testing are somewhat limited.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
This solution addresses device and browser fragmentation, accelerates testing processes, lowers infrastructure expenses, and enhances overall app quality.
Seamless Test Management and Effortless Jira Integration
What do you like best about the product?
i like the test management tools that browserStack offers. it's easy to use and also easy to integrate with your Jira instance.
It was also a good experience with their team who made sure we have all we need to make the right decision on what tool we need.
It was also a good experience with their team who made sure we have all we need to make the right decision on what tool we need.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would say i did not like that LCA is not available for per user basis.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack is providing us a solution for test management . and that also in a good cost . it helped us save about 50% in cost. and the AI Test feature also helps our team a lot during QA process
Boosts Productivity with Extensive Device Coverage and Seamless Integrations
What do you like best about the product?
The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is the wide range of real devices and browsers it offers. Being able to quickly test across different OS versions, browsers, and mobile devices without maintaining physical hardware is a huge productivity boost. The Live testing experience is smooth, device responsiveness is good, and session startup times are generally fast.
I also appreciate the integrations with popular tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and CI/CD pipelines, which makes it easy to plug BrowserStack into existing workflows. Debugging tools like console logs, screenshots, video recordings, and network logs are very helpful when investigating failures.
I also appreciate the integrations with popular tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and CI/CD pipelines, which makes it easy to plug BrowserStack into existing workflows. Debugging tools like console logs, screenshots, video recordings, and network logs are very helpful when investigating failures.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing can feel a bit high, especially for smaller teams or individual developers, and concurrency limits sometimes become a bottleneck when multiple people are testing at the same time. Occasionally, certain devices may feel slightly slower or unavailable during peak hours. The UI, while functional, could be more intuitive in a few areas, particularly when managing sessions or switching between devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack works really well for regression testing, cross-browser compatibility checks, and validating fixes on real mobile devices before release. It has helped catch browser-specific issues early and reduced production bugs, which ultimately saves time and effort for the team.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing with Seamless Automation Integration
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about BrowserStack is its ability to provide fast and reliable access to a wide range of real devices and browsers without any infrastructure or maintenance overhead. It makes cross-browser and cross-device testing simple and accurate, closely reflecting real user conditions. The smooth integration with automation tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and CI/CD pipelines, along with built-in debugging features such as logs, screenshots, and video recordings, helps teams identify and fix issues quickly, making the overall testing process efficient and dependable.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack is that it can sometimes feel slow or laggy, especially during peak usage hours or when running tests on older devices. The pricing can also be on the higher side for small teams or individual users. Additionally, occasional flaky sessions or unexpected disconnects during live testing can interrupt the workflow, and debugging network- or device-specific issues may still require some local reproduction.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without the need to maintain costly and complex in-house device labs. It benefits me by saving time and effort, enabling quick and reliable cross-browser and real-device testing from anywhere, and helping catch compatibility issues early. This improves product quality, speeds up release cycles through automation and CI/CD integration, and gives confidence that the application will work well for real users across different environments.
showing 81 - 90