BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,615 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Fast, Efficient Multi-Device Testing with Minor Video Quality Hurdles
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate BrowserStack's speed and performance, especially since there are no lags or degraded performance noticed on this platform, unlike some other platforms like LambdaTest. The ability to test the same app over multiple devices, whether iOS or Android, and have parallel sessions to see real-time results is very useful. I also find the new features like Image Injection helpful for testing camera scenarios. The provision for testing local apps by setting up a tunnel and storing APKs on Google Drive for easy access is a nice feature. Additionally, integrating BrowserStack with Jira has been seamless, with execution results and evidence getting updated directly in Jira.
What do you dislike about the product?
Well, there were some limitations with regards to video recording quality. Since these videos were getting attached in JIRA tickets, we saw the quality was not optimum.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows me to test apps over multiple devices and browsers, including local apps using a tunnel. It enables parallel sessions and offers real-time results. The speed and performance are excellent, with features like Image Injection enhancing testing scenarios.
Essential Tool for Comprehensive Multi-Device Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack great for testing various functionalities and key features of our site across different devices and geographic locations. I appreciate its support for Local Environment Testing. BrowserStack has been a pioneer in helping businesses support end-to-end testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Initial session startup time can be improved a little bit.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing our site's functionalities across various devices and locations. It solves multi-device testing needs and allows flexibility for different screen sizes.
Great Cross-Browser Testing, But Needs Smoother Performance and Clearer Debugging
What do you like best about the product?
I really like how easy it is to test on many different browsers and real devices without having to set anything up locally. It saves a lot of time and gives confidence that things work in real user environments. The integrations and debugging tools also make it practical to use in everyday development and testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
BrowserStack is generally a very useful tool, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved. Sometimes test execution feels slow or unstable, especially during peak hours, which can affect productivity. Debugging issues is not always straightforward, and clearer error messages and logs would really help when sessions fail. The UI can also feel a bit cluttered, and navigating between sessions, logs, and settings is not always intuitive. Automated tests can be flaky at times, so better stability and diagnostics would be a big improvement. Lastly, pricing and limits on parallel execution can be restrictive for growing teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing across many browsers and real devices without needing to maintain physical hardware or complex local setups. This benefits me by saving time, reducing setup overhead, and giving confidence that features work reliably for users in real environments.
Centralized Testing Artifacts, Smooth Setup
What do you like best about the product?
I like the centralized place for test artifacts because it enables team collaboration and makes test analysis fast and straightforward. I find the initial setup of BrowserStack very easy with clear documentation.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like the occasional flakiness and slower session startup times with BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for running e2e Selenium tests daily. It solves test results analysis and provides a centralized place for test artifacts, enabling team collaboration and making test analysis fast and straightforward.
Browserstack-One tool for all your Manual and Automation testing needs.
What do you like best about the product?
It provides cross platform testing, a wide range of iOS/Android devices to test mobile apps and lot of browser versions to test website. It has got good automation features, and it is of my great use to automate and record each rum of our mobile and web automation. The customer support is awesome, and they schedule calls as well to update us on the new features.
What do you dislike about the product?
Don't dislike anything about the tool, but browserstack can introduce recording in Live section.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is solving the problem of multi device and multi-platform testing. With its wide range of devices, we can test are apps on different sizes and versions. Same goes with web. We can test the website on Windows, MAC and different versions of browser. The automation feature is also helpful in recording the tests and ease of its integration with other automation tools.
Streamlined Cross-Device Testing with Minor Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack provides a single platform for various device testing, which simplifies the process. Also, the initial setup is easy, making it convenient to get started.
What do you dislike about the product?
For the same website or app, I need to provide all the details again and again. It's time-consuming and it loses my interest to use BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for quality testing, solving cross-device testing problems. It provides a single platform for testing on various devices.
Seamless Integrations to offload manual testing
What do you like best about the product?
Integrations, amount of devices, easy to setup, easy flows
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance is not ideal for CICD implementations
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Regression testing in mobile apps, in CICD
Effortless to Use with Impressive, Evolving Features
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use product constantly being updated with great functionaliity
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing really, maybe fact that admin/owner has to be a user and uses a licence even though not an active tester
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
cross device and o/s testing
Exceptionally User-Friendly and Easy to Use
What do you like best about the product?
easy to use, very user friendly, lot of browsers
What do you dislike about the product?
i like this product).
Not sure what i should type here if i like this product.
Not sure what i should type here if i like this product.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
helps to resolve case when need to check some functionallity or feature on different browser or browser with specific version
Versatile Suite Perfect for Testing Needs
What do you like best about the product?
The various applications in the suite that we can use for our testing requirements.
What do you dislike about the product?
Test case management could use some improvements if we are to move away from our current solution TestRail.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It works great for live testing as well as utilizing Percy and App Live as we start to move more into the mobile application testing space.
showing 41 - 50