BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,619 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Good for automation testing, saves time
What do you like best about the product?
Main thing I like is how easily it works with my automation framework. I use Selenium mostly and it was not hard to connect with BrowserStack. You just run the test and it will execute on multiple browsers or devices, no setup required. Also I like the dashboard which shows session details and logs, helps in debugging.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes execution feels bit slow specially on mobile. Also if internet is not stable, it disconnects. And one more thing is price, for more minutes or parallel runs you need to pay more.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I don’t have to maintain local setup for testing now. It’s easy to run automation on multiple browsers in cloud. This saves time and effort. We also use it in CI pipeline so now we get quick feedback after every deployment.
the best tool to automate mobile dev
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is the ability to test on real devices. It gives me a more authentic feel for how things will actually perform on users' phones and desktops. Plus, the fact that you can run tests across different browsers quickly is super helpful for spotting issues early.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I don't love is the cost. It can get pretty pricey, especially if you're a smaller team or a freelancer. And sometimes, the performance feels a little slow, especially on mobile testing. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it can be annoying when you're trying to move fast.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Building apps on multiple device types including iOS and Android and automating tests.
Browserstack was excellent for our QA team
What do you like best about the product?
Cloud testing is so much easy, we used to have physical phone to test so many scenarios but with Browserstack it is piece of cake.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing so far, i have observed which i would say i disliked about Browserstack
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Maintaining the physical environment for testing
Save Your Time with Crossbrowser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Supports a vast range of browsers and operating systems.
Provides access to real devices for testing across different browsers, OS, and combinations.
Access from anywhere makes it highly convenient for remote teams.
Integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools.
Enables parallel testing, which speeds up the test execution process significantly.
Offers tools like developer logs, network logs, and screenshots for debugging issues.
Live and Automated Testing Options.
Allows testing of locally hosted or firewalled websites using a secure BrowserStack tunnel.
Provides access to real devices for testing across different browsers, OS, and combinations.
Access from anywhere makes it highly convenient for remote teams.
Integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools.
Enables parallel testing, which speeds up the test execution process significantly.
Offers tools like developer logs, network logs, and screenshots for debugging issues.
Live and Automated Testing Options.
Allows testing of locally hosted or firewalled websites using a secure BrowserStack tunnel.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some slowness and latency for Live Testing, particularly for heavy applications.
BrowserStack is relatively expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers, and lower-tier plans often limit the number of parallel sessions.
Debugging locally hosted or firewalled websites can be slower than testing on a local device.
BrowserStack requires an active internet connection since it’s entirely cloud-based, which can be a disadvantage in environments with unreliable connectivity.
Slow responses or insufficient solutions from customer support for technical issues, especially on lower-tier plans.
BrowserStack is relatively expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers, and lower-tier plans often limit the number of parallel sessions.
Debugging locally hosted or firewalled websites can be slower than testing on a local device.
BrowserStack requires an active internet connection since it’s entirely cloud-based, which can be a disadvantage in environments with unreliable connectivity.
Slow responses or insufficient solutions from customer support for technical issues, especially on lower-tier plans.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows to ensure that applications work flawlessly across different platforms and devices, leading to better user satisfaction. Eliminates the need for physical infrastructure, saving significant costs. Speeds up regression testing cycles.
WCAG Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack has a feature for WCAG Accessibility testing on mobile apps and the web as well. Here we can also automate our testing and reporting for any number execution.
Along with that we get a visual scanner with the Accessibility testing to test our app and web UI.
After the execution of the test we get a detailed report where we can also see the impacts of the issues discovered in the Accessibility testing.
Along with that we get a visual scanner with the Accessibility testing to test our app and web UI.
After the execution of the test we get a detailed report where we can also see the impacts of the issues discovered in the Accessibility testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
When you test for only accessibility testing it will take 1-2 min for a whole page of a website but when you turn on the visual scanner it is taking a lot of time for execution.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have scheduled accessibility testing to run on every day at specific time on the day. For implementing this accessibility testing for our website we don't need to build any framework or create pipeline, everything we are doing related to accessibility testing is in its platform only.
BrowserStack makes the Visual Testing Easier
What do you like best about the product?
So the best thing about BrowserStack to provide best support for Visual Testing
Cross Browser as well as Cross Platform Testing.
It is very easy to integrate with my existing framework.
Easy to implement in any Automation Tool.
Cross Browser as well as Cross Platform Testing.
It is very easy to integrate with my existing framework.
Easy to implement in any Automation Tool.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the false positive scenarios got failed.
Sometime the dynamic data validation are not as per the mark.
Sometime the dynamic data validation are not as per the mark.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Visual Testing is the most underratted testing. No one looks into it till anything is break on prod. When we talk about Visual Testing it provides the best support to test. Not only visuals on a single browser but also we can achieve the same on Multiple Browsers. Not only to specific to one resolution but also for multiple resolutions.
AI Revolution on Testing
What do you like best about the product?
easy access user friendly information with all
What do you dislike about the product?
need explore more not sure what is the exact part
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Remote testing feature and info
A great testing platform
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of testing application across multiple browsers
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes mobile devices don't connect it takes time to load
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing application across different browsers, devices and versions
Low Code automation via Browser Stack
What do you like best about the product?
1. Low code automation
2. Converting manual test scripts to automation test script
3. Involve AI wherever possible
2. Converting manual test scripts to automation test script
3. Involve AI wherever possible
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Slow when manual browser testing using cloud
2. User interaction with browser takes time which consumes more time than testing in the real browser install in the client machine
2. User interaction with browser takes time which consumes more time than testing in the real browser install in the client machine
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation Testing
Cross browser testing
Cost cutting when no original need in place to test the features in different devices
Cross browser testing
Cost cutting when no original need in place to test the features in different devices
I got to learn about a new terminology, so it was a great experience.
What do you like best about the product?
It's different features such as cross browser functionality, guidelines, ideologies.
What do you dislike about the product?
It's a paid service which might not be accessible to everyone.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation of tasks and cross browser tests
showing 441 - 450