BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,619 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Real time device simulator with perfect precision
What do you like best about the product?
I like the multiple device type support that browser stack is offering
What do you dislike about the product?
Customer support is not upto mark and the pricing is also way too far than that of expected
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It resolved the challenges of maintaining physical devices when comes to compatiblity check across devices
Browserstack with Clubforce
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of use for the emulated devices
What do you dislike about the product?
The only major drawback for browserstack is the pricing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Load Testing and app testing are the main uses for us as we have a very large client base
Outstanding Product
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is an outstanding platform for cross-browser and cross-device testing. It allows developers and QA teams to instantly test websites and applications across thousands of real devices, operating systems, and browsers without needing to maintain a complex in-house lab.
The biggest advantage is its real device cloud—unlike emulators or simulators, you’re testing on actual devices, which gives far more accurate results. The performance is smooth, setup is quick, and the platform integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and CircleCI.
I especially appreciate the Live Testing feature for quick manual checks and the Automate functionality for running Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright test suites at scale. The debugging tools (screenshots, logs, video recordings, network traffic capture) make identifying and resolving issues much faster.
The biggest advantage is its real device cloud—unlike emulators or simulators, you’re testing on actual devices, which gives far more accurate results. The performance is smooth, setup is quick, and the platform integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and CircleCI.
I especially appreciate the Live Testing feature for quick manual checks and the Automate functionality for running Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright test suites at scale. The debugging tools (screenshots, logs, video recordings, network traffic capture) make identifying and resolving issues much faster.
What do you dislike about the product?
One major drawback is performance—sessions can be slow, with noticeable lag during live testing, especially on older devices. This makes it frustrating to debug UI issues in real time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ability to run tests across various devices and platforms is a big plus.
BrowserStack is easy to use tool and are continuously upgrading
What do you like best about the product?
This product is incredibly easy to use, even for beginners. Its intuitive design and smooth usability makes tasks more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Lag and slowness: Testing environments can be slow to load, especially on older devices or with certain browsers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Multiple browser testing
Browser Stack is a tool for real device testing
What do you like best about the product?
Great tool for real device testing. App live allows for real device app testing. Easy to stepup and begin testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Limited reporting capability within the testing tool.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
.BrowserStack allows testers to conduct tests across multiple platforms in a single testing cycle, which helps reduce execution times. It enables testers to perform testing without needing physical devices.
Great for Multi-Platform Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I really like that I can test in different browsers on different types of devices. I only have Apple products and being able to test on PC is great.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it can take a little long to load a session.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Being able to access different versions of OS and browsers
Great app
What do you like best about the product?
i use app live and the availability of devices is good, the location and time zones changing has been very helpfull for my team
What do you dislike about the product?
you need a really good laptop to run BS correctly
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have a few mobile apps and the app live product has helped us with the "device farm"
Visual Testing improvements
What do you like best about the product?
Browser Stack Percy tool helped me to improve visual testing automation efficiency in my team. The results of the tests always help to find regressions for UI that I would not be able to notice myself.
The demo to other teams in a company pushed other teams also to start using the tool, making our UX team happy as well.
Very easy to integrate and implement with existing Playwright tests in any languages.
The demo to other teams in a company pushed other teams also to start using the tool, making our UX team happy as well.
Very easy to integrate and implement with existing Playwright tests in any languages.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some flakiness of the Percy tool sometimes, very minor, not blocking the process.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation of Visual tests, preventing regression and helping to improve approval process with UX team.
Useful for my automated tests
What do you like best about the product?
I like the possibility of having different devices available to perform tests on each one, thus covering the detection of possible specific defects. I also value being able to run automated tests without relying on an Android emulator or a physical device, which can sometimes be unstable.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I don't like is that when running an automation test and reviewing the text log in BrowserStack, the experience is not as complete as when directly checking the output.xml generated by Robot Framework. It would be ideal if there were an integration or session where BrowserStack could be fed that result, so it wouldn't be necessary to open another tab to view the final report.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
A problem I notice in BrowserStack is that the logs are not always as complete as those in Robot Framework, and sometimes starting a real device takes longer than a local emulator. However, this benefits me because in return I get executions in real environments, with videos, screenshots, and metrics that strengthen failure analysis, in addition to saving on the maintenance of physical devices and gaining scalability by executing in parallel.
BrowserStack broadens our testing capabilities anywhere in the world
What do you like best about the product?
I like the fact that I have a lot of mobile devices to choose from. It has saved us many times from having to acquire a specific phone to test for our clients.
What do you dislike about the product?
Limitation to do specific tests on mobile devices with apps that require camera usage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of having to acquire one or multiple physical devices and send it to one of our testers all over the world and so it benefits us with keeping a lower cost for this purpose.
showing 281 - 290