BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,619 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Browserstack
What do you like best about the product?
It helps with cross browser and cross system testing for web applications
What do you dislike about the product?
It's a little resource intensive and can slow down the system.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helps test software with large user base using different systems
It is very helpful and useful tool
What do you like best about the product?
Realtime application testing, running atomation statuses
What do you dislike about the product?
UI little bit confusing for the beginners
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing applications using browserstack is so convenient
Excellent solution, very flexible
What do you like best about the product?
The possibility of having access to different desktop and mobile systems very quickly
What do you dislike about the product?
Access to the developer console is difficult
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
No longer need to have many different devices and keep them updated
Simple to use and great for testing UI across multiple devices.
What do you like best about the product?
I introduced BrowserStack to my second company, and it quickly became a favorite. Previously, we relied on a phone, an iPad, and a large-screen device to test our web UI — a costly and impractical setup. As a part-time freelancer, purchasing all those devices was beyond my budget, and I often had to borrow them from friends and family just to ensure proper testing. BrowserStack solved this challenge seamlessly. I started with the free version, and after experiencing its value, I upgraded to the paid plan. It has been a game-changer for our testing process.
What do you dislike about the product?
Limited free version, most useful features require a paid plan.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing across multiple devices, browsers, and OS versions without needing to buy them. It saves time, reduces cost, and ensures my web app works consistently for all users.
Great user experience
What do you like best about the product?
its ability to provide real-time testing on actual devices rather than emulators.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it works too much slow and hence a disadvantage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Reduced testing time and cost: BrowserStack allows developers and testers to test their web applications on various browsers and devices at once, as opposed to manual testing, saving them time and money.
Browser Stack Usage Review
What do you like best about the product?
Its versatility, Easy Usage and emulators to provide real time devices as well the features to inspect traffic on mobile apps.
What do you dislike about the product?
It has a very basic UI and not fully responsive, the features are provided well but scattered over different modules.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved my emulator problem which required me to install Android Studio in my computer but the specs take to run AS is very high and advance, using browser stack we do not need that much of high specs as we are looking for testing not development.
Streamlined Cross-Browser Testing Experience for QA Teams
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about BrowserStack is the ability to instantly access a wide range of real devices and browsers without maintaining a physical device lab. It allows me to perform cross-browser and cross-device testing seamlessly, ensuring accurate results. The live testing sessions are smooth with minimal latency, and the platform makes it very easy to switch between different OS and browser versions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Overall, BrowserStack is an excellent platform, but one area for improvement is the session speed and performance on certain devices, where occasional lag can be noticed during live testing on mobile. For example, when scrolling the screen on mobile devices, the response can sometimes feel slightly slower.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of maintaining a physical device lab for cross-browser and cross-device testing. It provides instant access to a wide range of real devices and browsers, allowing me to validate functionality, responsiveness, and UI/UX across multiple environments without extra hardware or setup costs. This not only improves test coverage and accuracy but also saves significant time and resources, enabling faster release cycles and higher product quality.
Used to Check the website with old configuration
What do you like best about the product?
Used to Check the website with old configuration
What do you dislike about the product?
The free version of testing on old browser’s configuration is quite short
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We managed to solves errors on old browsers
Three Years with Selenium, Appium, and BrowserStack: An Honest Review
What do you like best about the product?
I’ve been working with Selenium and Appium in Java for more than three years now, and during this time, one tool that has really become a core part of my setup is BrowserStack. In the beginning, I mostly used Selenium locally to automate web applications, but as soon as cross-browser coverage and multiple operating systems became a requirement, BrowserStack became the natural choice. Instead of maintaining a Selenium Grid or juggling driver and browser version mismatches, I could just connect my tests to BrowserStack’s cloud and instantly get access to all major browsers and versions. Running tests on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and even Safari on macOS machines became seamless, which is something I could never have pulled off locally without a lot of infrastructure effort.
One feature I found especially handy is the live debugging and video recordings of test sessions. Whenever a test failed, I didn’t have to just rely on stack traces or screenshots. BrowserStack gives you video replays, console logs, network logs, and device logs, which made debugging so much easier.
Parallel execution was another game-changer. Locally, running tests in parallel across browsers or devices always felt complicated, but with BrowserStack it was straightforward.
One feature I found especially handy is the live debugging and video recordings of test sessions. Whenever a test failed, I didn’t have to just rely on stack traces or screenshots. BrowserStack gives you video replays, console logs, network logs, and device logs, which made debugging so much easier.
Parallel execution was another game-changer. Locally, running tests in parallel across browsers or devices always felt complicated, but with BrowserStack it was straightforward.
What do you dislike about the product?
Test execution on BrowserStack is usually slower compared to running locally because of network latency and shared cloud resources. For long regression suites, this delay can add up significantly
Idle sessions often time out quickly. If you’re debugging or waiting for a build to complete, you might lose your session midway.
Since it’s cloud-based, the experience heavily depends on your internet connection quality. A poor connection can make debugging very frustrating.
Idle sessions often time out quickly. If you’re debugging or waiting for a build to complete, you might lose your session midway.
Since it’s cloud-based, the experience heavily depends on your internet connection quality. A poor connection can make debugging very frustrating.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I’ve been able to run the same automation scripts on local environments for quick feedback and then on BrowserStack for full coverage across browsers, devices, and operating systems. For me, BrowserStack has bridged the gap between “automation in theory” and “automation in the real world,” where you need to be sure that your web and mobile apps behave correctly for every type of user. Even after three years, I still find it an essential part of my testing workflow.
Browser stack is very useful especially for QA engineers for doing compatibility testing
What do you like best about the product?
Im basically QA Engineer where im supposed to do testing on multiple browsers , OS and multiple devices, for achieving it browser stack really helped a lot as we dont have to carry multiple devices and affording them also wouldnt be cost effective. With browser stack we are able to do QA on multiple browser and OS.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel connectivity and speed is bit slow
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is helping us in cost management. Instead of buying multiple devices we are managing testing on different environment using browser stack
showing 271 - 280