BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,619 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Accessibility Testing is pretty easy to use!
What do you like best about the product?
Website scanner and manual testing via BrowserStack's Chrome extension help us resolve some low-hanging fruit accessibility issues pretty quickly.
What do you dislike about the product?
I cannot think of anything at the moment.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Accessiblity Testing
great
What do you like best about the product?
easy to manage and easy to use and navigate
What do you dislike about the product?
i haven't found anything that has been a downfall
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
helps practice and able to assist customers
Nice product list and variants
What do you like best about the product?
They have extensive product list with variety of devices and OS versions.
What do you dislike about the product?
So far its all good as such. There isn't anything to highlight here.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
They have extensive product list with variety of devices and OS versions.
Great choice of devices, amazing perfomance
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack provides a lot of real devices to test on, with zero disconnection issues like the services i used before.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel like the limitations of BrowserStack could be lowered (like settings block). Sometimes userful options are locked there.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves a lot of problems with device compatibility. Before, we had a problems that our app would run o one device, but on other device it would produce errors. BrowserStack helps to solve these issues!
One of the best tool for testing mobile apps on different OEMs
What do you like best about the product?
The best thing is wide range of available OEMs on their platform which helps debug device related issues more efficiently.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing major as such, but I believe debug logs can be improved to serve better debugging experience
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Debugging OEM/device related issues and verifying their fix.
Essential tool for web apps or marketing sites
What do you like best about the product?
You can effortlessly switch between browser and operating system versions. This allows your engineering team to track down JS runtime issues or browser related quirks. There can be subtle issues between Mac, Windows, iOS and Android versions of the same browser.
What do you dislike about the product?
The free trial tier is kind of useless. Not enough time to actually conduct an investigation or set up a localhost proxy.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps me emulate users browser runtimes. We can respond to on call issues and test releases better.
Much needed for QAEs
What do you like best about the product?
It helps find the bugs that not every eye can capture. Especially the edge cases for cross browser testing. It is convenient to record video directly and attach in the JIRA.
What do you dislike about the product?
It has very limited access to the cloud devices as compared to other websites.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
When participating in bug bash with high level knowledge about the product, this helps us find edge cases with cross browser testing.
Points out the failing one among multiple API
Helps test application in different OEMs virtually though it is limitedly available.
Points out the failing one among multiple API
Helps test application in different OEMs virtually though it is limitedly available.
A Reliable Tool for Real-World Testing Across Devices
What do you like best about the product?
As a UX Engineer, one of the most valuable aspects of BrowserStack is its ability to let me test on real devices and operating systems remotely. This has been a game-changer for ensuring consistent user experiences across platforms without needing a physical device lab. The interface is intuitive, and spinning up a test environment takes just a few clicks. It’s especially helpful when debugging layout issues or performance quirks that only appear on specific device-browser combinations.
What do you dislike about the product?
While the platform is powerful, occasionally, the remote sessions can feel slightly laggy, especially when testing animations or transitions, which can make it harder to assess performance nuances. I’d also love to see deeper integrations with design tools or prototyping platforms in the future.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
With BrowserStack, I can instantly access real devices and environments remotely, which means I can catch layout bugs, performance issues, and compatibility problems early in the development cycle. This has significantly improved the quality of our releases and reduced the number of post-launch fixes.
Great experience to test mobile devices
What do you like best about the product?
It has variety of mobile devices to test
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes takes a lot of time to load some devices
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
How to see some apps or sections from pages in different screen sizes and they reflow properly
The functionality is valuable, but there is room for improvement in performance.
What do you like best about the product?
As an individual developer, BrowserStack Live allows me to perform real device debugging and style comparisons across multiple devices/browsers without the need for my own equipment. It's easy to use, has low implementation costs, and I use it before every regular regression test. The screenshot/recording evidence is also sufficient, and it really enhances my efficiency.
What do you dislike about the product?
The device loading and session switching are relatively slow during peak hours, with occasional lag, and some models (such as the SIM-equipped iPhone) have a long cold start waiting time, affecting the continuity of debugging experience. If the startup speed and stability can be further optimized, it would be more worthwhile for long-term use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved the difficulties I faced as an individual developer in multi-device compatibility and side-by-side comparison: it used to be very difficult to simultaneously check styles and interactions on the iPhone, Android, iPad, and desktop browsers, and it was also inconvenient to reproduce issues in an intranet environment.
showing 251 - 260