BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,615 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Automation Experience
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is the option to work on multiple mobile devices concurrently. This significantly simplifies cross-device testing and helps identify issues quickly and easily.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional performance lag and higher pricing are areas where BrowserStack could improve.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the difficulty of validating applications across diverse browsers and mobile devices without managing physical infrastructure. It benefits me by enabling parallel testing, faster bug detection, and confidence that the application performs consistently for all users.
Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Real Devices and Easy Automation
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack’s biggest strength is access to a wide range of real browsers and real devices, which makes cross-browser and cross-device testing much more reliable than emulators. It’s easy to start manual testing, and the platform supports popular automation frameworks, helping QA teams validate UI and functionality across environments with minimal setup.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance can be inconsistent at times, especially during peak usage, with noticeable lag on some devices. Automation debugging could be improved, as logs and error details are not always sufficient to quickly identify failures. Pricing is also relatively high, which may be challenging for smaller QA teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and OS versions without maintaining physical hardware. This improves test coverage, helps identify production issues earlier, and saves time and infrastructure costs while supporting both manual and automated testing workflows.
All-in-One Solution That Saves Time Effortlessly
What do you like best about the product?
It saves a lot of time because I don’t need to set up multiple browsers or devices locally. Everything is available in one place.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the sessions feel a bit slow, especially when using real mobile devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of testing across multiple browsers and devices without maintaining local setups, which saves a lot of time.
User-Friendly with Real Device Performance Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test our mobile applications and run our mobile automated scripts. I like having the option to use multiple models of iOS and Android devices, especially real devices, not just simulators. What I like most about BrowserStack is its ease of use and the integration for automation.
What do you dislike about the product?
I dread using the real device feature, cause it's very laggy to use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test our mobile applications and run automated scripts, offering multiple device models, real and simulated, with ease of use and automation integration.
Real devices, Real experience and Real results
What do you like best about the product?
Wide Range of Real devices plus amazing testing tools that come with BrowserStack.
What do you dislike about the product?
Cost is a little bit high particularly if your team is big and you use more and more products.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
By using BrowserStack we eliminate the need of buying physical devices which our customers use to access our websites.
Streamlined Mobile Testing on Multiple Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack allows me to test my suites on multiple devices, all from one platform. It's great to have access to different Android and iOS mobile devices for running and testing my cases. The platform supports both manual and automation testing, which I find very useful. I also found the initial setup to be good and easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like that BrowserStack does not give complete use of AI. We can't debug and write any code to enhance our tests. I need some AI-generated features, like a copilot.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to run test suites on multiple devices, both Android and iOS, which streamlines my testing process across different platforms.
Ease of using BrowserStack over any other simulator or physical device for mobiel testing.
What do you like best about the product?
I like the UI interface of browserstack app which making it very easy to use any mobile device. It provides various mobile devices and its model also it becomes seamless as we have chance testing our app in different devices.Easy to use and easy to integrate.
What do you dislike about the product?
i dont dislike anything about BrowserStack
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
To test app in real devices or physical devices is problematic as it requires a huge cost and dependency to carry charge and handle with care all these things. But BrowserStack solving this problem and gives benefits such as cost reduction, no handling caring things on phone.
Solves cross-browser issues
What do you like best about the product?
"The device coverage is a massive relief; having access to real hardware—from legacy Androids to the latest iPhones—without maintaining a physical lab is invaluable, though waiting in queues for popular devices can occasionally be frustrating. The logs are excellent, allowing us to view network requests and console errors on a remote device as if it were plugged into our own machines. Most importantly, the automatic video recordings are a game-changer for our workflow. Being able to attach video proof of a glitch directly to a ticket completely eliminates the 'I can't reproduce this' argument and speeds up fixes significantly."
What do you dislike about the product?
The input lag is the biggest frustration; because it’s streaming video, it’s often hard to distinguish between actual UI performance issues and just network latency.
The pricing is steep for what it is, making it a hard sell for smaller teams or individual developers.
Queues for popular devices (like the latest iPhone) are real; paying for a service and then waiting 5 minutes to get a phone feels wrong.
The pricing is steep for what it is, making it a hard sell for smaller teams or individual developers.
Queues for popular devices (like the latest iPhone) are real; paying for a service and then waiting 5 minutes to get a phone feels wrong.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Confidence: You stop guessing if your code works on older devices.
Validation: You can instantly reproduce a user's specific bug (e.g., "It crashes on Safari 15") without needing that physical hardware.
Validation: You can instantly reproduce a user's specific bug (e.g., "It crashes on Safari 15") without needing that physical hardware.
seamless mobile testing with API Integration
What do you like best about the product?
it provide a wide range of iOS and android devices with various version, even the process of uploading the apks or app file is very smooth, even the UI of the device layout is classic and user friendly, it also help me to reduce the testing time as i map the browserstack api over the jenkin job which auto trigger the test part.
What do you dislike about the product?
we are using the share browser stack , so over the peak times when all are using it, it provide the slowness over the testing, even there is difficult to debug over the devices as the log ui is still to old not able to retrieve ios logs correct mode to read.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
like i mentioned above, over the Jenkin we had integrated the browser stack using the shell script, which trigger the test case over the env, that the best approach as it helped a lot to do some manual task like selecting the device and install app, that can be done now with api.
Access iOS Testing Without an iPhone
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack lets me test on an iPhone device even though I don't have one, and the initial setup was quite easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
If it can load the preview and the console faster, would be great
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack lets me preview on iOS devices and Safari browser without having an iPhone.
showing 91 - 100