IBM Cloud Pak for Data is my main use case as it is a unified, cloud-native data and AI platform that enables my organization to collect, connect, govern, and analyze data across on-premises, private cloud, and public cloud. It enables data integration, data visualization, data governance, data cataloging, data lineage, master data management, and analytics through ML and AI workflows, all in one platform.
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
IBM SoftwareReviews from AWS customer
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Unified data platform has streamlined governance, accelerated analytics, and improved data access
What is our primary use case?
How would you rate primary use case?
Positive
What is most valuable?
The best features IBM Cloud Pak for Data offers include a unified all-in-one platform, hybrid multi-cloud and flexible deployment, and it supports all user skill levels, meaning it is very user-friendly.
Out of those features, I find myself relying on the unified all-in-one platform the most, which has made the biggest difference for my team. It streamlines workflows, reduces overhead in managing many tools, and ensures tight integration between data management, data governance, and data analytics and AI.
IBM Cloud Pak for Data has impacted my organization positively as it has helped us to streamline our workflows, reduce overhead in managing many tools, and ensure tight integration between data management and data governance. It has also helped us by allowing users to query status through built-in data governance, cataloging, and metadata management, ensuring data quality, lineage, security, and compliance.
How would you rate valuable features?
Positive
What needs improvement?
IBM Cloud Pak for Data can be improved because it has a steep learning curve and significant resource requirements. It can be heavy on our infrastructure, such as CPU and RAM storage.
I would also add that there is complex deployment and management for IBM Cloud Pak for Data, with the setup often being complex and requiring expertise.
How would you rate room for improvement?
Neutral
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM Cloud Pak for Data for the past four years.
How would you rate use of solution?
Positive
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
IBM Cloud Pak for Data is stable.
How would you rate stability?
Positive
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I find the performance and speed of IBM Cloud Pak for Data when working with large data sets to be scalable, as it can work with any kind of data, whether small or large.
IBM Cloud Pak for Data's scalability is very impressive, as it can handle any kind of data, whether large, small, or huge.
How would you rate scalability?
Positive
How are customer service and support?
The customer support for IBM Cloud Pak for Data is great and responsive.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used Databricks and Snowflake before switching to IBM Cloud Pak for Data.
How would you rate previous solutions?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate IBM Cloud Pak for Data an eight out of ten.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IBM Cloud Pak for Data indicates that the cost is efficient, but setting it up requires technical expertise overall.
How would you rate initial setup?
Positive
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, experiencing faster access to distributed data, reduction in manual ETL requests, elimination or reduction of manual cataloging and data preparation cost, and its very scalable nature.
How would you rate roi?
Positive
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IBM Cloud Pak for Data indicates that the cost is efficient, but setting it up requires technical expertise overall.
How would you rate pricing?
Positive
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing IBM Cloud Pak for Data, I evaluated other options, including Snowflake.
How would you rate other solutions considered?
Positive
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others looking into IBM Cloud Pak for Data that it is a significant cost-saving and resource optimization platform for organizations that need to access data quickly, with faster querying and streamlined workflows, which reduces time to value. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.
How would you rate other advice?
Positive
Starts strong with data management capabilities but needs a demo database
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case for Cloud Pak is that I am the reference Data steward for the Africa regions in the banks where I work. My main objective is to capture the reference data in Caltech or Data and ensure that people profile or QA their data.
This is due to the fact that a large percentage of data is actually reference data, not by volume, but by the number of tables. The group-approved reference data is used to assure quality and ensure people know what they have; that's my primary use case for Cloud Pak.
What is most valuable?
There's a whole bunch of stuff I really like. I love the way that I can start at a very basic level with my data management journey by capturing my policies, justifying my data, and putting them into different categories to say this is data relating to individuals, for example, or data relating to geography. Those base-level data management components, together with the reference data, can then be reused whether I want to figure out where the data is coming from—using Nantucket, for example—or checking the quality of my data.
Often, when I check the quality of my data, I might find an issue, but that data did not originate in the system where I found the issue. So, I need to use Nantucket to track back to where that data originally came from so I can fix it at the source. I love that component of Cloud Pak.
I do not do much with the machine learning or AI pieces. It is probably because I can start at a basic level with data management: policies, rules, categories, reference data, and business terms. From there, I can work my way into a more granular level, applying all of that information on top of my actual data to understand what my data looks like, where it came from, and where it went wrong, managing it throughout the cycle.
What needs improvement?
What I would love to see is an end-to-end, almost a training demo database of some sort, where one of the biggest problems with data management is demonstrated.
There are so many components to data management, and more often than not, people understand one thing really well. They may understand DataStage and how to move data around, but they do not see the impact of moving data incorrectly.
They also do not see the impact of everyone understanding a piece of data in the same way. I would love Cloud Pak to come with a demo database that illustrates the different components of data management in a logical way, so I can see the whole picture instead of just the area I'm specializing in.
It would be great if Cloud Pak, from a data modeling point of view, allowed us to import our PDMs, for example. It would be ideal to import and create business terms in Cloud Pak. The PEA would be great to create the technical data. The association between the business and the technical metadata could then be automated by pulling it through from your ACE models. The data modeling component is available in Cloud Pak.
Additionally, when it comes to Cloud Pak, even though it has the NextGen DataStage built into it, there is Cloud Pak for data integration as well. Currently, I do not think we have a full enough understanding of how CP4D and CP4I can enhance each other.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution since the end of 2021.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is endless if I can pay for it. Obviously, it is just for containers, however, I have to pay more.
How are customer service and support?
The response time is quick, however, solving the problem is not always as fast. Cloud Pak is a complicated system, and it's often difficult to find the right resource in IBM to help with specific issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The setup was very complete and very complex.
What about the implementation team?
We did the implementation with IBM.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The setup cost is very expensive. The cost depends on the pieces of the solution I'm using, how much data I have, and whether it's on the cloud or on-prem.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I've looked at Talend, Calibra, Denodo, Purview, and AWS Glue. It depends on the client's maturity in data management. If the client is only looking to do data quality as a small piece of data management, Denodo would be an excellent choice. If they are looking for end-to-end data management and have the technical resources to get Cloud Pak running and enabled with all functionalities, then definitely Cloud Pak. The choice depends on the maturity of the company.
What other advice do I have?
Cloud Pak is a very, very, very good system. I'm super impressed with it. The learning curve is high, but I gain so much when I finally figure it out.
Overall product rating: seven out of ten.
From Data Silos to Actionable Insights: IBM Cloud Pak for Data Delivers
Provides IBM Watson Catalog and data pipelines, but catalog searching needs to be improved
What is most valuable?
IBM Watson Catalog and data pipelines are the most valuable features of the solution.
What needs improvement?
Previously, we used to extract the information in the DSX and the XML formats. IBM Cloud Pak for Data exports information mostly on the ISX, which is an encrypted format. The only challenge with the tool is the metadata queries we try to understand.
We have to go with the lineage and other packages that come with IBM. Previously, we created our own reports depending on the existing command line export of the mappings. The solution's catalog searching or map search needs to be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM Cloud Pak for Data for two years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We usually recommend the solution for medium and large-scale organizations.
How are customer service and support?
My current organization is a Gold Partner with IBM. Whenever we reach out to the support team, the turnaround time is about 24 to 48 hours, which is pretty decent.
I rate the solution’s technical support an eight to nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The solution’s initial setup is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution's pricing is competitive with that of other vendors. The pricing also depends on the number of users.
What other advice do I have?
If people are with the existing stuff, I would definitely suggest they go with IBM Cloud Pak for Data. I usually recommend the solution for the financial sector, where I worked for about ten years. I worked with IBM for almost eight years. Unless they want to migrate to a new product completely, I recommend IBM Cloud Pak for Data to explore current business. It is easy to integrate the tool with other solutions.
Except for metadata queries, metadata validations, and metadata integrations, I don't see any issues with the solution. I would recommend the solution to other users if it supports their existing infrastructure.
Some people don't want to put their data in the cloud because they are concerned about how the data is secured with encryption and decryption. For such cases, we have listed out all the pros and cons of the solution to suggest them to users.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Data Unification Made Easy
Excellent
All good
IBM CLOUD the best security software I Have used
Easy to use
Easy to configure and install
Provides good customer support
Easy to integrate and migerate
Frequency is also good
IBM Cloud Pak
app hub
The price is somewhat excessive (although the power is great, the way to license it is excessively complex)