Reviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
238 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
IBM App Connect for your need
What do you like best about the product?
Configuration and smooth integration with different tool and support of multiple different language.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is not something that we like or not like but there is always scope of improvement and enhance feature to another extent.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Deploying solutions, integrating with different application, creating your microservice environment.
It is best to connect applications and manage data.
What do you like best about the product?
It is a data and applications integration system that offers the best services in its category. It enables you, by automating processes using the App Connect, to interconnect many apps and data savings of 60 percent. With App Connect, you can combine everything into one single API with more than one integration approach. It's also possible to share data using the IBM App Connect API. It has additional improved features such as assisting us to incorporate data from data servers into cloud facilities and servers. Both data are integrated into a single source for every specific application.
What do you dislike about the product?
It's a little more pricey than its like, but it's worth it. I have nothing that I don't like about IBM App Connect if we talk about its operation.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We frequently have projects in which data originates from more than one source and not from a single source. I utilize IBM App Connect for fusion of information from all sources, or rather for my team to construct this application using those data. To merge the data, I use IBM App Connect. It lets me select the integration styles and automatically does the remainder of the data integration. It also supports us in virtually real-time data administration and also produces an API that can be shared simply with the data source. The key benefit is that cross-platform data may be integrated with each other.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Instead, the use of IBM App Connect is easier when data is in a single format, and the use of IBMApp Connect can be converted to one source and can also be shared with other clients or businesses that use it. Ibm App Connect uses data from more than one source, which can only be used from one source. It also complies with various industrial and commercial privacy standards, including CSA Star, which is one of the key reasons.
Excellent for data integration and management
What do you like best about the product?
This product is just fine. You will use only a press of a button when you want to find your data on the server, if you want to change your local data to the cloud and if you want the whole data collection to combine it into one. There is a wonderful user interface and none can run the machine and the customer service is one of the best that I've ever seen. It is user-friendly and encourages consumers to concentrate on creating business logic without infrastructure management. It supports a range of integration styles via batch and real time patterns.
What do you dislike about the product?
To be honest I didn't feel like I didn't like anything but that growth and transition capacity are not perfect if there are some aspects that can be changed already. If certain aspects can be changed now, the potential to evolve and transform isn't so strong. CA API Management is not similar to security functionality. The cost is high, which cannot be achieved for small projects, but I hope that the price should be lowered, I know it is an incredible product and it has many characteristics for its price, so if we were offered a discount it would be much more appealing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am working on a project that requires me to solve problem areas involving working in separate teams and I manage all my data from the cloud while the other department manages their data in a local storage, so we have had a lot of difficulties combining and uniting the data as they were structured in different forms.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
For organisations that exchange data from many systems within a company, or to consumers, I would suggest IBM App Connect. It's easy, quick and secure. This is great for exchanging data between cloud and local storage. The cost is huge, but the functionality and service it provides are worthwhile.
Great integration tool.
What do you like best about the product?
As an enduring commodity, it takes everything from its precedent and integrates modern technology, including robustness, strength, reliability and scalability. The ITX plug-in node and sanitary networking kit have not been supported, however.
What do you dislike about the product?
ITX Plugin Node Support and Health Networking Kit are not yet available, I was informed that it will be available soon but no date. Lifecycle delopements and HIA configurations are available in older versions or without ICP.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We can be assured with the release power that all relevant traffic can be handled without missing data and that our transactions are stable, with the inclusion of MQ. The advantages of the commodity have not yet been completely understood, but the reliability and results are thrilling.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It is an excellent tool, robust, and flexible if you intend to use it as an older ESB, but it is not so strong in Kubernetes because of its footprint and weight. But I would recommend its introduction in general as it is secure, strong support staff and easy to understand. It is a safe platform.
Great product for data integrations.
What do you like best about the product?
Facility for use as soon as the initial obstacle to integration is solved. Quite flexible in networking ability. The team is very sensitive and supportive in product creation. Early adopters (beta) are respected systems. It offers smooth integration and great communication skills. For some business-critical systems we have used it, and the IBM integration bus does the job.
What do you dislike about the product?
It was a smart decision to unbundle it from MQ. In recent years, the rate of licensing has increased considerably, which is bad. The commodity was still pretty costly. In this respect, cloud usage contributes to a significant reduction in the initial cost for smaller businesses.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Typical ESB use scenarios. Connection of all onprem and cloud systems, centralized logging and tracking. Messaging systems between internally used software and some of the offerings of the vendors. In the coming years, we see the footprint will.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Small beginning. Before committing, it is free to download and review. Rapid integration with other IBM products, strong IBM support. It's pretty costly, but it's worth it, because it's working well.
Great application connector, excellent for data management.
What do you like best about the product?
It simplifies the management of data from different servers. It lets us handle both data and data resources through the automation and simplifies us by automating different activities. It helps to build APIS and microservices from the data we have on various servers, so that we can use the data logically. It also allows the customer to have access to enhanced offerings and certain common integration models.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think that the costs are high and that the IBM user interface is fluid, since IBM requirements are not in line with it it needs to be much improved. I believe that access to the API is restrictive and can be enhanced in a limited sense.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
To primarily handle and create apis, I use IBM App Connect. Certain of our clients expect us to use IBM App Connect as their projects have already been subscribed to it. I used IBM App Connect to handle the flow of data between apps during application integration automatically. That is why several programs are delegated where data from many servers across the world must be linked. Instead, I use the ibm app connect to logically connect and use the data for the project like some other process. I have used it once to build microservices, which is almost identical instead of api.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It is a tool that makes it much less workloadable, I would prefer using IBM App Connect. It lets us integrate the data from different servers and it is also very good for lower manual processes and our specifications. The typical models it offers for incorporation are one of the aspects I like best about IBM App Connect.
Average app for connectivity
What do you like best about the product?
Securely articulate APIs to Intranet/Internet
Seemless, the activity flow
Seemless, the activity flow
What do you dislike about the product?
The UI was ineffective while trying to develop integrations
Documentation and support needs improvement
Documentation and support needs improvement
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Integrate data that is available in different systems
App connect review
What do you like best about the product?
I like that it connects applications and data from existing systems and modern technologies across all environments
What do you dislike about the product?
I dddont like tha fact that the environment takes a lot of time to setup
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Integration of Data, Easier building of APIs
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Try it once. It was a great experience
IBM App Connect
What do you like best about the product?
There is nothing better than this unbelievable IBM program, it is an impeccable and meticulously made web application. The user interface helps them feel at home and therefore compatible is available. It can conveniently merge data sets of multiple columns or rows and data types with a customisation or storage cloud, and it simply supports these types of data. You can allow only COBOL and get the data flow in the JSON form, so you can quickly transform the data type into the COBOL and supply it to the IBM MQ Tail using the IBM App Connect integration. You can also link and transform many data sources in JSON format to the COBOL data structure.
What do you dislike about the product?
In all honesty, I think no change, flawless and impeccable, little or no disruption, can be done from now on. The only fault that I see is that the pricing system should be redefined and if I use it for IBM MQ, which is also an IBM utility, you should get a subscription at a lower rate than at present.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have several of our program running on the IBM MQ queue and we get data from many sources and several formats. I am using IBM App Connect primarily for integrating with IBM MQ. Send both of these formats as a COBOL file to an intermediate service for IBM MQ in IBM App Connect to allow the required COBOL data in the IBM MQ queue. This makes us use this unbelievable installation to track all the results. And eventually we see that all of our data is in the database or local cloud at one location and that we can still analyze our data using the research method that is really complete.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I suggest using this APP to transform data structures as an automation service. Others merge data sets into one and transform data systems afterwards. You want to build and distribute the API for other uses of the software, so you can use IBM Connect because it handles all this perfectly. If it is very critical that the service you pay for and are very helpful, helping you share your job and compile data from various places in one location, so that is the path to go on. I would like to make this announcement and to suggest that
Great data processing and processing tool.
What do you like best about the product?
It allows data to be processed in real time and facilitates simultaneous data virtualization. It allows us to virtualize every single data source and create an uncommon environment. It is the simplest way to virtualize information in real time. It provides excellent services, such as data fusion. You can connect data sources using IBM App Connect if you have multifaceted data sources. The data source of a format may be converted to a different format, if needed. Access to AI services is also available.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are some mistakes in the data conversion, some are OK. I don't like IBM App Connect or suggest I have a problem, instead, it's a really excellent application. I have nothing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As in our current project, we use IBM App Connect in a number of ways. In order to transfer data from one application to another application and transform the data to a proper data format in the middle, I used the IBM Connect application. A lot of the data needs to be processed and algorithms implemented. But in the cloud we have more than one server from which I receive the data, so use the information. The IBM app is wired so that data virtualisation can be enabled and linked with preprocessing and calculating algorithms.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I suggest using IBM App Connect because it provides a lot of services which can be used to manage data sources seamlessly and interactively. You can use the data for a number of reasons, including data transfer, data conversion, and also have access to all data-related services and connectors. It has very excellent and precise results as well. I think it works easier when using IBM App Connect, so I advise you to use IBM App Connect.
showing 51 - 60